Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 565–571 | Cite as

Restoring nature in engineering structure: a modelling of Kuching bypass floodway

  • Darrien Yau Seng Mah


Engineering infrastructure development usually causes disturbances to environment. Rarely, the natural processes are restored in these physical structures. This paper highlights examples of coexistence of nature and engineering structure in flood control systems in US and Kong Kong, and treats the idea on a new project, a bypass flooding system in Kuching, Malaysia by computer simulation. When the Kuching floodway idles during normal days, it is modelled as a pond to match the surrounding peat swamp. The in-channel pond requires lower flow, allowing the downstream river its natural flows. The modelling simulation shows plausible results to put back nature in man-made system to restrain saline intrusion and problem of low flushing due to flow diversion. With that, it is time to call for the society, particularly the engineering communities to adopt a more nature-sensitive approach in engineering designs.


Bypass floodway Land drainage Modelling Nature Salinity Wetland 


  1. Davis SM, Childers DL, Lorenz JJ, Wanless HR, Hopkins TE (2005) A conceptual model of ecological interactions in the mangroves estuaries of the Florida everglades. Wetlands 25:832–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Endreny TA (2003) Fluvial geomorphology module. UCAR COMET program and NOAA river forecast center,, Syracuse, NY
  3. Hey RD (1990) Environmental river engineering. Water Environ J 4(4):335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Holman IP, Hiscock KM (1998) Land drainage and saline intrusion in the coastal marshes of Northeast Norfolk. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 31:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hong Kong Drainage Services Department (2003) Environmental report 2003. Available from [accessed 27 April 2010]
  6. Jenny KK, Mah DYS, Putuhena FJ, Salim S (2007) Post-flood forensic analysis of Sungai Maong using infoworks river simulation (RS). J Inst Eng Malays IEM 68(4):41–46Google Scholar
  7. Jurutera Jasa Consulting Engineers (2006) Proposed flood mitigation design options for Batu Kitang and Batu Kawa urban centres along Sarawak River, Kuching, Sarawak. Final Report for the State Government of Sarawak, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Law PL, Law IN, Lau HH, Kho FWL (2007) Impacts of barrage flushing and flooding-in operations on upstream total suspended solids. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4:75–83Google Scholar
  9. Mah DYS, Lai SH, Chan RA@RB, Putuhena FJ (2010a) Investigative modelling of the flood bypass channel in Kuching, Sarawak by assessing its impacts on the inundations of Kuching-Batu Kawa-Bau Expressway. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, first published on 23 June 2010 (iFirst), doi: 10.1080/15732471003770167
  10. Mah DYS, Bateni N, Putuhena FJ, Lai SH (2010b) Modelling of pumping station in conjunction with Kuching Barrage, Malaysia for flood mitigation. Asian J Water Environ Pollut 7(1):101–106Google Scholar
  11. Myers N (1988) Environmental degradation and some economic consequences in the Philippines. Environ Conserv 15:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nielsen DL, Brock MA, Rees GN, Baldwin DS (2003) Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in Australia. Aust J Bot 51:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ritzema HP (2007) The role of drainage in the wise use of tropical peatlands. In: Carbon-climate-human interaction on tropical peatland, Proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Tropical Peatland, Yogyakarta, Indonesia on 27–29 August, EU CARBOBEAT and ReSTORPEAT Partnership, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia and University of Leicester, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  14. Salim S, Mah DYS, Sumok P, Lai SH (2009) Water quality monitoring of Maong River, Malaysia. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Manage 162(1):37–42Google Scholar
  15. Santos JM, Ferreira MT, Godinho FN, Bochechas J (2005) Efficacy of a nature-like bypass channel in a Portuguese lowland river. J Appl Ichthyol 21(5):381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shannon NR, Mackinnon PA, Hamill G (2005) Modelling of saline intrusion in marine outfalls. Marit Eng 158:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sommer T, Harrell B, Nobriga M, Brown R, Moyle P, Kimmerer W, Schemel L (2001) California’s Yolo bypass: evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife and agriculture. Fisheries 26:6–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Turcotte R, Fortin J-P, Rousseau AN, Massicotte S, Villeneuve J-P (2001) Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network. J Hydrol 240(3–4):225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wallingford Software (2008) Manual for infoworks river simulation (RS) version 9.0Google Scholar
  20. Wang G, Qian J, Cheng G, Lai Y (2001) Eco-environmental degradation and causal analysis in the source region of the Yellow River. Environ Geol 40:884–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Winn KO, Saynor MJ, Eliot MJ, Elio I (2006) Saltwater intrusion and morphological change at the mouth of the East Alligator River, Northern Territory. J Coast Res 22(1):137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wösten H (2005) Wise use of tropical peatlands: focus on Borneo. Executive summary of the project “Strategies for Implementing Sustainable Management of Peatlands in Borneo (STRAPEAT)”. International Cooperation with Developing Countries, Contract number ICA4-CT-2001-10098, Alterra, Wageningen, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Young KR (1994) Roads and the environmental degradation of tropical montane forests. Conserv Biol 8(4):972–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zimmerer KS (1993) Soil erosion and social (dis)courses in Cochabamba, Bolivia: perceiving the nature of environmental degradation. Econ Geogr 69:312–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.River Engineering and Urban Drainage Research Centre (REDAC)Universiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations