Skip to main content

Relevance of crowding effects in a coastal National Park in Germany: results from a case study on Hamburger Hallig

Journal of Coastal Conservation volume 16, pages 531–541 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Coastal environments are popular sites for tourism and faced with an increasing recreational demand. Most of European coastal areas attract numerous visitors annually. In recreation research this management problem can be described in terms of carrying capacity which expresses the ability of a site or region to absorb recreational use without deterioration of natural resources and the quality of the visitor experience. As social aspects of recreation in Europe still have received little attention, the purpose of this study is to examine the applicability of the concept of social carrying capacity in a German coastal national park. The article addresses if the relationship between perceived visitor encounters, crowding perception and visitor characteristics is applicable by using data from an on-site survey (N = 509) of visitors conducted on Hamburger Hallig, Germany. It examines whether effects of overcrowding are measurable on a popular daytrip destination with established approaches. Results demonstrate that visitors to Hamburger Hallig are characterised by a heterogeneous visitor composition of local residents and domestic tourists with different motivations and who mainly visited the area for hiking or cycling. Study findings show that valuation for reported encounters and perceived crowding differed substantially among origin of visitors and sampling dates. All in all, respondents report a high level of encounter with others and in contrast a very low level of perceived crowding.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Arnberger A, Brandenburger C (2007) Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions, and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Environ Manage 40:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnberger A, Haider W (2007) A comparison of global and actual measures of perceived crowding of urban forest visitors. J Leis Res 39:668–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnberger A, Mann C (2008) Crowding in European forests: a review of recent research and implications for forest management and policy. Forestry 81(4):599–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnberger A, Haider W, Muhar A (2004) Social carrying capacity of an urban park in Vienna. In: Sievänen J et al. (eds.) Policies, methods and tools for visitor management. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas, June 16-20, 2004, Rovaniemi: 371–378

  • Arnberger A, Haider W, Brandenburger C (2005) Evaluating visitor-monitoring techniques: a comparison of counting and video observation data. Environ Manage 36:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton F, Clapés J, Marquès A, Priestley G (1996) The recreational use of beaches and consequences for the development of new trend in management: the case of the beaches of the metropolitan region of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Ocean Coast Manage 32:153–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole D, Hall T (2009) Perceived effects of setting attributes on visitor experiences in wilderness: variation with situational context and visitor characteristics. Environ Manage 44:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly M, Vaske J, Whittaker D, Shelby B (2000) Toward an understanding of norm prevalence: a comparative analysis of 20 years of research. Environ Manage 25:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essink K, Dettmann C, Farke H, Laursen K, Lüerßen G, Marencic H, Wiersinga, W eds. (2005) Wadden sea quality status report 2004. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 19. Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group, Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany

  • European Union (2001) Defining, measuring and evaluating carrying capacity in European tourism destination. Final report. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/iczm/pdf/tcca_en.pdf. Accessed November 2009

  • Ewert AW (1998) A comparison of urban-proximate and urban-distant wilderness users on selected variables. Environ Manage 22:927–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredman P, Hörnsten L (2004) Social capacity and visitor satisfaction in National Park Tourism. The European Tourism Research Institute, Mid Sweden University

  • Gätje C, Möller A, Feige M (2002) Visitor management by visitor monitoring? Methodological approach and empirical results from the wadden sea national park in Schleswig-Holstein. In: Arnberger A, Brandenburg C, Muhar A (eds.) Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas, Conference Proceedings: 68–73

  • Graefe A, Vaske J, Kuss F (1984) Social carrying capacity: an integration and synthesis of twenty years of research. Leis Sci 6:395–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramann J (1982) Toward a behavioural theory of crowding in outdoor recreation: an evaluation and synthesis of research. Leis Sci 5:109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt W, Backlund E, Bixler R (2004) Experience use history, place bonding and resource substitution of trout anglers during recreation engagements. J Leis Res 36:356–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurado E, Dantas A, Pereira da Silva C (2009) Coastal zone management: tools for establishing a set of indicators to assess beach carrying capacity (Costa de Sol-Spain). J Coast Res SI 56:1125–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalisch D, Klaphake A (2007) Visitors' satisfaction and perception of crowding in a German National Park: a case study on the island of Hallig Hooge. For Snow Landsc Res 81:109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning R (1999) Studies in outdoor recreation: search and research for satisfaction. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning R (2007) Parks and carrying capacity. Commons without tragedy. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning R, Valliere W, Wang B, Jacobi C (1999) Crowding norms: alternative measurement approaches. Leis Sci 21:97–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira da Silva C (2002) Beach carrying capacity assessment: How important is it? J Coast Res, SI: 190–197

  • Pigram J, Jenkins J (1999) Outdoor recreation management. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecken G (1982) Die Halligen im Wandel. Institut für Regionale Forschung und Information im Deutschen Grenzverein e.V

  • Schreyer R, Roggenbuck J (1978) The influence of experience expectations on crowding perceptions and social-psychological carrying capacities. Leis Sci 1:373–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl I, Tisdell C (1999) Carrying capacity reconsidered: From Malthus' population theory to cultural carrying capacity. Ecol Econ 31:395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelby B (1980) Crowding model for backcountry recreation. Land Economics 56(1):43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelby B, Heberlein T, Vaske J, Alfano G (1983) Expectations, preferences, and feeling crowded in recreation activities. Leis Sci 6:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelby B, Vaske J, Heberlein T (1989) Comparative analysis of crowding in multiple locations: results from fifteen years of research. Leis Sci 11:269–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowman M (1987) A procedure for assessing recreational carrying capacity of coastal resort areas. Landsc Urb Plan 14:331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokols D (1978) Environmental psychology. Annu Rev Psych 29:253–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng Y-P, Kyle G, Shafer C, Graefe A, Bradle T, Schuett M (2009) Exloring the crowding-satisfaction relationship in recreational boating. Environ Manage 43:496–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske J, Donnelly M (2002) Generalizing the encounter-norm-crowding relationship. Leis Sci 24:255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske J, Shelby L (2008) Crowding as a descriptive indicator and an evaluative standard: results from 30 years of research. Leis Sci 30:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Economics, Institute for Landscape and Environmental Planning, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. EB 4-2, Strasse des 17. Juni 145, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    Dennis Kalisch

Authors
  1. Dennis Kalisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Kalisch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalisch, D. Relevance of crowding effects in a coastal National Park in Germany: results from a case study on Hamburger Hallig. J Coast Conserv 16, 531–541 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-012-0195-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-012-0195-2

Keywords

  • Social carrying capacity
  • Crowding effects
  • Reported encounter
  • Wadden Sea National Park
  • On-site survey