Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship performance and social capital: a multi-level analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study advances research on sustainable corporate entrepreneurship performance and social capital by exploring how the development of unit-level employees’ internal network knowledge and firm-level top management team’s (TMT) external network knowledge affect the association between transformational leadership and sustainable corporate entrepreneurship performance. By analyzing data of 561 top managers, 760 managers, and 1563 employees from 282 units in 87 firms from the high technology and manufacturing industries, we found that transformational leaders were relevant to the growth of employees’ internal bridging knowledge ties behavior at the unit level and sustainable corporate entrepreneurial performance. However, such association was moderated by firm-level TMT’s external bridging knowledge ties behaviors such that the influence was stronger as firm-level TMT external bridging knowledge ties behaviors lessened. This reveals the relationship between an unrecognized cost of firm TMT’s external bridging ties behaviors and corporate entrepreneurship performance. Finally, the implications, limitations, and scope for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The manuscript has no associate data.

References

  • Acquaah M (2007) Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy. Strat Mgmt J 28(12):1235–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev 27(1):17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm Sci Q 45(3):425–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T (2008) The theory and practice of online learning, 2nd edn. Athabasca University Press, Edmonton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MH, Sun PY (2015) The downside of transformational leadership when encouraging followers to network. Leadersh Q 26(5):790–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson U, Cuervo-Cazurra A, Nielsen BB (2014) From the editors: explaining interaction effects within and across levels of analysis. J Int Bus Stud 45:1063–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall LG, Taylor SE (1997) A stitch in time: self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychol Bull 121(3):417–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker AB, Hetland J, Olsen OK, Espevik R (2022) Daily transformational leadership: a source of inspiration for follower performance? Eur Manag J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker AB, Xanthopoulou D, Demerouti E (2023) How does chronic burnout affect dealing with weekly job demands? A test of central propositions in JD-R and COR-theories. Appl Psychol 72(1):389–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkundi P, Harrison DA (2006) Ties, leaders, and time in teams: strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Acad Manag J 49(1):49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkundi P, Kilduff M (2006) The ties that lead: a social network approach to leadership. Leadersh Q 17(4):419–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RA, Tang J (2009) Entrepreneurs’ social skills and new venture performance: mediating mechanisms and cultural generality. J Manag 35(2):282–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass B (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Riggio RE (2006) Transformational leadership, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Avolio BJ (1995) Multifactor leadership questionnaire: manual leader form, rater, and scoring key for MLQ (Form 5x-Short). Mind Garden, Menlo Park

  • Batjargal B (2003) Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: a longitudinal study. Organ Stud 24(4):535–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baycan T, Öner Ö (2023) The dark side of social capital: a contextual perspective. Ann Reg Sci 70:779–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono JE, Anderson MH (2005) The advice and influence networks of transformational leaders. J Appl Psychol 90(6):1306–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono JE, Judge TA (2004) Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 89(5):901–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono JE, Foldes HJ, Vinson G, Muros JP (2007) Workplace emotions: the role of supervision and leadership. J Appl Psychol 92(5):1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass DJ, Butterfield KD, Skaggs BC (1998) Relationships and unethical behavior: a social network perspective. Acad Manage Rev 23(1):14–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccagnoli M, Graham SJ, Higgins MJ, Lee J (2010) Productivity and the role of complementary assets in firms’ demand for technology innovations. Ind Corp Chang 19(3):839–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesinger B, Gundolf K, Hughes M, Khedhaouria A, Montani F (2023) The bright and dark sides of the Dark Triad traits among senior managers: effects on organizational commitment. Rev Manag Sci 17(5):1731–1763

  • Chang YY, Hughes P, Hodgkinson I, Chang CY, Seih YT (2022) The antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship: multilevel, multisource evidence. Rev Manag Sci 16(2):355–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Liu H, Wei S, Gu J (2018) Top managers’ managerial ties, supply chain integration, and firm performance in China: a social capital perspective. Ind Mark Manag 74:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu W (2004) Are group-affiliated firms really more profitable than nonaffiliated? Small Bus Econ 22:391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros L, Deschamps B, Chirita GM, Geindre S (2022) Successful family firm succession: transferring external social capital to a shared-leadership team of siblings. J Fam Bus Strateg 13(3):100467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation: analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strateg Manage J 10(1):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz C, Messeghem MK, Catanzaro A (2022) Environmental entrepreneurship: a bibliometric perspective of the field. Int Entr Manag J 1–27

  • Dawson JF, Richter AW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. J Appl Psychol 91(4):917–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis DM, Saparito P (2006) Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: a theoretical framework. Entrep Theory Pract 30(1):41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq D, Dakhli M (2009) Personal strain and ethical standards of the self-employed. J Bus Ventur 24(5):477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derue DS, Nahrgang JD, Wellman N, Humphrey SE (2011) Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: an integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Pers Psychol 64:7–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrukh M, Ansari N, Raza A, Wu Y, Wang H (2022) Fostering employee’s pro-environmental behavior through green transformational leadership, green human resource management and environmental knowledge. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 179:121643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes AJ, Ferreira JJ (2022) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: a literature review and research agenda. Rev Manag Sci 16:189–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira JJ, Fernandes CI, Kraus S (2019) Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Rev Manag Sci 13:181–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Kolodinsky RW, Hochwarter WA, Kacmar CJ, Douglas C, Frink DD (2005) Development and validation of the political skill inventory. J Manage 31(1):126–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Firk S, Hanelt A, Oehmichen J, Wolff M (2021) Chief digital officers: an analysis of the presence of a centralized digital transformation role. J Manage Stud 58(7):1800–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Meca E, Ramón-Llorens MC, Martínez-Ferrero J (2023) Feminine expertise on board and environmental innovation: the role of critical mass. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00685-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic E, Honig B, Moore CB, Payne GT, Wright M (2013) Social capital and entrepreneurship: a schema and research agenda. Entrep Theory Pract 37(3):455–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giang H, Dung LT (2022) The effect of internal corporate social responsibility practices on firm performance: the mediating role of employee intrapreneurial behaviour. Rev Manag Sci 16:1035–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin VL, Bowler WM, Whittington JL (2009) A social network perspective on LMX relationships: accounting for the instrumental value of leader and follower networks. J Manag 35(4):954–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk P (2009) Entrepreneurship and organized crime: entrepreneurs in illegal business. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenglass ER (2002) Work stress, coping, and social support: implications for women’s occupational well-being. In: Nelson DL, Burke RJ (eds) Gender, work stress, and health. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 85–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben JR, Neveu JP, Paustian-Underdahl SC, Westman M (2014) Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J Manag 40(5):1334–1364

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC (1998) Corporate coherence and the top management team. In: Hambrick DC, Nadler DA, Tushrnan ML (eds) Navigating change: how CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp 123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manage Rev 9(2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton JC (2005) Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research. Hum Resour Manage Rev 15(1):21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll SE (1989) Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol 44(3):513–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll SE (1998) Stress, culture, and community: the psychology and philosophy of stress. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll SE (2001) The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl Psychol 50(3):337–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu D, Gu Q, Zhang Y (2023) Role modeling effects: how leader’s job involvement affects follower creativity. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 61(1):101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang R-C, Chung H, Siao J-S, Lin C-L (2012) Does the local rating agency provide reliable credit ratings? An empirical analysis from an emerging market. J Fixed Income 22(1):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG (2003) A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. J Manage 29(6):963–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack SL, Anderson AR (2002) The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. J Bus Ventur 17(5):467–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong SW, Chung JE (2023) Enhancing competitive advantage and financial performance of consumer-goods SMEs in export markets: how do social capital and marketing innovation matter? Asia Pac J Market Logist 35(1):74–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge TA, Piccolo RF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psychol 89(5):755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim PH, Aldrich HE (2005) Social capital and entrepreneurship. Found Trends(r) Entrep 1(2): 55–104

  • Kiss AN, Cortes AF, Herrmann P (2022) CEO proactiveness, innovation, and firm performance. Leadersh Q 33(3):101545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhempel J, Beugelsdijk S, Klasing MJ (2022) The changing role of social capital during the venture creation process: a multilevel study. Entrep Theory Pract 46(2):297–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Rigtering C (2010) Corporate entrepreneurship as a company philosophy: the case of ‘&samhoud.’ Int J Entrep Innov 11(3):245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Roig-Tierno N, Bouncken RB (2019) Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci 13(3):519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanaj K, Johnson RE, Lee SM (2016) Benefits of transformational behaviors for leaders: a daily investigation of leader behaviors and need fulfillment. J Appl Psychol 101(2):237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang LD, Behl A, Dong NT, Temouri Y, Thu NH (2022) Effect of social capital on agribusiness diversification intention in the emerging market. J Intellect Cap 23(1):56–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R (2009) Social capital and business and management: setting a research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 11(3):247–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H (2022) Effects of innovation modes and network partners on innovation performance of young firms. Eur J Innov Manag 25(5):1288–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Chiaburu DS, Kirkman BL, Xie Z (2013a) Spotlight on the followers: an examination of moderators of relationships between transformational leadership and subordinates’ citizenship and taking charge. Pers Psychol 66(1):225–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang X, Huang L, Bai X (2013b) How does entrepreneurs’ social capital hinder new business development? A relational embeddedness perspective. J Bus Res 66(12):2418–2424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N (2001) Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin LH, Ho YL, Lin WHE (2013) Confucian and Taoist work values: an exploratory study of the Chinese transformational leadership behavior. J Bus Ethics 113:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SH, Scott BA, Matta FK (2019) The dark side of transformational leader behaviors for leaders themselves: a conservation of resources perspective. Acad Manage J 62(5):1556–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N (2000) Inequality in social capital. Contemp Sociol 29(6): 785–795

  • Liu X, Zhang L, Gupta A, Zheng X, Wu C (2022) Upper echelons and intra-organizational learning: how executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units. Strateg Manage J 43(11):2351–2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA (1999) The essence of leadership: the four keys to leading successfully. Lexington Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe KB, Kroeck KG, Sivasubramaniam N (1996) Effectiveness correlates of transformation and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadersh Q 7(3):385–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maran T, Furtner M, Liegl S, Kraus S, Sachse P (2019) In the eye of a leader: eye-directed gazing shapes perceptions of leaders’ charisma. Leadersh Q 30(6):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathey F, Lysova EI, Khapova SN (2023) How is social capital formed and leveraged in international careers? A systematic review and future research directions. Manage Rev Q 1–40

  • Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Adm Sci Q 51(2):262–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer I, Bartsch V, Ebers M (2011) The value of intra-organizational social capital: how it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organ Stud 32(2):157–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily B, Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strateg Manag J 20(12):1133–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra S, Hoffman JM, Sirias D (2001) TQM as a management strategy for the next millennia. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):855–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra A, Dixon AL, Brass DJ, Robertson B (2006) The social network ties of group leaders: implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organ Sci 17(1):64–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguélez E, Moreno R, Artís M (2011) Does social capital reinforce technological inputs in the creation of knowledge? Evidence from the Spanish regions. Reg Stud 45(8):1019–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strateg Manag J 4(3):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK (2018) Assessment of human resource capacity of construction companies in Nepal. J Adv Res Jour Mass Comm 5(4):14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Morales FX, Martínez-Fernández MT (2010) Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. J Small Bus Manag 48(2):258–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molines M, El Akremi A, Storme M, Celik P (2022) Beyond the tipping point: the curvilinear relationships of transformational leadership, leader–member exchange, and emotional exhaustion in the French police. Public Manag Rev 24(1):80–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montano D, Reeske A, Franke F, Hüffmeier J (2017) Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: a comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. J Organ Behav 38(3):327–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2017) Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables: user’s guide, 8th edn. Muthén & Muthén

  • Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23(2):242–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh H, Chung M-H, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties. Acad Manage J 47(6):860–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkazanc-Pan B (2022) Rethinking social capital: entrepreneurial ecosystems as contested communities. In: Eberhart RN, Lounsbury M, Aldrich HE (eds) Entrepreneurialism and society: consequences and meanings, vol 82. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 69–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Payne GT, Moore CB, Griffis SE, Autry CW (2011) Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. J Manage 37(2):491–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW, Luo Y (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro-macro link. Acad Manage J 43(3):486–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad Manage Rev 28(1):89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai KG, Hodgkinson GP, Kalyanaram G, Nair SR (2017) The negative effects of social capital in organizations: a review and extension. Int J Manag Rev 19(1):97–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido-Martos M, Gartzia L, Augusto-Landa J (2023) Transformational leadership and emotional intelligence: allies in the development of organizational affective commitment from a multilevel perspective and time-lagged data. Rev Manag Sci

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz LE, Amorós JE, Guerrero M (2023) Does gender matter for corporate entrepreneurship? A cross-countries study. Small Bus Econ 60(3):929–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad Manage J 44(2):219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek Z (2007) CEO tenure and organizational performance: an intervening model. Strateg Manag J 28(6):653–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad Manage J 44(2):316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam W, Elfring T (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: the moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Acad Manage J 51(1):97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stollberger J, Ali Al-Atwi A, De Cremer D (2023) Untangling the team social capital—team innovation link: the role of proportional task conflict as well as group-and differentiated individual-focused transformational leadership. Hum Relat 76(6):871–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Adm Sci Q 44(2):315–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo ST, Reed KK, Ly K (2014) Human resource involvement in developing intellectual capital. Serv Ind J 34(15):1219–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper JM, Koós T, Ibanez-Sandoval O, Tecuapetla F, Faust TW, Assous M (2018) Heterogeneity and diversity of striatal GABAergic interneurons: update 2018. Front Neuroanat 12:91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana A (2008) Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strateg Manag J 29(3):251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourish D (2013) The dark side of transformational leadership: a critical perspective. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tourish D (2014) Leadership, more or less? A processual, communication perspective on the role of agency in leadership theory. Leadership 10(1):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Acad Manage J 41(4):464–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ul zia N, Burita L, Yang Y (2023) Inter-organizational social capital of firms in developing economies and industry 4.0 readiness: the role of innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Rev Manag Sci 17:661–682

  • Van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB (2013) A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: back to the drawing board? Acad Manag Ann 7(1):1–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Burg E, Cornelissen J, Stam W, Jack S (2022) Advancing qualitative entrepreneurship research: leveraging methodological plurality for achieving scholarly impact. Entrep Theory Pract 46(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani V, Green SG, Schleicher DJ (2010) Well-connected leaders: the impact of leaders’ social network ties on LMX and members’ work attitudes. J Appl Psychol 95(6):1071–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C, Weber B (2011) Exploring the antecedents of social liabilities. J Bus Ventur 26(2):255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff H-G, Moser K (2009) Effects of networking on career success: a longitudinal study. J Appl Psychol 94(1):196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Shamim S, Herath DB (2023) The evolution of HRM practices: big data, data analytics, and new forms of work. Rev Manag Sci 17:1937–1942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates VA, Vardaman JM, Chrisman JJ (2023) Social network research in the family business literature: a review and integration. Small Bus Econ 60:1323–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Z, Sun UY, Effinger AL, Zhang J (2023) Being on the same page matters: a meta-analytic investigation of leader–member exchange (LMX) agreement. J Appl Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Covin JG (1995) Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. J Bus Ventur 10(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad Manage J 43(5):925–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng J, Ren J (2022) How does green entrepreneurship affect environmental improvement? Empirical findings from 293 enterprises. Int Entre Manag J 18(1):409–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Bartol KM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad Manage J 53(1):107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Huang H, Chen X, Tian F (2023) Functional diversity of top management teams and firm performance in SMEs: a social network perspective. Rev Manag Sci 17(1):259–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Ying Chang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Scales

Appendix: Scales

1.1 Unit-level general managers’ transformational leadership

The unit general manager:

  1. 1.

    Instills pride in being associated with them

  2. 2.

    Goes beyond their own self-interest for the good of our group

  3. 3.

    Acts in ways that builds my respect

  4. 4.

    Displays a sense of power and confidence

  5. 5.

    Talks to us about their most important values and beliefs

  6. 6.

    Specifies the importance of having a strong sense of purpose

  7. 7.

    Considers the moral and ethical consequences of their decisions

  8. 8.

    Emphasizes the importance of having a collective sense of mission

  9. 9.

    Talks optimistically about the future

  10. 10.

    Expresses their confidence that we will achieve our goals

  11. 11.

    Talks enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished

  12. 12.

    Articulates a compelling vision of the future

  13. 13.

    Re-examines critical assumptions to question whether they are appropriate

  14. 14.

    Seeks differing perspectives when solving problems

  15. 15.

    Suggests new ways of looking at how we do our jobs

  16. 16.

    Gets me to look at problems from many different angles

  17. 17.

    Treats me as an individual rather than just a member of a group

  18. 18.

    Focuses me on developing my strengths

  19. 19.

    Spends time teaching and coaching me

  20. 20.

    Treats each of us as individuals with different needs, abilities, and aspirations

1.2 Unit-level employees’ internal bridging ties

Members of this unit:

  1. 1.

    Vary widely in their areas of expertise

  2. 2.

    Have a variety of different backgrounds and experiences

  3. 3.

    Have skills and abilities that complement each other’s

1.3 Firm-level TMT’s external bridging ties

  1. 1.

    Top managers at buyer firms

  2. 2.

    Top managers at supplier firms

  3. 3.

    Top managers at competitor firms

  4. 4.

    Political leaders in various levels of the government

  5. 5.

    Officials in industrial bureaus

  6. 6.

    Officials in regulatory and supporting organizations such as tax bureaus, state banks, commercial administration bureaus, and the like

1.4 Environmental complexity

  1. 1.

    Competition in our local market is intense

  2. 2.

    Our organizational unit has relatively strong competitors

  3. 3.

    Competition in our local market is extremely high

  4. 4.

    Price competition is a hallmark of our local market

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, YY., Lin, YM., Chang, TW. et al. Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship performance and social capital: a multi-level analysis. Rev Manag Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00690-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00690-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation