Abstract
Collaboration between corporations and sart-ups can dramatically accelerate respective actor’s innovation process. Previous research on this phenomenon has mostly considered the large company’s point of view on sart-up collaboration. There is therefore a research gap related to sart-ups’ objectives, processes and outcomes from corporate collaboration, as well as to the relation between these three categories of variables. The purpose of this study is to identify the critical factors for sart-ups in collaborating with corporations. The paper synthesizes and discusses the findings from 12 qualitative case studies of corporate-sart-up collaboration in Sweden, including different collaboration models and different industrial sectors. It contributes to fill the current knowledge gap in research focused on critical factors for sart-ups in collaborating with large companies for innovation. The study identified three important dimensions: antecedents, outcomes, and collaboration characteristics. For each dimension the main variables and relations among variables are identified. This framework can be useful primarily for sart-ups and could guide them in their decisions related to partnering with large firms. The framework is, however, also useful for other stakeholders involved in corporate-sart-up collaboration initiatives, such as large firms, intermediaries like external accelerators, and the government. This is one of the first studies that explicitly addresses the phenomenon of collaboration between sart-ups and large companies from a sart-up’s point of view. The study is not limited to a specific collaboration model such as for example ‘accelerators’, but includes different models used by large firms. Further, it identifies the factors that could guide sart-ups in analyzing opportunities offered by partnering with larger companies, and therefore could be important parts of their collaboration strategy.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11846-021-00510-8/MediaObjects/11846_2021_510_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggarwal V, Wu A (2018) Inter-organizational collaboration aand start-up innovation. In: Matusik S, Reuer J (eds) Entrepreneurship and collaboration. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Allmendinger MP (2019) Towards asymmetric partnership management: corporate entrepreneurship and open innovation literature. Dissertation, University of Hohenheim
Allmendinger MP, Berger ESC (2020) Selecting corporate firms for collaborative innovation: entrepreneurial decision making in asymmetric partnerships. Int J Inn Man 24(01):1–34
Bagno RB, Salerno MS, de Souza Junior WC, O’Connor GC (2020) Corporate engagements with sart-ups: antecedents, models, and open questions for innovation management. Prod Manag Dev 18(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.4322/pmd.2019.019
Bereczki I (2019) An open innovation ecosystem from a sart-up’s perspective. Int J Innov Manage 23(8):1940001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619400012
Berman A, Cano-Kollmann M, Mudambi R (2021) Innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems: fintech in the financial services industry. Rev Manag Sci Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00435-8
Clark SM, Gioia DA, Ketchen DJ, Thomas JB (2010) Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. Adm Sci Q 55(3):397–438. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.397
Crișan EL, Salanță II, Beleiu IN et al (2021) A systematic literature review on accelerators. J Technol Transfer 46:62–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09754-9
De Groote JK, Backmann J (2020) Initiating open innovation collaborations between incumbents and sart-ups: how can David and Goliath get along? Int J Innov Manage 24(2):2050011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500115
Del Bosco B, Chierici R, Mazzucchelli A (2019) Fostering entrepreneurship: an innovative business model to link innovation and new venture creation. Rev Manage Sci 13(3):561–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0318-8
Eisenhardt K (2021) What is the Eisenhardt method, really? Strateg Organ 19(1):147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866
Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manage J 50(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
Enkel E, Sagmeister V (2020) External corporate venturing modes as new way to develop dynamic capabilities. Technovation 96–97:102–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102128
Eriksson P, Montonen T, Vilhunen J, Voutilainen K (2019) The importance of being known: evaluating companies for growth-oriented incubation. Int J Entrepreneurship Innov Manag 23(5):496–512. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2019.102052
Ferreira JJ, Fernandes CI, Kraus S (2019) Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Rev Manag Sci 13(1):181–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0242-3
Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five Misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12:219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Frow P, Nenonen S, Payne A, Storbacka K (2015) Managing co-creation design: a strategic approach to innovation. Br J Manag 2015:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087
Garidis K, Rossmann A (2019) Toward a framework for cooperation behavior of start-ups: developing a multi-item scale from an empirical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences pp. 5380–5389. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/59974
Gimenez-Fernandez EM, Bogers M, Sandulli F (2019) How the diversity of cooperation partners affects sart-ups’ innovation performance: an analysis of the role of cooperation breadth in open innovation. In: Rexhepi D et al (eds) Open innovation and entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham, pp 9–35
Goncalves D, Bergquist M, Bunk R, Alänge S (2020) Cultural aspects of organizational agility affecting digital innovation. J Entrepreneurship Manag Innov 16(4):13–46
Gutmann T (2019) Harmonizing corporate venturing modes: an integrative review and research agenda. Manag Rev Q 69:121–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-018-0148-4
Gutmann T, Kanbach D, Seltman S (2019) Exploring the benefits of corporate accelerators: investigating the SAP industry 4.0 sart-up program. Probl Perspect Manage 17(3):218–232. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.18
Hausberg JP, Korreck S (2018) Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. J Technol Transf 29(10):657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9651-y
Hochberg YV (2016) Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: the seed accelerator model. Innov Policy Econ 16:25–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/684985
Hogenhuis BN, Van den Hende EA, Hultink EJ (2016) When should large firms collaborate with young ventures? Res Technol Manag 59(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2016.1117329
Hogenhuis BN, Van den Hende EA, Hultink EJ (2017) Unlocking the innovation potential in large firms through timely and meaningful interactions with young ventures. Int J Innov Manag 21(1):1750009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500098
Huang P, Madhavan R (2020) Dumb money or smart money? Meta-analytically unpacking corporate venture capital. Strateg Entrepreneurship J. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1369
Hutter K, Gfrerer A, Lindner B (2020) From popular to profitable: incumbents’ experiences and challenges with external corporate accelerators. Int J Innov Manag. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500353
Kaczam F, Siluk JCM, Guimaraes GE, de Moura GL, da Silva WV, da Veiga CP (2021) Establishment of a typology for sart-ups 4.0. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00463-y
Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Adm Sci Q 53:295–332. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.2.295
Kohler T (2016) Corporate accelerators: building bridges between corporations and sart-ups. Bus Horiz 59(3):347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.008
Kraus S, Roig-Tierno N, Bouncken RB (2019) Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. Rev Manage Sci 13(3):519–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00333-8
Kraus S, Kailer N, Dorfer J, Jones P (2020) Open innovation in (young) SMEs. Int J Entrepreneurship Innov 21(1):47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750319840778
Kurpjuweit S, Wagner SM (2020) Sart-up supplier programs: a new model for managing corporate-sart-up partnerships. Calif Manage Rev 62(3):64–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620914995
Midler C, Silberzahn P (2008) Managing robust development process for high-tech sart-ups through multi-project learning: the case of two european start-ups. Int J Proj Manag 26(5):479–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.003
Minshall T, Mortara L, Valli R, Probert D (2010) Making “asymmetric” partnerships work. Res Technol Manag 53(3):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2010.11657631
Minsky C (2019) VR gloom and other European tech trends. https://sifted.eu/articles/venture-capital-dealroom-data-2018/. Accessed 1 Jan 2019
Morgan H (2014) Venture capital firms and incubators: corporations can work with venture capitalists to leverage the strengths of both worlds. Res Technol Manag 57(6):40–45. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5706014
Moschner SL, Fink AA, Kurpjuweit S, Wagner SM, Herstatt C (2019) Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models. Bus Horiz 62(5):637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.006
Park JH, Bae ZT (2018) When are ‘sharks’ beneficial? Corporate venture capital investment and sart-up innovation performance. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 30(3):324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1310376
Peter L, Back A, Werro T (2018) A taxonomic framework on prevalent collaborative innovation options between corporations and sart-up. Int J Digit Technol Econ 3(2):63–94
Prashantham S, Kumar K (2019) Engaging with sart-ups: MNC perspectives. IIMB Manag Rev 31:407–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.01.003
Pratt MG (2009) For the lack of a boilerplate: tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Acad Manag J 52(5):856–862. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.44632557
Ricciardi F, Zardini A, Czakon W, Rossignoli C, Kraus S (2021) Revisiting the cooperation-competition paradox: a configurational approach to short-and long-term coopetition performance in business networks. Eur Manage J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.002
Riepe J, Uhl K (2020) Sart-ups’ demand for non-financial resources: descriptive evidence from an international corporate venture capitalist. Financ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101321
Rigtering JPC, Behrens MA (2021) The effect of corporate-start-up collaborations on corporate entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00443-2
Rondi E, De Massis A, Kraus S (2021) Servitization through open service innovation in family firms: exploring the ability-willingness paradox. J Bus Res 135:436–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.040
Scott S, Hughes M, Kraus S (2019) Developing relationships in innovation clusters. Entrep Reg Dev 31(1–2):22–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1537145
Silva DS, Ghezzi A, Aguiar RB, Cortimiglia MN, ten Caten CS (2021) Lean sart-up for opportunity exploitation: adoption constraints and strategies in technology new ventures. Int J Entrep Behav Re. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2020-0030
Simon F, Harms R, Schiele H (2019) Managing corporate-sart-up relationships: what matters for entrepreneurs? Int J Entrep Ventur 11(2):164–186. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2019.098770
Srinivasan A, Venkatraman N (2018) Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: a network-centric view. Strateg Entrep J 12(1):54–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1272
Steiber A, Alänge S (2021) Corporate-sart-up collaboration: effects on large firms’ business transformation. Eur J Innov Manage 24(2):235–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0312
Steiber A, Alänge S, Corvello V (2021a) Learning with sart-ups: an empirically grounded typology. Learn Organ 28(2):153–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-04-2020-0061
Steiber A, Alänge S, Corvello V (2021b) Evaluating corporate-sart-up co-creation: a critical review of the literature. Int J Innov Manag. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500730
Strauss AC, Corbin J (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Valkokari K, Seppänen M, Mäntylä J-O (2017) Orchestrating innovation ecosystems: a qualitative analysis of ecosystem positioning strategies. Technol Innov Manag Rev 7(3):12–24
Weiblen T, Chesbrough HW (2015) Engaging with sart-ups to enhance corporate innovation. Calif Manage Rev 57(2):66–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.66
Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organisation: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm Sci Q 36:269–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393356
Yin RK (2014) Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sage, Los Angeles
Funding
This paper is based on research funded by the Swedish Innovation Agency Vinnova’s program “Innovation Management–research for increased innovation capability” (2014–2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Questionnaire–The sart-up’s perspective on collaboration with large companies
Appendix: Questionnaire–The sart-up’s perspective on collaboration with large companies
We are examining the sart-up companies' views on the value of the collaboration with the large companies in open innovation programs. We are interested in the sart-up perspective:
-
1.
Why did you choose to participate [in the innovation collaborative project] and what did you expect to achieve?
-
2.
What goals were set? Were they achieved?
-
3.
How was the collaboration organized?
-
4.
What barriers did you experience in the collaboration?
-
5.
How do you evaluate the experience?
-
6.
How could have the collaboration been improved to create additional value for the sart-up companies?
-
7.
How were assessments and evaluations made at different times—first when assessing project proposals (ex-ante), then during ongoing projects, and finally evaluation after project completion (ex-post)?
-
8.
What is the experience from the collaboration—what has been achieved and how has it been achieved?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corvello, V., Steiber, A. & Alänge, S. Antecedents, processes and outcomes of collaboration between corporates and start-ups. Rev Manag Sci 17, 129–154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00510-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00510-8