Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 657–668 | Cite as

From overexploitation to sustainable use, an overview of 160 years of water extraction in the Amsterdam dunes, the Netherlands

  • L. H. W. T. Geelen
  • P. T. W. J. Kamps
  • T. N. Olsthoorn
Article

Abstract

Dune slacks are low-lying, nutrient-poor, species-rich, inter-dunal, seasonally flooded wetlands, are amongst the most threatened habitats in the Dutch coastal dunes. Since 1853 Waternet has been extracting groundwater from the coastal dunes southwest of Haarlem to produce its drinking water. Dune slacks largely disappeared due to the desiccation caused by this water abstraction, over more than a century biodiversity declined as a consequence. Increased societal concern pushed habitat restoration high on the political agenda by the end of the 1980s. It was agreed to do what is possible to restore original dune slacks without endangering the water supply. Far reaching interventions in the dune water system were foreseen to achieve this mutual goal. To allow reliable decision making, the entire hydrological history of the drinking water production in the Amsterdam Dunes since 1853 and its ecological consequences were evaluated over a 10-year study period. The main tool was a 3D groundwater model constructed using all information gathered to date and calibrated using the long-term monitoring data available and widely extended for the purpose, to which ecological modeling was added and calibrated with the available long-term and extended vegetational inventories. These scientific tools were used to assess proposed interventions to be decided upon, which aimed at finding a new balance between groundwater extraction and nature restoration. In 1996 and 2007 large-scale measures were taken, which include filling in of recovery canals, mowing, grazing and sod-cutting to support the native plant communities of wet dune slack habitats. Results of these measures in terms of the restoration of natural hydrological conditions are shown together with the first results for the recovery of wet slacks vegetation that resulted from the combined hydrological and ecological restoration measures that were taken since 1995.

Keywords

Dune slack restoration Watersupply Amsterdam Coastal dunes Eco-hydrology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Charlie Stratford for his effort to bring the eco-hydrological knowledge of coastal dunes together and stimulation to come to this publication and an anonymous referent for his comment. The proposed changes have greatly improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Arens SM, Mulder JPM, Slings QL, Geelen LHWT, Damsma P (2013) Dynamic dune management, integrating objectives of nature development and coastal safety: examples from the Netherlands. Geomorphology 199(1):205–213Google Scholar
  2. Bakker M, Schaars F (2005) The Sea Water Intrusion (SWI) package manual part I. Theory, user manual, and examples version 1.2Google Scholar
  3. Bakker C, Van Bodegom PM, Nelissen HJM, Ernst WHO, Aerts R (2006) Plant responses to rising water tables and nutrient management in calcareous dune slacks. Plant Ecol 185(1):19–28Google Scholar
  4. Bekker R, Ernst W, de Vries Y (2001) Zaadvoorraad van duinvalleien Bron of belemmering voor herstel? Landschap 2001(3):173–184Google Scholar
  5. de Vries JJ (1982) Anderhalve eeuw hydrologisch onderzoek in Nederland: overzicht van de ontwikkeling van de wetenschappelijke kennis van het water in Nederland tussen 1830 en 1980, beschouwd vanuit een geohydrologische gezichtshoek. Rodopi Amsterdam, p 195Google Scholar
  6. Emke MJ, Kooiman JW (1988) De duinwaterwinplaats geohydrologisch gemodelleerd met het rekenprogramma MODFLOW , 39 pInternal report in Dutch Gemeentewaterleidingen AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Geelen LHWT (1998) ECO-hydrologisch onderzoek eindrapport; scenario’s voor een optimaal samengaan van waterwinning en natuurbeheer in AWD. Gemeentewaterleidingen, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Geelen LHWT, Cousin EFHM, Schoon CF (1995) Regeneration of dune slacks in the Amsterdam Waterwork Dunes. In: Healy, M.G. and J.P. Doody eds. Directions in European Coastal Management, pp 525–532Google Scholar
  9. Gemeentewaterleidingen (1948) Rapport 1948, de watervoorziening van Amsterdam. Internal report in Dutch Gemeentewaterleidingen Amsterdam, 88 p. en 260 p. toelichtingGoogle Scholar
  10. Gevers DT (1826) Verhandelingen over het toegangbaar maken van de duinvalleijen langs de kust van Holland. Verhandeling der Maatschappij ter bevordering van den. Landbouw, pp 18:356Google Scholar
  11. Grootjans AP, Ernst WHO, Stuyfzand PJ (1998) European dune slacks: strong interactions of biology, pedogenesis and hydrology. In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13(3):96–100Google Scholar
  12. Grootjans AP, Geelen LHWT, Jansen AJM, Lammerts EJ (2002) Restoration of coastal dune slacks in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 478:181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grootjans AP, Dullo BW, Kooijman AM, Bekker RM, Aggenbach C (2013) Restoration of dune vegetation in the Netherlands. In. Martínez, M.L., Gallego-Fernández J.B. & Hesp, P.A. (eds). Chapter 15, Restoration of coastal dunes. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–253Google Scholar
  14. Jalink LM, Nauta MM, Becker AG (2001) De mycoflora van het Groot Zwarteveld en enkele andere duingraslanden in de Amsterdamse Waterleidingduinen in relatie tot beheer en vegetatie. Internal report (in Dutch) Gemeentewaterleidingen, Amsterdam, p 38Google Scholar
  15. Jonge HG, de Geelen LHWT, Spierenburg PJ (2012) Duinen en waterwinning: functionele natuur met toekomst. Landschap 3:118–123Google Scholar
  16. Kamps PTWJ (1999) Beschrijving van AMWADU, beschrijving van de modelinvoer en calibratie van het grondwaterstomingsmodel van de AMsterdamse WAterleidingDUinen. Gemeentewaterleidingen Amsterdam, Internal report (in Dutch) Waternet, Amsterdam, p 54Google Scholar
  17. Kamps PTWJ (2006) Calibration of the groundwatermodel of the Amsterdam water supply Dunes and adjacent areas (in Dutch). Internal report Waternet, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamps PTWJ, Olsthoorn TN (2001) Verdroging en vernatting van de. AWD Landschap 3:147–160Google Scholar
  19. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tooi to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koster MAM (1994) Amsterdamse waterleidingduinen: inventarisatie van de geologische gegevens ten behoeve van de koppeling aan het hydrologisch lagenmodel van het Regionaal Geohydrologisch Informatiesysteem (REGIS). Gemeentewaterleidingen Amsterdam, p 71Google Scholar
  21. Londo G (1966a) De huidige flora van het infiltratiegebied bij Zandvoort in vergelijking met andere natte duinvalleien in heden en verleden. De Levende Natuur 69:145–151Google Scholar
  22. Londo G (1966b) Veranderingen in flora en vegetatie van het Lekwater-infiltratiegebied in de duinen bij Zandvoort. De Levende Natuur 69:121–128Google Scholar
  23. Londo G (1975) Infiltreren is nivelleren. De Levende Natuur 78(4):74–80Google Scholar
  24. Mourik J, Londo G (1986) Vestiging van bijzondere plantensoorten in het infiltratiegebied van de Amsterdamse Waterleidingduinen. Gorteria 13:3–12Google Scholar
  25. Nauta MM, Jalink LM (2001) Grasslands in the coastal dunes: the effect of nature management on the mycota. In: Moore D, Nauta M, Evans S, Rotheroe M (eds) Fungal Conservation, Issues and solutions. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Nienhuis PR, Kamps PTWJ, Schaars FW (2006) Historical field data 1904-2004 used to validate 100 years movement of salt/fresh interface simulated with the SWI-package. Paper presented at the 1st SWIM-SWICA Joint Salt Water Intrusion Meeting, Cagliari-Chia LagunaGoogle Scholar
  27. Nienhuis PR, Olsthoorn TN, Kamps PTWJ (2012) Modelling AS (T) R in the Amsterdam Water Supply Dunes to explore options to cope with future intake water shortages caused by climate change. In: Proceedings of 22nd Salt Water Intrusion Meeting SWIM 2012, Armação dos Búzios, pp 138–139Google Scholar
  28. Nienhuis P, Kamps P, Olsthoorn TN (2013) 160 Years of History of the Amsterdam water supply Dune area modeled with variable density, outlook into the future. In: Maxwell R, Hill M, Zheng C, Tonkin M (eds) Proceedings of MODFLOW and More 2013: Translating Science Into Practice. Golden, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. Olsthoorn TN (1998) Groundwater modelling, calibration and the use of spreadsheets. PhD, TU Delft, p 296Google Scholar
  30. Olsthoorn TN, Schaars FW (1998) Variable density Groundwater Modelling with MODFLOW: Example Amsterdam Dune Water Area. Proceedings of the MODFLOW98 Golden Conf., Poeter, E et al. (Eds.) Colorado School of Mines, pp 579–586Google Scholar
  31. Pennink JMK (1915) Grondwater stroombanen. Uitkomsten van een onderzoek, verricht in de jaren 1904 en 1905 naar den vorm der stroombanen van grondwater, zich bewegend in zuiver zand. Stadsdrukkerij 1915, p 149Google Scholar
  32. Rhymes J, Wallace H, Fenner N, Jones L. (2014) Evidence for sensitivity of dune wetlands to groundwater nutrients. Sci Total Environ 490:106–113Google Scholar
  33. Schaars F, van Vliet F, Beekman W, Maas K, Schellingen C (2006) Optimalisatie natuur en waterwinning in de Amsterdamse Waterleidingduinen. Milieueffectrapport “Korte Termijn”, deelrapport Hydrologie, p 113Google Scholar
  34. Stuyfzand PJ (1988) Hydrochemie en hydrologie van duinen en aangrenzende polders tussen Noordwijk en Zandvoort aan Zee. KIWA swe 87:007Google Scholar
  35. Stuyfzand PJ (1993) Hydrochemistry and hydrology ol the coastal dune area ol the western Netherlands. Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, KIWA, Nieuwegein, p 366Google Scholar
  36. Thijsse JP (1943) Onze Duinen. Heemschutserie nr. 23. Allertde Lange, Amsterdam, p 88Google Scholar
  37. van Dijk HWJ (1984) Invloeden van Oppervlakte-Infiltratie: en behoeve van Duinwaterwinning op Kruidachtige Oevervegetaties. Dissertatie Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen (with English summary), p 240Google Scholar
  38. van Dijk HWJ, Grootjans AP (1993) Wet dune slacks: decline and new opportunities. Hydrobiologia 265:281–304Google Scholar
  39. van Eeden FW (1874) Lijst der planten die in de Nederlandse Duinstreken gevonden zijn. Nederlands Kruidkundig Archief 2(1):360–451Google Scholar
  40. van der Hagen HGJM, Geelen LHWT, de Vries CN (2008) Dune slack restoration in Dutch mainland coastal dunes. J Nat Conserv 16(1):1–11Google Scholar
  41. van der Meulen F (1982) Vegetation changes and water catchment in a Dutch coastal dune area. Biol Cons 24:305–316Google Scholar
  42. van Zadelhoff F (1981) Nederlandse Kustduinen: geobotanie. Pudoc. WageningenGoogle Scholar
  43. Vuyck L (1898) De Plantengroei der Duinen. Thesis University Leiden, p 368Google Scholar
  44. Zuidhoff A (1992) Flora van de duinstreek tussen Noordwijkerhout en Zandvoort 1850–1986. Internal report in Dutch Gemeentewaterleidingen, Amsterdam, p 32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. H. W. T. Geelen
    • 1
  • P. T. W. J. Kamps
    • 1
  • T. N. Olsthoorn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Waternet (Amsterdam Water Supply), Nature Management DepartmentVogelenzangThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty CITG (Civ. Eng. & Geosc.)Technical University DelftDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations