Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 157–167 | Cite as

Retrospective assessment of a managed coastal realignment and lagoon restoration measure: the Geltinger Birk, Germany

  • Gerald SchernewskiEmail author
  • Caroline Bartel
  • Nils Kobarg
  • Donalda Karnauskaite


We document and analyse the implementation process of a large combined coastal protection realignment and nature protection rewetting scheme, covering about 1000 ha at the German Baltic coast. The assessment reviews local planning documents, includes a media analysis, a tourist survey, stakeholder interviews and we provide criteria for measuring success, derived from the Systems Approach Framework (SAF) concept. The full process in the Geltinger Birk took over 25 years and was finished in 2013. The early years were characterised by strong local opposition, a polarization of the local society, misinformation and negative media coverage. Land purchase, the establishment of a local information centre with an environmental manager, improved public participation, a more pro-active media strategy and the readiness to accept compromises finally enabled a successful implementation. Today, a comprehensive tourism information and guidance system exists and the area became a popular tourist place. 80% of all visitors point out the outstanding nature experience and 87% are positive about the combined coastal protection and restoration measure. Parallel, major stakeholders changed their attitude and today are positive about the situation. However, the long timespan between initiation of the process and implementation of the measure, calls for a systematic, guided management approach, like the SAF. Especially, because climate change, sea level rise and increasing pressures on the coasts require a much faster implementation of adaptation measures in future.


Public perception Public participation Rewetting Coastal wetlands Coastal development Tourist survey 



We thank Dr. J. Hofstede, Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, for giving access to the ministry archive and Prof. Dr. F. Saathoff for supervision of and helpful comments on the master thesis by C. Barthel.

Compliance with ethical standards


The work was part-funded by the BONUS-BaltCoast project. BONUS-BaltCoast has received funding from BONUS (Art 185) funded jointly from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration, and from Baltic Sea national funding institutions (BMBF 03F0717A).


  1. Doody PJ (2013) Coastal squeeze and managed realignment in Southeast England, does it tell us anything about the future? Ocean Coast Manag 79:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Esteves LS (2013) Is managed realignment a sustainable long-term coastal management approach? J Coast Res 1(SI 65):933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Esteves LS, Thomas K (2014) Managed realignment in practice in the UK: results from two independent surveys. J Coast Res 70:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. French PW (2006) Managed realignment – the developing story of a comparatively new approach to soft engineering. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 67:409–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hopkins TS, Bailly D, Elmgren R, Glegg G, Sandberg A, Støttrup JG (2012) A systems approach framework for the transition to sustainable development: potential value based on coastal experiments. Ecol Soc 17(3):39. doi: 10.5751/ES-05266-170339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. MELUR-SH (2012) Generalplan Küstenschutz des Landes Schleswig-Holstein – Fortschreibung
  7. MLR - Ministerium für ländliche Räume, Landesplanung, Landwirtschaft und Tourismus des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (2001) Generalplan Küstenschutz - integriertes Küstenschutzmanagement in Schleswig-Holstein. Kiel, p 76Google Scholar
  8. MLUR-SH Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (2007) Safe Coast: Excursion to Geltinger Birk
  9. MLUR-SH Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (2011) Moorschutzprogramm für Schleswig-Holstein Drucksache 16/2272.
  10. Morris RK (2012) Managed realignment: a sediment management perspective. Ocean Coast Manag 65:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nordstrom KF, Lampe R, Jackson N (2007) Increasing the dynamism of coastal landforms by modifying shore protection methods: examples from the eastern German Baltic Sea coast. Environ Conserv 34:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pendle M (2013) Estuarine and coastal managed realignment sites in England a comparison of predictions with monitoring results for selected case studies. HR Wallingford, Howbery Park, p 36 Google Scholar
  13. Prati G, Albanesi C, Pietrantoni L, Airoldi L (2016) Public perceptions of beach nourishment and conflict management strategies: a case study of Portonovo Bay in the Adriatic Italian coast. Land Use Policy 50:422–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roca E, Villares M (2012) Public perceptions of managed realignment strategies: the case study of the Ebro Delta in the Mediterranean basin. Ocean Coast Manag 60:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rupp-Armstrong S, Nicholls RJ (2007) Coastal and estuarine retreat: a comparison of the application of managed realignment in England and Germany. J Coast Res 23:1418–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spencer KL, Harvey GL (2012) Understanding system disturbance and ecosystem services in restored saltmarshes: integrating physical and biogeochemical processes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 106:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Turner RK, Burgess D, Hadley D, Coombes E, Jackson N (2007) A cost-benefit appraisal of coastal management realignment policy. Glob Environ Chang 17:397–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weisner E, Schernewski G (2013) Adaptation to climate change: A combined coastal protection and re-alignment scheme in a southern Baltic tourism region. J Coast Res 2(SI 65):1963–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea ResearchRostockGermany
  2. 2.Marine Science and Technology CenterKlaipeda UniversityKlaipedaLithuania
  3. 3.State Agency for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas (LLUR)NiebyGermany

Personalised recommendations