Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coastal erosion management and the European principles of ICZM: local versus strategic perspectives

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Recommendation on Integrated Coastal Zone Management has six core principles. These form two groups, one concerned with strategic goals and one that has a local focus. The principles are presented as a menu of free-standing options, with no prioritization either within or between groups. In the case of coastal erosion management these characteristics result in irreconcilable conflicts, and actively hinder sustainable management of eroding coasts. The principles require clarification, and recognition that they are an indivisible integrated set which should not be used to select principles to advance a particular agenda. It is essential that the strategic principles are given priority, because only they can underpin a sustainable approach to the issue of coastal erosion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carter RWG, Johnston TW, McKenna J, Orford JD (1987) Sea-level, sediment supply and coastal changes: examples from the coast of Ireland. Prog Oceanogr 18(1–4):79–101, doi:10.1016/0079-6611(87)90027-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton KM (1993) Coastal Processes and Coastal Management. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JAG, McKenna J (2008a) Social Justice in coastal erosion management: the temporal and spatial dimensions. Geoforum 39(1):294–306, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JAG, McKenna J (2008b) Working with natural processes: the challenge for coastal protection strategies. Geogr J 174(4):315–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JAG, McKenna J, Jackson DWT, O’Connor M (2007) Mesoscale coastal behaviour related to morphological self-adjustment. Geology 35(1):187–190, doi:10.1130/G23016A.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty A (1997) Clifftop temple lifeline. Belfast Telegraph 18 Sept. 1997

  • Dutch Government Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and the Ministry of Economic Affairs (2005) EU Recommendation concerning the implementation of ICZM in Europe: report on implementation in the Netherlands. RWS RIKZ, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environment Agency) (2006) The Changing Face of Europe’s Coastal Areas. EEA Report 6/2006, Copenhagen

  • ETCTE (European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment) (2005) Measuring sustainable development at the coast. Report to the EU ICZM Expert Group by the Working Group on Indicators and Data led by the ETCTE

  • European Commission (1999) Lessons from the European Commission’s Demonstration Programme on Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004) Eurosion: Living with Coastal Erosion in Europe – Sediment and Space for Sustainability. Part 1—Major findings and Policy Recommendations of the EUROSION project. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union – “the Blue Book”. COM (2007) 575 final, October 2007. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

  • European Commission (2008) Communication from the Commission: Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: Achieving Common Principles in the EU. COM (2008) 791, November 2008. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council (2002) Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2002 concerning the implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe (2002/413/EC). OJ L148 06.06.2002 p.24. Official Journal of the European Communities, 24–27

  • Field BC, Field MK (2002) Environmental Economics. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerby M (2005) Adaptive management and local specificity within ICZM: A genuine stakeholder’s perspective. Coastal Concern Action Group (CCAG), Paper presented at CoastNet Conference, Adaptive Management and Local Specificity in ICZM, Edinburgh, Scotland, 22 September 2005. Available at www.happisburgh.org.uk. Accessed 11 Dec 2006

  • Marinet (2005) Shoreline Management Plans. Available at: http://www.marinet.org.uk/coastaldefences/smp.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • McKenna J, Cooper JAG (2006) Sacred cows in coastal management: The need for a ‘cheap and transitory’ model. Area 38(4):421–431, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00708.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna J, Cooper JAG, O’Hagan AM (2008) Managing by principle: A critical analysis of the European principles of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM). Mar Policy 32:941–955, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson A (2006) Living on the Edge. The Guardian 9 October 2006

  • North Norfolk District Council (2005) Shoreline Management Plan Position Statement. Available at http://www.marinet.org.uk/coastaldefences/smp.html#nnd. Accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • O’Connor M, Lymbery G, Cooper JAG, Gault J, McKenna J (2009) Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management. Mar Policy (in press)

  • Orford J, Jennings S (1998) The importance of different time-scale controls on coastal management strategy: the problem of Porlock gravel barrier, Somerset, UK. In: Hooke J (ed) Coastal Defence and Earth Science Conservation. Geological Society, London, pp 87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht Consult – Forschung & Beratung GmbH (2006) Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe: Final Report—revised version 1/12/2006. Cologne, Germany. Available at: http://www.rupprecht-consult.eu/iczm/. Accessed 1 Sept 2007

  • Scottish Executive (2002) Assessment of the effectiveness of local coastal management partnerships as a delivery mechanism for Integrated Coastal Zone Management. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, Report to Scottish Executive

    Google Scholar 

  • Taussik J, Ballinger R, Ball I, Carter D, Wilson R (2006) Adapting to Changing Coastlines and Rivers. Making Space for Water: Strand SD2 Taking forward a new Government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management. Developing a Broader Portfolio of Options to Deliver Flooding and Coastal Solutions. Preliminary Report to Defra, July 2006. Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ/fcd/policy/strategy/sd2/sd2rp1ex.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • The National Trust (2006) The National Trust Coastal Policy. Available at http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/. Accessed 13 Dec 2006

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was stimulated by discussions and research undertaken in the course of the COREPOINT (Coastal Research and Policy Integration) Project co-funded through EU-INTERREG III B North West Europe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John McKenna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKenna, J., Cooper, J.A.G. & O’Hagan, A.M. Coastal erosion management and the European principles of ICZM: local versus strategic perspectives. J Coast Conserv 13, 165–173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-008-0040-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-008-0040-9

Keywords

Navigation