Abstract
The roles of subordinates’ trust in supervisors and subordinates’ feeling of being trusted by those supervisors (i.e., felt trust) are equally important for understanding trust relationships. However, subordinates’ felt trust has been less investigated compared with subordinates’ trust in their supervisors. Although the relationships and the mediators between felt trust and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) are being increasingly studied, the moderators of these relationships are rarely investigated. Based on the trust model and on the mechanisms of the effects of felt trust on job performance proposed by previous studies, we select supervisor behavioral integrity, non-work relationship with supervisor, and perceived OCB stress as potential moderators for this study. We found that supervisor behavioral integrity moderates the relationship between felt trust and OCB intention, and that the higher the supervisor behavioral integrity is, the stronger the relationship becomes. Further, we found that perceived OCB stress moderates this relationship, and that the relationship is stronger when perceived OCB stress is lower. Interestingly, perceived OCB stress also moderates the moderating effect of supervisor behavioral integrity, albeit through a different mechanism. Consequently, the moderating effect of supervisor behavioral integrity is stronger when perceived OCB stress is higher. Unexpectedly, employee non-work relationship with supervisor does not moderate the relationship between felt trust and OCB intention. This study fills the knowledge gap on the moderators of felt trust mechanism, and provides new evidence to clarify controversies regarding the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem and felt obligation in the literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adaval R (2003) How good gets better and bad gets worse: understanding the impact of affect on evaluations of known brands. J Consum Res 30:352–367. https://doi.org/10.1086/378614
Anderson NH (1982) Methods of information integration theory. Academic Press, New York
Anderson NH (2013) Unified psychology based on three laws of information integration. Rev Gen Psychol 17:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032921
Andreou E, Alexopoulos EC, Lionis C, Varvogli L, Gnardellis C, Chrousos GP, Darviri C (2011) Perceived stress scale: reliability and validity study in Greece. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:3287–3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8083287
Andrews MC, Kacmar KM, Kacmar C (2015) The interactive effects of behavioral integrity and procedural justice on employee job tension. J Bus Ethics 126:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1951-4
Audi R, Murphy PE (2006) The many faces of integrity. Bus Ethics Q 16:3–21
Baer MD, Dhensa-Kahlon RK, Colquitt JA, Rodell JB, Outlaw R, Long DM (2015) Uneasy lies the head that bears the trust: the effects of feeling trusted on emotional exhaustion. Acad Manag J 58:1637–1657. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0246
Ballinger GA, Rockmann KW (2017) Chutes versus ladders: anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Acad Manag Rev 35:373–391. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok373
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social-cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Bergeron DM (2007) The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: good citizens at what cost? Acad Manag Rev 32:1078–1095. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585791
Blau PM (1964) Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New York
Bolino MC, Turnley WH (2005) The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. J Appl Psychol 90:740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.740
Bolino MC, Hsiung HH, Harvey J, LePine JA (2015) “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. J Appl Psychol 100:56–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037583
Brower HH, Lester SW, Korsgaard MA, Dineen BR (2009) A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. J Manag 35:327–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312511
Bush JT, Welsh DT, Baer MD, Waldman D (2021) Discouraging unethicality versus encouraging ethicality: unraveling the differential effects of prevention- and promotion-focused ethical leadership. Pers Psychol 74:29–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12386
Butler JK Jr (1991) Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. J Manag 17:643–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700307
Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: the role of interpersonal affect in task related ties. Adm Sci Q 53:655–684. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.4.655
Chen YF, Tjosvold D (2006) Participative leadership by American and Chinese managers in China: the role of relationships. J Manag Stud 43:1727–1752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00657.x
Chen X, Zhu Z, Liu J (2021) Does a trusted leader always behave better? the relationship between leader feeling trusted by employees and benevolent and laissez-faire leadership behaviors. J Bus Ethics 170:615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04390-7
Cho J, Schilpzand P, Huang L, Paterson T (2021) How and when humble leadership facilitates employee job performance: the roles of feeling trusted and job autonomy. J Leadersh Organ Stud 28:169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051820979634
Colquitt JA, Scott BA, LePine JA (2007) Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J Appl Psychol 92:909. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
Cook J, Wall T (1980) New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need for non-fulfilment. J Occup Psychol 53:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00005.x
Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manag 31:874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Crossan MM, Byrne A, Seijts GH, Reno M, Monzani L, Gandz J (2017) Toward a framework of leader character in organizations. J Manag Stud 54:986–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12254
Evans SC, Roberts MC, Keeley JW, Blossom JB, Amaro CM, Garcia AM, Reed GM et al (2015) Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. Int J Clin Health Psychol 15:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001
Ferris GR, Liden RC, Munyon TP, Summers JK, Basik KJ, Buckley MR (2009) Relationships at work: toward a multidimensional conceptualization of dyadic work relationships. J Manag 35:1379–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309344741
Finch J (1987) The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 21:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021001008
Gagné M, Deci EL (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav 26:331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gecas V (1982) The self-concept. Ann Rev Sociol 8:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245
Gillespie N (2003) Measuring trust in working relationships: the behavioral trust inventory. In: The annual meeting of the academy of management, Seattle, Washington
Goris JR, Vaught BC, Pettit JD (2003) Effects of trust in superiors and influence of superiors on the association between individual-job congruence and job performance/satisfaction. J Bus Psychol 17:327–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022860224080
Gould D (1996) Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: How valid are the findings? J Clin Nurs 5:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00253.x
Guan X, Frenkel SJ (2018) Explaining supervisor–subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens. Hum Relat 72:1752–1775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718813718
Heimann M, Mullet É, Bonnefon JF (2015) Peoples’ views about the acceptability of executive bonuses and compensation policies. J Bus Ethics 127:661–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2062-6
Hobfoll SE (1989) Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol 44:513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hobfoll SE (2002) Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol 6:307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307
Huang Xu, Van de Vliert E (2003) Where intrinsic job satisfaction fails to work: national moderators of intrinsic motivation. J Organ Behav 24:159–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.186
Hughes R, Huby M (2002) The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Methodol Issues Nurs Res 37:382–386. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.x
Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 93:1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
Kim TY, David EM, Chen T, Liang Y (2022) Authenticity or self-enhancement? effects of self-presentation and authentic leadership on trust and performance. J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211063807
Ko SH, Choi Y, Rhee SY, Moon TW (2018) Social capital and organizational citizenship behavior: double-mediation of emotional regulation and job engagement. Sustainability 10:3600. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103600
Lau DC, Lam LW (2008) Effects of trusting and being trusted on team citizenship behaviors in chain stores. Asian J Soc Psychol 11:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00251.x
Lau DC, Liu J, Fu PP (2007) Feeling trusted by business leaders in China: antecedents and the mediating role of value congruence. Asia Pac J Manag 24:321–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9026-z
Lau DC, Lam LW, Salamon SD (2008) The impact of relational demographics on perceived managerial trustworthiness: Similarity or norms? J Soc Psychol 148:187–209. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.2.187-209
Lau DC, Lam LW, Wen SS (2014) Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: a self-evaluative perspective. J Organ Behav 35:112–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1861
Lau DC, De Jong B, Lam LW (2018) Felt trust at work: a multi-theoretical and multi-referent examination. Acad Manag Proc 2018:13065. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.13065abstract
Laurenceau J-P, Barrett LF, Pietromonaco PR (1998) Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
Law KS, Wong CS, Wang DX, Wang LH (2000) Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: an empirical investigation. Int J Hum Resour Manag 11:751–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190050075105
Legood A, van der Werff L, Lee A, Den Hartog D (2020) A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership-performance relationship. Eur J Work Organ Psy 30:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1819241
Lester SW, Brower HH (2003) In the eyes of the beholder: the relationship between subordinates’ felt trust and their work attitudes and behaviors. J Leadersh Organ Stud 10:17–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190301000203
Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC, Gillespie N (2006) Models of interpersonal trust development: theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. J Manag 32:991–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294405
Lin LH, Ho YL (2010) Guanxi and OCB: the Chinese cases. J Bus Ethics 96:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0465-6
Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2017) Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad Manag J 43:738–748. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556364
Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20:709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
McAllister DJ (2017) Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manag J 38:24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727
Mellor S, Barclay LA, Bulger CA, Kath LM (2006) Augmenting the effect of verbal persuasion on self-efficacy to serve as a steward: gender similarity in a union environment. J Occup Organ Psychol 79:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X36353
Methot JR, Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Christian JS (2016) Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Pers Psychol 69:311–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12109
Organ DW (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books, D. C.
Organ DW (1997) Organizational citizenship behavior: it’s construct clean-up time. Hum Perform 10:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
Oyserman D, Coon H, Kemmelmeier M (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychol Bull 128:3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
Palanski ME, Yammarino FJ (2007) Integrity and leadership: clearing the conceptual confusion. Eur Manag J 25:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.04.006
Pierce JL, Gardner DG (2004) Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: a review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. J Manag 30:591–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, Bachrach DG (2000) Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J Manag 26:513–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00047-7
Poulou M (2001) The role of vignettes in the research of emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emot Behav Diffic 6:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750100507655
Rodell JB, Judge TA (2009) Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? the mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. J Appl Psychol 94:1438–1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016752
Salamon SD, Robinson SL (2008) Trust that binds: the impact of collective felt trust on organizational performance. J Appl Psychol 93:593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750100507655
Schaubroeck J, Lam SS, Peng AC (2011) Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. J Appl Psychol 96:863. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022625
Schoorman FD, Mayer RC, Davis JH (2007) An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future. Acad Manag Rev 32:344–354. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410
Schunk DH (1985) Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychol Sch 22:208–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2%3c208::AID-PITS2310220215%3e3.0.CO;2-7
Shih CT, Lin CCT (2014) From good friends to good soldiers: a psychological contract perspective. Asia Pac J Manag 31:309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9333-5
Simons T (2002) Behavioral integrity: the perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organ Sci 13:18–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9333-5
Simons T, Friedman R, Liu LA, McLean Parks J (2007) Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among Black and non-Black employees. J Appl Psychol 92:650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.650
Simons T, Leroy H, Collewaert V, Masschelein S (2015) How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis of behavioral integrity research. J Bus Ethics 132:831–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2332-3
Skiba T, Wildman JL (2019) Uncertainty reducer, exchange deepener, or self-determination enhancer? feeling trust versus feeling trusted in supervisor-subordinate relationships. J Bus Psychol 34:219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9537-x
Trefalt Š (2013) Between you and me: setting work-nonwork boundaries in the context of workplace relationships. Acad Manag J 56:1802–1829. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0298
Tsai HT, Tsai CL (2022) The influence of the five cardinal values of confucianism on firm performance. RMS 16:429–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00452-1
Ugwu LI, Enwereuzor IK, Orji EU (2016) Is trust in leadership a mediator between transformational leadership and in-role performance among small-scale factory workers? RMS 10:629–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0170-z
Way SA, Simons T, Leroy H, Tuleja EA (2018) What is in it for me? middle manager behavioral integrity and performance. J Bus Ethics 150:765–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3204-9
Wells JD, Hobfoll SE, Lavin J (1999) When it rains, it pours: the greater impact of resource loss compared to gain on psychological distress. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25:1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512010
Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad Manag Rev 14:490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
Williams M (2016) Being trusted: how team generational age diversity promotes and undermines trust in cross-boundary relationships. J Organ Behav 37:346–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2045
Wright TA, Quick JC, Hannah ST, Blake Hargrove M (2017) Best practice recommendations for scale construction in organizational research: the development and initial validation of the Character Strength Inventory (CSI). J Organ Behav 38:615–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2180
Yang JS (2019) Differential moderating effects of collectivistic and power distance orientations on the effectiveness of work motivators. Manag Decis 58:644–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1119
Zhang XA, Li N, Harris TB (2015) Putting non-work ties to work: the case of guanxi in supervisor–subordinate relationships. Leadersh Q 26:37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.008
Zheng X, Hall RJ, Schyns B (2019) Investigating follower felt trust from a social cognitive perspective. Eur J Work Organ Psy 28:873–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1678588
Funding
This research was supported by a grant from Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (Grant Number: MOST 105-2410-H-224 -036 -MY2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by J-SY and L-CT. The first draft of the manuscript was written by J-SY and L-CT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards in Taiwan.
Consent to participate
All authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit.
Consent for publication
All authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, JS., Tsai, LC. The moderating effects of trustor characteristics and the cost of being trusted on the relationship between felt trust and OCB intention. Rev Manag Sci 17, 2417–2441 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00584-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00584-y