Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beachgoers’ perceptions of sandy beach conditions: demographic and attitudinal influences, and the implications for beach ecosystem management

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sandy beaches represent typical venues for recreation and tourism worldwide, as well as part of the lifestyle and identity of coastal communities. Their overexploitation, however, threatens their survival. Especially in urban areas, beach management requires balancing needs by different users and obligations to protect beach functions, including conservation. In light of this, research about the human dimension of beach ecosystems has been advanced as a way to assist planning and decision making in beach management. This study assessed beachgoers' perceptions of sandy beach conditions in South Africa, by means of a questionnaire survey. The effects of demographic profile, travelling habits, motivations to visit, and recreational preferences on beachgoers' perceptions of beach conditions were tested. Beachgoers shared a general concern for the wellbeing of sandy beaches, with particular reference to the state of biodiversity and conservation. They also gave great importance to the values underlying beach ecosystems. Three motivations to visit groups and four recreational preferences types were identified. Demography, travelling habits, motivations to visit, and recreational preferences all influenced perceptions of beach conditions. The results from this study were used to draw management recommendations, with particular attention towards the promotion of conservation while also maintaining the recreational quality of urban sandy beaches. The results also highlighted the relevance of considering users' views as a tool in decision-making processes in Integrated Coastal Zone Management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriaens T, Sutton-Croft M, Owen K, Brosens D, van Valkenburg J, Kilbey D, Groom Q, Ehmig C, Thürkov F, Van Hende P, Schneider K (2015) Trying to engage the crowd in recording invasive alien species in Europe: experiences from two smartphone applications in northwest Europe. Manag Biol Invasion 6(2):215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariza E, Jiménez JA, Sardá R, Villares M, Pinto J, Fraguell R, Roca E, Marti C, Valdemoro H, Ballester R, Fluvia M (2010) Proposal for an integral quality index for urban and urbanized beaches. Environ Manag 45:998–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariza E, Lindeman KC, Mozumder P, Suman DO (2014) Beach management in Florida: assessing stakeholder perceptions on governance. Ocean Coast Manag 96:82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballance A, Ryan PG, Turpie JK (2000) How much is a clean beach worth? The impact of litter on beach users in the cape peninsula, South Africa. S Afr J Sci 96:210–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Baysan SK (2001) Perceptions of the environmental impacts of tourism: a comparative study of the attitudes of German, Russian and Turkish tourists in kemer, Antalya. Tourism Geogr 3(2):218–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerli A, Martín JD (2004) Tourists’ characteristics and the perceived image of tourist destinations: a quantitative analysis—a case study of lanzarote, Spain. Tourism Manag 25:623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blue Flag South Africa (2014) Retrieved March 20, 2014, from www.blueflag.org.za

  • Bonaiuto M, Breakwell GM, Cano I (1996) Identity processes and environmental threat: the effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 6:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannstrom C, Brown HL, Houser C, Trimble S, Santos A (2015) “You can’t see them from sitting here”: evaluating beach user understanding of a rip current warning sign. Appl Geogr 56:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celliers L, Moffett T, James NC, Mann BQ (2004) A strategic assessment of recreational use areas for off-road vehicles in the coastal zone of KwaZulu- natal, South Africa. Ocean Coast Manag 47:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celliers L, Colenbrander DR, Breetzke T, Oelofse G (2015) Towards increased degrees of integrated coastal management in the City of Cape Town, South Africa. Ocean Coast Manag 105:138–153

  • Cendrero A, Fischer DW (1997) A procedure for assessing the environmental quality of coastal areas for planning and management. J Coastal Res 13(3):732–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes O, Espejel I, Arellano E, Delhumeau S (2008) Users’ perceptions as a tool to improve urban beach planning and management. Environ Manag 42:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinner JE, Pollanc RB (2004) Poverty, perceptions and planning: why socioeconomics matter in the management of Mexican reefs. Ocean Coast Manag 47:479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1973) Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educ Psychol Meas 33:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colenbrander D, Cartwright A, Taylor A (2015) Drawing a line in the sand: managing coastal risks in the city of cape town. S Afr Geogr J 97(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey AL (1973) A first course in factor analysis. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie A (2008) The Whale Trail of South Africa. 30° South Publishers, Johannesburg, p. 144

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyck AMC, Soares AC, McLachlan A (1995) Factors influencing human beach choice on three South African beaches: a multivariate analysis. GeoJournal 36(4):345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Winter JCF, Dodou D, Wieringa PA (2009) Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivar Behav Res 44:147–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defeo O, McLachlan A, Schoeman DS, Schlacher TA, Dugan J, Jones A, Lastra M, Scapini F (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira MA, Soares L, Andrade F (2012) Educating citizens about their coastal environments: beach profiling in the coastwatch project. J Coast Conserv 16:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz CO, Morris PE (2012) Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen 141(1):2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghermandi A, Galil B, Gowdy J, Nunes PALD (2015) Jellyfish outbreak impacts on recreation in the Mediterranean sea: welfare estimates from a socioeconomic pilot survey in Israel. Ecosyst Serv 11:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre M (2010) Canonical correspondence analysis in social science research. In: Locarek-Junge H, Weihs C (eds) Classification as a tool for research. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 279–286

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate data analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø., Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

  • Harris LR (2012) An ecosystem-based spatial conservation plan for the South African sandy beaches. Dissertation, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth

  • Harris LR, Nel R, Schoeman DS (2011) Mapping beach morphodynamics remotely: a novel application tested on South African sandy shores. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 92:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris L, Nel R, Holness S, Schoeman D (2015) Quantifying cumulative threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a tool to guide ecosystem-based management beyond coastal reserves. Ocean Coast Manag 110:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James RJ (2000) From beaches to beach environments: linking the ecology, human-use, and management of beaches in Australia. Ocean Coast Manag 43(6):495–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jax K, Barton DN, Chan KMA, de Groot R, Doyle U, Eser U, Görg C, Gómez-Baggethun E, Griewald Y, Haber W, Haines-Young R, Heink U, Jahn T, Joosten H, Kerschbaumer L, Korn H, Luck GW, Matzdorf B, Muraca B, Neßhöver C, Norton B, Ott K, Potschin M, Rauschmayer F, von Haaren C, Wichmann S (2013) Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecol Econ 93:260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimley AP, Ainley DG (1998) Great white sharks: the biology of carcharodon carcharias. Academic Press, San Diego, p. 517

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock A, Titley S, Petersen W, Sikweyiya M, Tsotsobe S, Colenbrander D, Gold H, Oelofse G (2012) Shark spotters: a pioneering shark safety program in cape town, South Africa. In: Domeier ML (ed) Global perspectives on the biology and life history of the white shark. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 447–466

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kontogianni A, Damigos D, Tourkolias C, Vousdoukas M, Velegrakis A, Zanou B, Skourtos M (2014) Eliciting beach users’ willingness to pay for protecting European beaches from beachrock processes. Ocean Coast Manag 98:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leatherman SP (1997) Beach rating: a methodological approach. J Coastal Res 13(1):253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TH (2011) How recreation involvement, place attachment, and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behavior. J Sustain Tourism 19(7):895–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TH, Jan FH, Huang GW (2015) The influence of recreation experiences on environmentally responsible behavior: the case of liuqiu island, Taiwan. J Sustain Tourism 23(6):947–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou LC, Coudounaris DN, Kvasova O, Christodoulides P (2015) Drivers and outcomes of green tourist attitudes and behavior: sociodemographic moderating effects. Psychol Market 32(6):635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozoya JP, Sardá R, Jiménez JA (2014) Users expectations and the need for differential beach management frameworks along the costa Brava: urban vs. natural protected beaches. Land Use Policy 38:397–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucrezi S, Saayman M, van der Merwe P (2015) Managing beaches and beachgoers: lessons from and for the blue flag award. Tourism Manag 48:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S (1999) Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods 4:84–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire GS, Miller KK, Weston MA, Young K (2011) Being beside the seaside: beach use and preferences among coastal residents of south-eastern Australia. Ocean Coast Manag 54:781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire GS, Rimmer JM, Weston MA (2013) Stakeholder perceptions of threatened species and their management on urban beaches. Animals 3:1002–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maree JG, Pietersen J (2007) Sampling. In: Maree JG (ed) First steps in research. Van Schaik Publishers, Pretoria, p. 174

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow A (1970) Motivation and personality, 2nd edn. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan A, Defeo O, Jaramillo E, Short AD (2013) Sandy beach conservation and recreation: guidelines for optimizing management strategies for multi-purpose use. Ocean Coast Manag 71(1):256–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead A, Griffiths CL, Branch GM, McQuaid CD, Blamey LK, Bolton JJ, Anderson RJ, Dufois F, Rouault M, Froneman PW, Whitfield AK, Harris LR, Nel R, Pillay D, Adams JB (2013) Human-mediated drivers of change—impacts on coastal ecosystems and marine biota of South Africa. Afr J Mar Sci 35(3):403–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlino S, Marini C, Tosi D, Caselli L, Marini D, Lucchinelli P, Vetteroni D, Lunardelli F, Agrusa A, Lombardi D, Stroobant M (2014) Project Seacleaner: From cooperation among ISMAR-CNR researchers, high school students and the Ligurian Cluster for Marine Technologies to an application for environmental monitoring and scientific research. Geophys Res Abstr 16:EGU-2014-5454-1

  • Morgan R (1999) A novel, user-based rating system for tourist beaches. Tourism Manag 20:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R, Jones TC, Williams AT (1993) Opinions and perceptions of England and wales heritage coast beach users: some management implications from the glamorgan heritage coast, wales. J Coastal Res 9(4):1083–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 752

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh CO, Draper J, Dixon AW (2010) Comparing resident and tourist preferences for public beach access and related amenities. Ocean Coast Manag 53:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby AA, Forys EA (2010) The effects of an education campaign on beach user perceptions of beach-nesting birds in Pinellas county, Florida. Hum Dimens Wildl 15:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira LCC, Jiménez JA, Medeiros C, da Costa RM (2003) The influence of the environmental status of casa caiada and Rio doce beaches (NE-Brazil) on beach users. Ocean Coast Manag 46:1011–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine BJ, Gilmore JH (1998) Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Bus Rev 76(4):96–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Priskin J (2003) Tourist perceptions of degradation caused by coastal nature-based recreation. Environ Manag 32(2):189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramseook-Munhurrun P, Seebaluck VN, Naidoo P (2015) Examining the structural relationships of destination image, perceived value, tourist satisfaction and loyalty: case of Mauritius. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 175:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roca E, Villares M (2008) Public perceptions for evaluating beach quality in urban and semi-natural environments. Ocean Coast Manag 51(4):314–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roca E, Riera C, Villares M, Fragell R, Junyent R (2008) A combined assessment of beach occupancy and public perceptions of beach quality: a case study in the costa Brava, Spain. Ocean Coast Manag 51(12):839–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roca E, Villares M, Ortego MI (2009) Assessing public perceptions on beach quality according to beach users’ profile: a case study in the costa Brava (Spain). Tourism Manag 30(4):598–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saayman M, Slabbert E, Van der Merwe P (2009) Travel motivation: a tale of two marine destinations in South Africa. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreation 31(1):81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Schernewski G (2014) Integrated coastal zone management. In: Encyclopedia of marine geosciences. Springer Netherlands, pp 1–5

  • Schlacher TA, Schoeman DS, Dugan JE, Lastra M, Jones AR, Scapini F, McLachlan A (2008) Sandy beach ecosystems: key features, sampling issues, management challenges and climate change impacts. Mar Ecol 29:70–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlacher TA, Schoeman DS, Jones AR, Dugan JE, Hubbard DM, Defeo O, Peterson CH, Weston MA, Maslo B, Olds AD, Scapini F, Nel R, Harris LR, Lucrezi S, Lastra M, Huijbers CM, Connolly RM (2014) Metrics to assess ecological condition, change, and impacts in sandy beach ecosystems. J Environ Manag 144:322–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivlani MP, Letson D, Theis M (2003) Visitor preference for public beach amenities and beach restoration in south Florida. Coast Manag 31:367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider A, Luo S, Hill J, Herstine J (2015) Perceptions of availability of beach parking and access predictors of coastal tourism. Ocean Coast Manag 105:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JP (2012) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 5th edn. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, p. 664

    Google Scholar 

  • Storrier KL, McGlashan DJ (2006) Development and management of a coastal litter campaign: the voluntary coastal partnership approach. Mar Policy 30:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67(5):1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripadvisor (2014) Retrieved October 7, 2014, from http://www.tripadvisor.com/TravelersChoice

  • Tudor DT, Williams AT (2006) A rationale for beach selection by the public on the coast of wales, UK. Area 38(2):153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall SM, Penning-Rowsell EC (1998) The English beach: experiences and values. Geogr J 164(3):319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villares M, Roca E, Serra J, Montori C (2006) Social perceptions as a tool for beach planning: a case study on the Catalan coast. J Coastal Res SI 48:118–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer M, Gollan N, Barclay K, Gladstone W (2015) ‘It’s part of me’; understanding the values, images, and principles of coastal users and their influence on the social acceptability of MPAs. Mar Policy 52:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimann E (2014) Blue flag beaches-bathers at risk for thalassogenic diseases. J Environ Ecol 5(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AT, Micallef A (2009) Beach management: principles and practices. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch J, Zhang J (2004) Beach recreation, cultural diversity and attitudes toward nature. J Leis Res 36(3):414–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon Y, Uysal M (2005) An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: a structural model. Tourism Manag 26:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to extend their gratitude to all the beachgoers who participated in the beach survey, and to the fieldworkers. This study was funded by TREES at the North-West University and the National Research Foundation (NRF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena Lucrezi.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix 1

(PDF 2.56 mb)

Appendix 2

(DOC 71 kb)

Appendix 3

(DOC 59.5 kb)

Appendix 4

(DOC 59 kb)

Appendix 5

(DOC 68 kb)

Appendix 6

(DOC 122 kb)

Appendix 7

(DOC 70 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucrezi, S., van der Walt, M.F. Beachgoers’ perceptions of sandy beach conditions: demographic and attitudinal influences, and the implications for beach ecosystem management. J Coast Conserv 20, 81–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-015-0419-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-015-0419-3

Keywords

Navigation