Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An examination of coastal conservation by remote sensing in Baja California Sur, México

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The state of Baja California Sur (BCS), Mexico, has a coastline of 2131 km with eight Protected Natural Areas (PNA) (33,075 km2) mainly located in the coastal zone. Here, we (1) review the current status of the diversity and distribution of coastal ecosystems in BCS, (2) assess the composition and coverage of these ecosystems in PNAs, and (3) identify coastal ecosystems of special interest for conservation. The combination of spatial analysis techniques was carried out using LandSat TM images and GIS processing, considering ecoregions and ecosystems in the coastal zone, as well as through the application of an ecosystem diversity index. In the BCS coastal zone, 11 ecosystems were identified: scrub, coastal water body, riparian, bare soil, halophyte, beach, salt flat, mangrove, salt marsh, coral reef, and seagrass. The ecosystem diversity in BCS results from the coastal features that differentiate the Pacific and the Gulf coasts. PNAs include 17 % of coastal ecosystems. Bahia Magdalena (Pacific) and Bahia Concepción (Gulf of California), which are key for conservation (including mangroves and seagrasses), should be considered either for classification as PNAs or for inclusion in coastal management programs. The combination of remote sensing and GIS with biogeographic and ecosystemic approaches in our study enabled to determine ecosystem diversity and set coastal conservation priorities in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Specifically, coastal ecosystems that are not currently included within PNAs and which should be considered as conservation priorities were identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth TD, Thurber RV, Gates RD (2010) The future of coral reefs: a microbial perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 25(4):233–240. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alatorre LC, Sánchez-Andrés R, Cirujano S, Begueria S, Sanchéz-Carrillo S (2011) Identification of mangrove areas by remote sensing: the ROC curve technique applied to the Northwestern Mexico coastal. Remote Sens 3:1568–1583. doi:10.3390/rs3081568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alphan H, Doygun H, Unlukaplan YI (2009) Post-classification comparison of land cover using multitemporal Landsat and ASTER imagery: the case of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 151(1–4):327–336. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0274-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Romero JG, Pressey RL, Ban NC, Torre-Cosío J, Aburto-Oropeza O (2013) Marine conservation planning in practice: lessons learned from the Gulf of California. Aquat Conserv 23:483–505. doi:10.1002/aqc.2334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrey CL, Fleming CM (2014) Valuing ecosystem diversity in South East Queensland: a life satisfaction approach. Soc Indic Res 115(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arquero A, Gonzalo C, Martínez E, Ferreras AM (1998) Utilización de scattergrams’s de ERMapper para la elección de áreas de entrenamiento en la clasificación temática de imágenes LandSat. Mapping 50:56–58, www.mappinginteractivo.com

  • Bailey R (2004) Identifying ecoregion boundaries. Environ Manag 34(1):14–26. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0163-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez H, Arizmendi C, Márquez L (1999) Base de datos de las AICAS. CIPAMEX, CONABIO, FMCN y CCA. México. http://www.conabio.gob.mx

  • Bezaury-Creel JE, Castro-Campos M (2009) Base de datos geográfica de arrecifes y comunidades coralinas en México en baja resolución. Versión 1.0. 1 Capa ArcGIS 9.2 + 1 Capa Google Earth KML (2010). In: Bezaury-Creel JE, Torres JF (eds), Base de Datos Geográfica de las Aguas Marinas y Costeras Mexicanas, Versión 1.0. The Nature Conservancy. 24 Capas ArcGIS 9.2 + 19 Capas Google Earth KMZ + 12 Capas Google Earth KML + 1 Archivo de Metadatos en texto

  • Breckle SW (2004) Salinity, halophytes and salt affected natural ecosystem. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U (eds) Salinity: environment-plants-molecules. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 53–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona R, Danemann GD (1997) Spatiotemporal distribution of birds at the Guerrero Negro, Baja California. Cienc Mar 24(4):389–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvaud S, Bouchon C, Maniere R (1998) Remote sensing techniques adaptes to high resolution mapping of tropical coastal marine ecosystem (coral reefs, seagrasses beds and mangrove). Int J Remote Sens 19(18):3625–3639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) (2002) Áreas importantes para la conservación de las aves en México (AICAS), CONABIO. http://conabioweb.conabio.gob.mx/aicas/doctos/ aicas.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2014

  • Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) (2008) Distribución de los manglares de México. Escala 1:50 000. Extraído del proyecto DQ056: Programa de monitoreo de manglares de México a largo plazo, primera etapa. CONABIO. Distrito Federal, México

  • Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-García LM, Arreola-Lizárraga JA, Mendoza-Salgado RA, Galina-Tessaro P, Beltrán Morales LF, Ortega-Rubio A (2015) Appliying ecological diversity índices with ecosystem approach at ecorregional level and prioritizing the decree of new protected areas. Interciencia 40(3):179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahdouh-Guebas F (2002) The use of Remote Sensing and GIS in the sustainable management of tropical coastal ecosystems. Environ Dev Sustain 4:93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RM (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Lanza-Espino G, Ortiz-Pérez MA, Carbajal-Pérez JL (2013) Diferenciación hidrogeomorfológica de los ambientes costeros del Pacífico, del Golfo de México y del Mar Caribe. Investig Geogr Bol Instituto Geogr UNAM 81:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Defeo O, McLachlan A, Schoeman DS, Schlacher TA, Dugan J, Jones A, Lastra M, Scapini F (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enríquez-Andrade R, Anaya-Reyna G, Barrera-Guevara JC, Carvajal-Moreno MA, Martínez-Delgado ME, Vaca-Rodríguez J, Valdés-Casillas C (2005) An analysis of critical areas for biodiversity conservation in the Gulf of California Region. Ocean Coast Manag 48:31–50. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA, Clipson NJW (1986) Halophyte. Q Rev Biol 61(3):313–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey RW, Basan PB (1978) Coastal salt marshes. In: Davis RA Jr (ed) Coastal sedimentary environments. Springer, New York, pp 101–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • González-Abraham CE, Garcillán PP, Ezcurra E (2010) Ecorregiones de la Península de Baja California: Una síntesis. Bol Soc Bot Méx 87:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Zamorano P, Nava-Sánchez EH, León de la Luz JL, Díaz-Castro SC (2011) Patrones de distribución y determinantes ambientales de los manglares peninsulares. In: Félix-Pico EF, Serviere-Zaragoza E, Riosmena-Rodriguez R, León de la Luz JL (eds), Los Manglares de la Península de Baja California, CICIMAR-CIBNOR-UABS, BCS, México, pp 67-103

  • Green EP, Short FT (2003) World atlas of seagrasses. UNEP-WCMC, Cambrigde

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorius HR, Gillet EM (2008) Generalized Simpson-diversity. Ecol Model 211(1-2):90–96. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullström M, De la Torre-Castro M, Bandeira SO, Björk M, Dahlberg M, Kautsky N, Rönnbäck P, Öhman M (2002) Seagrass ecosystems in the Western Indian Ocean. Ambio 31(7–8):588–596. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.7.588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton AJ (2005) Species diversity or biodiversity? J Environ Manag 75(1):89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings SJ, Oechel WC, Muhlia-Melo A (2005) Diurnal, seasonal and annual variation in the net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a desert shrub community (Sarcocaulescent) in Baja California, Mexico. Glob Change Biol 11(6):927–939. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00951.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher BG (1997) Coral reef ecosystem: how much grater is the whole than the sum of the part? Coral Reefs 16:77–91. doi:10.1007/s003380050244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jizhong Z, Shijun M, Changming C (1991) An index of ecosystem diversity. Ecol Model 59(3–4):151–163. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(91)90176-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemas V (2013) Airborne remote sensing of coastal features and processes: an overview. J Coast Res 29(2):239–255. doi:10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00107.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopf FL, Johnson RR, Rich T, Samson FB, Szaro RC (1988) Conservation of riparian ecosystem in the United States. Wilson Bull 100(2):272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford RR (1977) Coastal lagoons of Mexico: their origin and classification. In: Wiley M (ed) Estuarine processes circulation, sediments and transfer of material in the estuary. Estuarine Processes Academic, New York, pp 182–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapin M, Barnes BV (1995) Using the landscape ecosystem approach to assess species and ecosystem diversity. Conserv Biol 9(5):1148–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara-Lara JR, Arenas-Fuentes V, Bazán-Guzmán C, Díaz-Castañeda V, Escobar-Briones E, García-Abad MC, Gaxiola-Castro G, Robles-Jarero G, Sosa-Avalos R, Soto-González LA, Tapia Garcia M, Valdéz-Holguín JE (2008) Los ecosistemas marinos. In: Capital Natural de México. Vol. I: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad, CONABIO, México, pp 135–159

  • León de la Luz JL, Pérez-Navarro JJ, Breceda A (2000) A transitional xerophytic tropical plant community of the Cape Region, Baja California. J Veg Sci 11:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie HM (2005) A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Conserv Biol 19:1701–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A (2010) Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185:54–78. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Blanco J, Villers-Ruiz L (1995) Delineating boundaries of environmental units for land management using a geomorphological approach and GIS: a study in Baja California, Mexico. Remote Sens Environ 53(2):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourie SA, Vincent ACJ (2004) Using biogeography to help set priorities in marine conservation. Conserv Biol 18(4):1004–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R, Leonard R, Sherindan J (1985) Managing riparian ecosystem to control nonpoint pollution. J Soil Water Conserv 40(1):87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE (1980) Mangrove ecosystem: successional or steady state. Biotropica 12(2):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maya Y, Arriaga L (1996) Litterfall and phenological patterns of the dominand overstorey species of a desert scrub community in north-western Mexico. J Arid Environ 34(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project (2010) Validated maps provided by the Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, University of South Florida (IMaRS/USF) and Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD, Centre de Nouméa), with support from NASA. \\WCMC-PC-01107\D$\corals_2010\Coral.gdb

  • Moberg F, Folke C (1999) Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecol Econ 29(2):215–233. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00009-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Casasola P (2006) ¿Son suficientes las Áreas Naturales Protegidas costeras en México? In: Moreno-Casasola P, Peresbarbosas-Rosas E, Travieso-Bello AC (eds) Estrategias para el manejo integral costero: El enfoque municipal. Instituto de Ecología A.C. y CONANP, México, pp 801–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Lucas R, Honrado JP, Jongman RHG, Tarantino C, Adamo M, Mairota P (2013) Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: assessing protected areas, hábitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats. Ecol Indic 33:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ, Carruthers TJB, Dennison WC, Duarte CM, Fourqurean JW, Heck KL Jr, Hughes AR, Kendrick GA, Kenworthy WJ, Olyarnik S, Short FT, Waycott M, Williams SL (2006) A global crisis for Seagrass. Ecosystems 56(12):987–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM (2008) La caracterización funcional de ecosistemas mediante sensores remotos. Ecosistemas 17(3):4–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Perea MC, Ezcurra E, León de la Luz JL (2005) Functional morphology of a sarcocaulescent desert scrub in the bay of La Paz, Baja California, Sur. J Arid Environ 62(3):413–420. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-García P, Lot A (1994) La distribución del manglar y de los “pastos marinos” en el Golfo de California, México. An Inst Bio 65(1):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Talavera-Sáenz A, Acosta-Vargas B, Gardner SC (2009) Heavy metals dynamics in seaweeds and seagrasses in Bahía Magdalena, B.C.S., México. J Appl Phycol 22(3):283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JJ, Best BD, Dunn DC, Treml EA, Halpin P (2010) Marine geospatial ecology tools: an integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++. Environ Model Softw 25:1197–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santibáñez-Andrade G, Castillo-Argüero S, Zavala-Hurtado JA, Martínez-Orea Y, Hernández-Apolinar M (2009) La heterogeneidad ambiental en un matorral xerófilo. Bol Soc Bot Méx 85:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlacher TA, Schoeman DS, Dugan J, Lastra M, Jones A, Scapini F, McLachlan A (2008) Sandy beach ecosystems: key features, sampling issues, management challenges and climate change impacts. Mar Ecol PSZNI 29:70–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalaby A, Tateishi R (2007) Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use changes in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Appl Geogr 27(1):28–41. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding MD, Raviolius C, Green EP (2001) World atlas of coral reef. UNEP-WCDMC. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR, Davidson N, Ferdaña ZA, Finlayson MA, Halpern BS, Jorge MA, Lombana A, Lourie SA, Martin KD, Macmanus E, Molnar J, Recchia CA, Robertson J (2007) Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 57(7):573–587. doi:10.1641/B570707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding MD, Kainuma M, Collins L (2010) World atlas of mangroves. ITTO, ISME, FAO, UNEP-WCMC, UNESCO-MAB and UNUINWEH

  • Stanley VG, Swanson FJ, Mckee WA, Cummins KW (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41(8):540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AJA, John EA, Hutchings MJ (2000) The world is heterogeneous: ecological consequences of living in a patchy environment. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (eds) The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven TAM, Fryrear DW, Spaan WP (1989) Vegetation characteristics and soil loss by wind. J Soil Water Conserv 44(4):347–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco-García JA (2009) Ambientes geológicos costeros del litoral de la Bahía de La Paz, Baja California, Sur, México. Master Science Thesis, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, México

  • Wang W, Weng Q (2014) Remote sensing of natural resources. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Franklin SE, Guo X, Cattet M (2010) Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: a review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists. Sensors 10:9647–9667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward DH, Tibbitts TL, Carrera-González E, Kempka R (2004) Use of digital multispectral videography to assess seagrass distribution in San Quintín Bay, Baja California, México. Cienc Mar 30(1A):47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore RC, Brusca RC, León de la Luz JL, González-Zamorano P, Mendoza-Salgado R, Amador-Silva ES, Holguin G, Galvan-Magaña F, Hastings PA, Cartron JLE, Felger RS, Seminoff JA, McIvor CC (2005) The ecological importance of mangroves in Baja California Sur: conservations implications for an endangered ecosystem. In: Cartron JLE, Ceballos G, Felger RS (eds) Biodiversity, ecosystem, and conservation in Northern Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 298–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson T, Wiken E, Bezaury-Creel J, Hourigan T, Agardy T, Herrmann H, Janishevski L, Madden C, Morgan L, Padilla M (2009) Ecorregiones marinas de América del Norte. Comisión para la Cooperación Ambiental. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Geographic Information System Laboratory of CIBNOR, in particular to Rocio Coria Benet for the facilities provided; for projects CONACYT-SEMARNAT-2006-C01-23449, CONACYT-SEMARNAT-2008-1-107923, CONACYT-REDES-TÉMATICAS-194637. L.M. Cruz Garcia is CONACYT scholarship recipient. Thanks to María Elena Sánchez for editing the English-language text.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This manuscript has not been published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

All authors approved the manuscript and this submission.

Funding

CONACYT-SEMARNAT-2006-C01-23449, CONACYT-SEMARNAT-2008-1-107923, CONACYT-REDES-TÉMATICAS-194637

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Alfredo Arreola-Lizárraga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cruz-García, L.M., Arreola-Lizárraga, J.A., Ceseña-Beltrán, G.E. et al. An examination of coastal conservation by remote sensing in Baja California Sur, México. J Coast Conserv 19, 609–619 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-015-0411-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-015-0411-y

Keywords

Navigation