Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 139–151 | Cite as

Topsoil inversion as a restoration measure in sand dunes, early results from a UK field-trial

  • M. Laurence M. Jones
  • Kim Norman
  • Peter M. Rhind
Article

Abstract

Over-stabilisation and eutrophication affect many dune systems in north-west Europe. This leads to lower diversity of typical dune species and an accumulation of soil nutrients. Existing management techniques to remove excess nutrients include mowing, with removal of cuttings, and turf stripping. A new restoration technique called topsoil inversion or deep ploughing may also be able to counter some of the negative effects of eutrophication. It simulates the burial of established soils with fresh mineral sand, by inverting the soil profile. A trial was carried out on two small blocks of eutrophic dune grassland in North Wales, UK. Nutrient-rich surface soils were buried beneath mineral sub-sand using a double-bladed plough, designed to plough to depths of up to 100 cm. Results show that the organic soil horizons were buried to a depth of 80 cm, and covered with 40–50 cm of mineral sand. The pH and organic matter of the surface layers became comparable to those of mobile dunes. Fifteen months after ploughing, bare sand cover was still 70–90%, but significant sand loss through wind erosion resulted in a thinning of the mineral sand over-burden, leaving the buried organic layer closer to the surface. Natural vegetation colonisation was slow, with the first surviving plants observed after 8 months. The majority of species present at 15 months were present before ploughing and had regenerated from rhizomes or root fragments. The effect of excluding disturbance caused by rabbits, people and dogs was assessed within fenced areas. After 11 months, vegetation cover was greater in the fenced areas than in plots exposed to disturbance, therefore disturbance replaced physical conditions as the dominant influence on plant growth and establishment. These early results suggest the trial has been partially successful, but that topsoil inversion could be combined with other methods such as turf stripping or by stabilisation of the ploughed surface by planting with pioneer species, depending on the ultimate restoration goal.

Keywords

Eutrophication Deep ploughing Succession Colonisation Grassland Rabbits 

References

  1. Allen SE (1989) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison M, Ausden M (2004) Successful use of topsoil removal and soil amelioration to create heathland vegetation. Biol Conserv 120:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arens SM, Geelen L (2006) Dune landscape rejuvenation by intended destabilisation in the Amsterdam water supply dunes. J Coast Res 22(5):1094–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arens SM, Slings Q, de Vries CN (2004) Mobility of a remobilised parabolic dune in Kennemerland, The Netherlands. Geomorphology 59(1–4):175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker JP, Berendse F (1999) Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends Ecol Evol 14(2):63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakker J, Elzinga J, de Vries Y (2002) Effects of long-term cutting in a grassland system: perspectives for restoration of plant communities on nutrient-poor soils. Appl Veg Sci 5(1):107–120Google Scholar
  7. Ball DF (1964) Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soils. J Soil Sci 15:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw AD (1996) Underlying principles of restoration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doody JP (1989) Management for nature conservation. Proc R Soc Edinb 96:247–265Google Scholar
  10. Glen E (2008) Evaluation of topsoil inversion for habitat creation or restoration. PhD Thesis, Manchester Metropolitan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Glen E, Price EAC, Caporn SJM, Carroll JA, Jones MLM, Scott R (2007) A novel technique for restoring species-rich grassland. In: Hopkins JJ, Duncan AJ, McCracken DI, Peel S, Tallowin JRB (eds.), High value grassland: providing biodiversity, a clean environment and premium products. Occasional Symposium No. 38. Proceedings of the BGS/BES/BSAS Conference, Keele University, UK. 17–19 April 2007. British Grassland Society, pp. 221–224.Google Scholar
  12. Grootjans AP, Everts H, Bruin K, Fresco L (2001) Restoration of wet dune slacks on the Dutch Wadden Sea islands: Recolonization after large-scale sod cutting. Restor Ecol 9(2):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grootjans AP, Geelen HWT, Jansen AJM, Lammerts EJ (2002) Restoration of coastal dune slacks in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 478(1–3):181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hugenholtz CH, Wolfe SA (2005) Recent stabilization of active sand dunes on the Canadian prairies and relation to recent climate variations. Geomorphology 68:131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huiskes AHL (1979) Biological flora of the British Isles: Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link. (Psamma arenaria (L.) Roem. et Schult.; Calamagrostis arenaria (L.) Roth). J Ecol 67:363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones MLM, Wallace HL, Norris D, Brittain SA, Haria S, Jones RE, Rhind PM, Reynolds BR, Emmett BA (2004) Changes in vegetation and soil characteristics in coastal sand dunes along a gradient of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Plant Biol 6(5):598–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones MLM, Reynolds B, Brittain SA, Norris DA, Rhind PM, Jones RE (2006) Complex hydrological controls on wet dune slacks: the importance of local variability. Sci Total Environ 372(1):266–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones MLM, Sowerby A, Williams DL, Jones RE (2008) Factors controlling soil development in sand dunes: evidence from a coastal dune soil chronosequence. Plant Soil 307(1–2):219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones MLM, Sowerby A, Rhind PM (2009). Factors affecting vegetation establishment and development in a sand dune chronosequence at Newborough Warren, North Wales. Journal of Coastal Conservation. doi:10.1007/s11852-009-0071-xGoogle Scholar
  20. Kooijman AM, Dopheide JCR, Sevink J, Takken I, Verstraten JM (1998) Nutrient limitations and their implications on the effects of atmospheric deposition in coastal dunes; lime-poor and lime- rich sites in the Netherlands. J Ecol 86(3):511–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Landlife (2007) Breaking new ground. Topsoil inversion for improved tree establishment and biodiversity gain on eutrophicated soils., Landlife, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  22. Marrs R (2002) Manipulating the chemical environment of the soil. In: Perrow MR, Davy AJ (eds) Handbook of ecological restoration volume 1: Principles of restoration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Marrs RH, Gough MW (1989) Soil fertility — a potential problem for habitat restoration. In: Buckley GP (ed) Biological habitat reconstruction. Wiley, pp 29–44Google Scholar
  24. Matthesen P, Damgaard C (1997) Reolpløjning [Deep ploughing]. Videnblade Park-og Landsabsserien no. 4.1–3. AugustGoogle Scholar
  25. Novak J, Konvicka M (2006) Proximity of valuable habitats affects succession patterns in abandoned quarries. Ecol Eng 26(2):113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Packham JR, Willis AJ (1997) Ecology of dunes, salt marsh and shingle. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Perkins DF (1978) The distribution and transfer of energy and nutrients in the Agrostis-Festuca grassland ecosystem. In: Heal OW, Perkins DF (eds) Production ecology of British moors and montane grasslands. Ecological Studies 27. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 374–395Google Scholar
  28. Plassmann K, Edwards-Jones G, Jones MLM (2009) The effects of low levels of nitrogen deposition and grazing on dune grassland. Sci Total Environ 407:1391–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Provoost S, Jones MLM, Edmondson SE (2009). Changes in landscape and vegetation of coastal dunes in northwest Europe: a review. Journal of Coastal Conservation. doi:10.1007/s11852-009-0068-5Google Scholar
  30. Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Hopkins A, Walker KJ, Sparks TH, Burke MJW, Peel S (2002) Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. J Appl Ecol 39:294–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ranwell D (1960) Newborough Warren, Anglesey. 3. Changes in the vegetation on parts of the dune system after the loss of rabbits by myxomatosis. J Ecol 48:385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ranwell DS, Boar R (1986) Coast dune management guide. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  33. Remke E, Brouwer E, Kooijman AM, Blindow I, Esselink H, Roelefs JGM (2009) Even low to medium nitrogen deposition impacts vegetation of dry, coastal dunes around the Baltic Sea. Environ Pollut 157:792–800Google Scholar
  34. Rhind PM, Blackstock TH, Hardy HS, Jones RE, Sandison W (2001) The evolution of Newborough Warren dune system with particular reference to the past four decades. In: Houston JA, Edmondson SE, Rooney PJ (eds) Coastal dune management. Shared experience of European Conservation Practice. Proceedings of the European Symposium Coastal Dunes of the Atlantic Biogeographical Region Southport, northwest England, September 1998. Liverpool University Press, pp 345–379Google Scholar
  35. Rhind PM, Jones R, Jones MLM (2007) Confronting the threat of dune stabilization and soil development on the conservation status of sand dune systems in Wales. Proceedings of a conference in Bilbao on Dune managementGoogle Scholar
  36. Salisbury EJ (1922) The soils of Blakeney Point: a study of soil reaction and succession in relation to the plant covering. Ann Bot 36:391–431Google Scholar
  37. Salisbury EJ (1925) Note on the edaphic succession in some dune soils with special reference to the time factor. J Ecol 13(2):322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Stace CA (1995) New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Bury St Edmunds, SuffolkGoogle Scholar
  40. Stewart WDP, Pearson MC (1967) Fixation of Hippophae rhamnoides on dunes on the English coast. Plant Soil 26:348–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stuyfzand PJ (1993) Hydrochemistry and hydrology of the Coastal Dune area of the western Netherlands. PhD Thesis, Free University, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. Tahmasebi Kohyani P, Bossuyt B, Bonte D, Hoffman M (2008) Importance of grazing and soil acidity for plant community composition and trait characterisation in coastal dune grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 11:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tallowin JRB, Smith REN (2001) Restoration of a Cirsio-Molinietum fen meadow on an agriculturally improved pasture. Restor Ecol 9(2):167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van den Berg LJL, Tomassen HBM, Roelofs JGM, Bobbink R (2005) Effects of nitrogen enrichment on coastal dune grassland: a mesocosm study. Environ Pollut 138(1):77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Dijk HWJ (1989) Ecological impact of drinking-water production in Dutch coastal dunes. In: van der Meulen F, Jungerius PD, Visser J (eds) Perspectives in coastal dune management. Proceedings of the European Symposium Leiden, September 7–11, 1987. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 163–182Google Scholar
  46. Westhoff V (1989) Dunes and dune management along the North Sea coasts. In: van der Meulen F, Jungerius PD, Visser J (eds) Perspectives in coastal dune management, pp 44–51. Proceedings of the European Symposium Leiden, September 7–11, 1987, The Netherlands. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, NLGoogle Scholar
  47. Willis AJ, Yemm EW (1961) Braunton Burrows: mineral nutrient status of the dune soils. J Ecol 49:377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson K (1960) The time factor in the development of dune soils at South Haven Peninsula, Dorset. J Ecol 48:341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolters M, Garbutt A, Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Carey PD (2008) Restoration of salt-marsh vegetation in relation to site suitability, species pool and dispersal traits. J Appl Ecol 45(3):904–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Laurence M. Jones
    • 1
  • Kim Norman
    • 2
  • Peter M. Rhind
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and HydrologyEnvironment Centre WalesBangorUK
  2. 2.BHP Billiton, Field Study CentreFlintshireUK
  3. 3.Countryside Council for Wales, Maes-y-FfynnonBangorUK

Personalised recommendations