Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transgenerational entrepreneurship in family firms: a configurational approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research is to understand why some family firms perform better than others. To do so different configurations are identified based on familiness resources such as human, social, and financial capital, as well as the degree of entrepreneurial orientation that are considered to impact family firms’ performance and transgenerational survival. We test our theoretical contention on a sample of 1,344 family firms from 21 countries through fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Our main findings suggest that there are several configurations of resources and entrepreneurial orientation that increase the level of family firm performance. In three out of the seven main configurations, family firm specific resources alone lead to better financial performance, while the other four rely on entrepreneurial orientation combined with family firm specific resources. All identified configurations relate to different degrees of family involvement and thus emphasize the heterogeneity of family firms and their paths to financial performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev 27(1):17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich HE, Cliff JE (2003) The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. J Bus Ventur 18(5):573–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Mansi SA, Reeb DM (2003) Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. J Fin Econ 68:263–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle J-L, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG, Very P (2007) The Development of Organizational Social Capital: Attributes of Family Firms. J Manag Stud 44(1):73–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astrachan JH, Klein SB, Smyrnios KX (2002) The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: A Proposal for Solving the Family Business Definition Problem1. Fam Bus Rev 15(1):45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basco R (2017) Where do you want to take your family firm?” A theoretical and empirical exploratory study of family business goals. Bus Res Quart 20(1):28–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Basco R, Calabrò A, Campopiano G (2019) Transgenerational entrepreneurship around the world: Implications for family business research and practice. J Fam Bus Strat 10(4):100249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baù M, Chirico F, Pittino D, Backman M, Klaesson J (2019) Roots to Grow: Family Firms and Local Embeddedness in Rural and Urban Contexts. Entrep Theory Pract 43(2):360–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beritelli P (2011) Cooperation among prominent actors in a tourist destination. Ann of Tour Res 38(2):607–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichler BF, Kallmuenzer A, Peters M, Petry T, Clauss T (2021) Regional entrepreneurial ecosys-tems: How family firm embeddedness triggers ecosystem development. Rev of Man Sc, online first

  • Bouncken RB, Pluschke BD, Pesch R, Kraus S (2016) Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies. Rev Manag Sci 10(2):381–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrò A, Santulli R, Torchia M, Gallucci C (2021) Entrepreneurial Orientation and Family Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of TMT Identity-Based and Knowledge-Based Faultlines. Entrep Theory Pract 45(4):838–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JC, Cole MS, Ring JK, Blettner DP (2011) A Measure of Variations in Internal Social Capital among Family Firms. Entrep Theory Pract 35(6):1207–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra Y, Styles C, Wilkinson I (2009) The recognition of first time international entrepreneurial opportunities: Evidence from firms in knowledge-based industries. Int Mark Rev 26(1):30–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang M-L, Cheng C-F (2014) How balance theory explains high-tech professionals’ solutions of enhancing job satisfaction. J Bus Res 67(9):2008–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C-F, Chang M-L, Li C-S (2013) Configural paths to successful product innovation”. J Bus Res 6612:2561–2573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirico F, Sirmon DG, Sciascia S, Mazzola P (2011) Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 5(4):307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirico F, Nordqvist M (2010) Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. Int Small Bus J 28(5):487–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Massis AD, Frattini F, Wright M (2015) The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation. J Prod Innov Manage 32(3):310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Pearson AW, Barnett T (2012) Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family–Centered Non–Economic Goals in Small Firms. Entrep Theory Pract 36(2):267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Steier L(2005) Sources and Consequences of Distinctive Familiness: An Introduction.Entrep Theory Pract(3):237–247

  • Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, De Massis A, Wang H (2018) Reflections on family firm goals and the assessment of performance. J Fam Bus Strat 9(2):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Steier LP, Rau SB (2012) Sources of Heterogeneity in Family Firms: An Introduction. Entrep Theory Pract 36(6):1103–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Green KM, Slevin DP (2006) Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Sales Growth Rate Relationship. Entrep Theory Pract 30(1):57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strateg Manag J 10(1):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Wales WJ (2019) Crafting High-Impact Entrepreneurial Orientation Re-search: Some Suggested Guidelines. Entrep Theory Pract 43(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz C, Nordqvist M (2012) Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: a generational perspective. Small Bus Econ 38(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis A, Kotlar J, Campopiano G, Cassia L (2015) The Impact of Family Involvement on SMEs’ Performance: Theory and Evidence. J Small Bus Manag 53(4):924–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW, Sarathy R (2008) Resource Configuration in Family Firms: Linking Resources, Strategic Planning and Technological Opportunities to Performance. J Manag Stud 45(1):26–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Family Firm Institute (2017) Global Data Points. Retrieved from the FFI website on November 27, 2017: http://www.ffi.org/page/globaldatapoints

  • Filser M, Eggers F, Kraus S, Málovic É (2014) The effect of financial resource availability on entrepreneurial orientation, customer orientation and firm performance in an international context: an empirical analysis from Austria and Hungaria. J East Eur Manag Stud 19(1):7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filser M, De Massis A, Gast J, Kraus S, Niemand T (2017) Tracing the roots of innovatiness in family SMEs: The effect of family functionality and socioemotional wealth. J Prod Innov Manag 35(4):609–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank H, Kessler A, Rusch T, Suess–Reyes J, Weismeier–Sammer D (2017) Capturing the Familiness of Family Businesses: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS). Entrep Theory Pract 41(5):709–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallucci C, Santulli R, Calabrò A (2015) Does family involvement foster or hinder firm performance? The missing role of family-based branding strategies. J Fam Bus Strat 6(3):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Castro R, Casasola MJ (2011) A set-theoretic analysis of the components of family involvement in publicly listed and major unlisted firms. J Fam Bus Strat 2(1):15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Ramos R, Díaz-Díaz B, García-Olalla M (2017) Independent directors, large shareholders and firm performance: the generational stage of family businesses and the socioemotional wealth approach. Rev Manag Sci 11:119–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía LR, Haynes KT, Núñez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJL, Moyano-Fuentes J (2007) Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Adm Sci Q 52(1):106–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía LR, Herrero I(2022) Back to square one: The measurement of Socioemotional Wealth (SEW). J Fam Bus Strat, online first.

  • Habbershon TG, Nordqvist M, Zellweger TM (2010) Transgenerational entrepreneurship. In: Nordqvist M, Zellweger TM (eds) Transgenerational Entrepreneurship. Exploring growth and performance in family firms across generations (1–38). Edward Elgar Publishing, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon TG, Pistrui J (2002) Enterprising Families Domain: Family-Influenced Ownership Groups in Pursuit of Transgenerational Wealth. Fam Bus Rev 15(3):223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon TG, Williams M, MacMillan IC (2003) A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. J Bus Ventur 18(4):451–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon TG, Williams ML (1999) A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms. Fam Bus Rev 12(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjielias E, Christofi M, Vrontis D, Khan H (2022) Social impact through family firms’ interorganizational relationships within a community and a cooperative: An embedded view of stewardship. J of Bus Res 139:584–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Linares R, López-Fernández MC (2018) Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Family Firm: Mapping the Field and Tracing a Path for Future Research. Fam Bus Rev 31(3):318–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Trasobares A, Galve-Górriz C (2016) The influence of family control on decisions regarding the specialization and diversification of business groups. BRQ Bus Res Q 19(2):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero I (2018) How Familial Is Family Social Capital? Analyzing Bonding Social Capital in Family and Nonfamily Firms. Fam Bus Rev 31(4):441–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth C, Kessler A (2006) Measuring Success in Family Businesses: The Concept of Configurational Fit. Fam Bus Rev 19(2):115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes M, Cesinger B, Cheng CF, Schuessler F, Kraus S (2019) A configurational analysis of network and knowledge variables explaining Born Globals’ and late internationalizing SMEs’ international performance. Ind Mark Manag 80:172–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irava W, Moores K (2010) Resources supporting entrepreneurial orientation in multigenerational family firms. Int Jof Entrepr Vent 2:222–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz P, Combs JG, Rau SB (2015) Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 30(11):29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz P, Dyer WG (2017) Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Disentangling Family Heterogeneity to Advance Family Business Research. Fam Bus Rev 30(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallmuenzer A, Kraus S, Peters M, Steiner J, Cheng CF (2019) Entrepreneurship in tourism firms: A mixed-methods analysis of performance driver configurations. Tour Manag 74:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallmuenzer A, Strobl A, Peters M (2018) Tweaking the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in family firms: the effect of control mechanisms and family-related goals. Rev Manag Sci 12(4):855–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent RA, Argouslidis PC (2005) Shaping Business Decisions Using Fuzzy-Set Analysis: Service Elimination Decisions. J Mark Manag 21(5–6):641–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein SB, Astrachan JH, Smyrnios KX (2005) The F–PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, Validation, and Further Implication for Theory. Entrep Theory Pract 29(3):321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotlar J, De Massis A (2013) Goal Setting in Family Firms: Goal Diversity, Social Interactions, and Collective Commitment to Family–Centered Goals. Entrep Theory Pract 37(6):1263–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Mensching H, Calabrò A, Cheng CF, Filser M (2016) Family firm internationalization: A configurational approach. J Bus Res 69(11):5473–5478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Schüssler M (2018a) Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method. Int Entrep Manag J 14(1):15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser PM, Davis J (2010) Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Unique Impact of Innovativeness, Proactiveness, and Risk-taking. J Small Bus Entrepreneurship 23(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Kallmuenzer A, Stieger D, Peters M, Calabrò A (2018b) Entrepreneurial paths to family firm performance. J of Bus Res 88:382–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Sahoo S, Lim WM, Kraus S, Bamel U (2022) Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview. Tecnol Forecast Soc Change 178:121599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Linares R, López-Fernández MC (2018) Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Family Firm: Mapping the Field and Tracing a Path for Future Research. Fam Bus Rev 31(3):318–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller I, Miller D, Lester RH (2011) Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organ Sci 22(3):704–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner M, Haber S (2001) Performance factors of small tourism ventures: The interface of tourism, entrepreneurship and the environment. J Bus Ventur 16(1):77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Cogliser CC, Schneider DR (2009) Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: An Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 33(1):47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani Y, Lakhal L (2015) Exploring the family effect on firm performance: The impact of internal social capital dimensions on family firm performance. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 21(6):898–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzi C (2011) Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges. J Fam Bus Strat 2(3):166–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merino F, Monreal-Pérez J, Sánchez-Marín G (2015) Family SMEs’ Internationalization: Disentangling the Influence of Familiness on Spanish Firms’ Export Activity. J Small Bus Manag 53(4):1164–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strateg Manag J 4(3):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2006) Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities. Fam Bus Rev 19(1):73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Bullon F, Sanchez-Bueno MJ, Suárez-González I (2018) Diversification Decisions among Family Firms: The Role of Family Involvement and Generational Stage. Bus Res Quart 21(1):39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubaum DO, Kammerlander N, Brigham KH (2019) Capturing Family Firm Heterogeneity: How Taxonomies and Typologies Can Help the Field Move Forward. Fam Bus Rev 32(2):106–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel PC, Kim KY, Devaraj S, Li M (2018) Family Ties that B(l)ind: Do Family-Owned Franchisees Have Lower Financial Performance than Nonfamily-Owned. Franchisees? J Retail 94(2):231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters M, Kallmuenzer A, Buhalis D (2019) Hospitality entrepreneurs managing quality of life and business growth. Curr Issues Tour 22(16):2014–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittino D, Martínez AB, Chirico F, Galván RS (2018) Psychological ownership, knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: The moderating role of governance heterogeneity. J of Bus Res 84:312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhakka V(2002) Entrepreneurial business opportunity recognition: Relationships between intellectual and social capital, environmental dynamism, opportunity recognition behavior, and performance. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu, Finland

  • Pukall TJ, Calabrò A (2014) The Internationalization of Family Firms: A Critical Review and Integrative Model. Fam Bus Rev 27(2):103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC(2017) User’s Guide to Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis” Retrieved from www.fsqca.com. doi:www.fsqca.com

  • Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):761–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford MW, Kuratko DF, Holt DT (2008) Examining the Link between ‘Familiness’ and Performance: Can the F–PEC Untangle the Family Business Theory Jungle? Entrep Theory Pract 32(6):1089–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN, Buchholtz AK (2001) Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence”. Organ Sci 12(2):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P (2008) Commentary: Familiness: Capital Stocks and Flows between Family and Business. Entrep Theory Pract 32(6):971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Chrisman JJ (1999) Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 23(3):11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieger P, Zellweger T, Nason RS, Clinton E (2011) Portfolio entrepreneurship in family firms: a resource-based perspective. Strateg Entrepreneurship J Vol 5(4):327–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon DG, Hitt MA (2003) Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27(4):339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A, Hitt MA (2016) Why Can’t a Family Business Be More Like a Nonfamily Business? Modes of Professionalization in Family Firms. Fam Bus Rev 25(1):58–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner LM, Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA, Hoy F (2012) The entrepreneuring family: a new paradigm for family business research. Small Bus Econ 38(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales WJ, Covin JG, Monsen E (2020) Entrepreneurial orientation: The necessity of a multilevel conceptualization. Strat Entrep J 14(1):639–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D, Block JH, Miller D, Schwens C, Xi G (2015) A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt. J Fam Bus Strat 6(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedeler C, Kammerlander N (2021) Learning the ropes of entrepreneurship: understanding internal corporate venturing for family firms from an entrepreneurial learning perspective. Rev Manag Sci 15:669–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (2018) Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms: The Wellspring of the Regenerative Capability. Fam Bus Rev 31(2):216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zona F (2016) CEO leadership and board decision processes in family-controlled firms: comparing family and non-family CEOs. Small Bus Econ 47(3):735–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IPAG Entrepreneurship & Family Business Center, IPAG Business School, Paris, France

    Andrea Calabrò

  2. International University of Monaco, Omnes Education, Monaco, Monaco

    Mariateresa Torchia

  3. Excelia Business School, La Rochelle, France

    Andreas Kallmuenzer

  4. Business School - Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

    Hedi Yezza

  5. National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan

    Cheng Feng

Authors
  1. Andrea Calabrò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariateresa Torchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Kallmuenzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hedi Yezza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cheng Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Calabrò.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., Kallmuenzer, A. et al. Transgenerational entrepreneurship in family firms: a configurational approach. Rev Manag Sci 17, 2535–2554 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00592-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00592-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation