Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The moderating effect of innovation on the gender and performance relationship in the outset of the gender revolution

  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

The presence of women on boards of directors has become a social and economic demand. The relation between their presence on the board of directors and improved firm performance has already been studied. This paper aims to shed light on this topic by providing the first test as to how the level of innovation in the company may moderate this relationship. Our results, for a panel data of 231 European listed firms and based on GMM analysis, show that a critical mass of women positively affects firm performance, and that this effect increases as the firm’s innovation activity increases. We situate the analysis in the outset of the gender revolution in the Western countries to understand the nature of the gender equality process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pucheta-Martínez et al. (2018) report that female institutional directors on boards enhance corporate performance, but when they reach a certain threshold on boards (11.72%), firm value decreases. Besides, pressure-resistant female directors on boards also increase firm value, but only up to a certain figure (12.71% on boards), above which they have a negative impact on firm performance. These findings are consistent with an inverted U-shaped relationship between female institutional directors and pressure-resistant female directors and firm performance.

  2. 2.

    On the other hand, Vithessonthi and Racela (2016), on a sample of non-financial companies listed on US stock markets from 1990 to 2013, find that the level of expenditure on R&D is negatively associated with operational performance, and also find a clear negative effect of R&D intensity on ROS (return on sales) for high-intensity R&D firms, but not for firms with low investment in R&D.

  3. 3.

    Although not reported here, we repeated the estimations controlling for the industry effect, and the results do not vary significantly.

References

  1. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1991) R&D, firm size and innovative activity. Innov Technol Change Int Comp 98(2):451–456

  2. Adams RB, Ferreira D (2004) Gender diversity in the boardroom. ECGI, Finance Working Paper 57(2004)

  3. Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94(2):291–309

  4. Adams RB, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter? Manag Sci 58(2):219–235

  5. Adams RB, Mehran H (2012) Bank board structure and performance: evidence for large bank holding companies. J Financ Intermed 21(2):243–267

  6. Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Q J Econ 127(1):137–197

  7. Anderson RC, Reeb DM, Upadhyay A, Zhao W (2011) The economics of director heterogeneity. Financ Manag 40(1):5–38

  8. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

  9. Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29(3):155–173

  10. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

  11. Barney J, Hesterly WS (2008) Administração Estratégica e Vantagem Competitiva. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

  12. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

  13. Bausch A, Krist M (2007) The effect of context-related moderators on the internationalization-performance relationship: evidence from meta-analysis. Manag Int Rev 47(3):319–347

  14. Bear S, Rahamn N, Post C (2010) The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J Bus Ethics 97(2):207–221

  15. Beasley MS (1996) An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Account Rev 71(4):443–465

  16. Beiner S, Drobetz W, Schmid F, Zimmermann H (2004) Is board size an independent corporate governance mechanism? Kyklos 57(3):327–356

  17. Bennedsen M, Kongsted HC, Nielsen KM (2008) The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms. J Bank Financ 32(6):1098–1109

  18. Bhagat S, Bolton B (2008) Corporate governance and firm performance. J Corp Financ 14(3):257–273

  19. Bøhren Ø, Strøm RØ (2010) Governance and politics: regulating independence and diversity in the boardroom. J Bus Finance Account 37(9–10):1281–1308

  20. Bonn I (2004) Board structure and firm performance: evidence from Australia. J Manag Organ 10(1):14–24

  21. Boyd BK (2006) CEO duality and firm performance: a contingency model. Strategic Manag J 16(4):301–312

  22. Bozec R, Dia M (2007) Board structure and firm technical efficiency: evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1734–1750

  23. Brickley JA, Coles JL, Jarrell G (1997) Leadership structure: separating the CEO and chairman of the board. J Corp Finance 3(3):189–220

  24. Burgess Z, Tharenou P (2002) Women board directors: characteristics of the few. J Bus Ethics 37(1):39–49

  25. Cabeza-García L, Fernández-Gago R, Nieto M (2018a) Board gender diversity and director typology impact CSR reporting? Eur Manag Rev 15(4):559–575

  26. Cabeza-García L, Del Brío E, Oscanoa-Victorio M (2018b) Gender factors and inclusive economic growth: the silent revolution. Sustainability 10(1):121

  27. Cabeza-García L, Del Brío E, Rueda C (2019) Legal and cultural factors as catalysts for promoting women in the boardroom. BRQ-Bus Res Q 22:56–67

  28. Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A (2008) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J Bus Ethics 83(3):435–451

  29. Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2003) Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financ Rev 38(1):33–53

  30. Carter DA, D’Souza F, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2010) The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corp Gov 18(5):396–414

  31. Chan L, Lakonishok J, Sougiannis T (2001) The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. J Finance 56(6):2431–2456

  32. Chaney PK, Devinney TM, Winer RS (1991) The impact of new product introductions on the market value of firms. J Bus 64(4):573–610

  33. Chapple L, Humphrey JE (2014) Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. J Bus Ethics 122(4):709–723

  34. Cheng S (2008) Board size and the variability of corporate performance. J Financ Econ 87(1):157–176

  35. Conner KR (1991) A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? J Manag 17(1):121–154

  36. Cruz Milán O, Jimeno Espadas R, Sonda de la Rosa R (2014) Relación del rendimiento de una empresa, con su tamaño, uso de la tecnología y la capacitación: Análisis de las pymes de servicios en un destino turístico. Teoría y Praxis 15:36–58

  37. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs 2:169–187

  38. Dahya J, Dimitrov O, McConnell JJ (2008) Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: a cross-country analysis. J Financ Econ 87(1):73–100

  39. Darmadi S (2011) Board compensation, corporate governance, and firm performance in Indonesia. Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK) https://ssrn.com/abstract=1907103 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1907103

  40. Das A, Kumar V, Kumar U, Haldar R (2009). Impact of R&D expenditure on financial performance: a study of Canadian firms. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference (ASAC) 2009: Niagara Falls, Canadá, 6–9 June 2009

  41. Del Brío E, Del Brío I (2009) Los consejos de administración en las sociedades cotizadas: Avanzando en femenino. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Época 1:102–118

  42. Dobbin F, Jung J (2011) Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: the competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Rev 89(3):809–2228

  43. Duqi A, Torluccio G (2011) Can R&D expenditures affect firm market value? An empirical analysis of a panel of European listed firms. In: Molyneux P (ed) Bank performance, risk and firm financing. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 215–241

  44. Eagly AH (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: a social role interpretation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

  45. Eberhart AC, Maxwell WF, Siddique AR (2004) An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. J Financ 59(2):623–650

  46. Eddy AR, Saunders GB (1980) New product announcements and stock prices. Decis Sci 11(1):90–97

  47. Eliashberg J, Robertson TS (1988) New product preannouncing behavior: a market signaling study. J Mark Res 25(3):282–292

  48. Ellwood S, García-Lacalle J (2015) The influence of presence and position of women on the boards of directors: the case of NHS foundation trusts. J Bus Ethics 130(1):69–84

  49. Erhardt NL, Werbel JD, Shrader CB (2003) Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corp Gov 11(2):102–111

  50. Fama EF (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J Polit Econ 88(2):288–307

  51. Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26(2):301–325

  52. Fernández-Gago R, Cabeza-García L, Nieto M (2016) Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships. Rev Manag Sci 10(1):85–104

  53. Forbes DP, Milliken FJ (1999) Cognition and corporate governance: understanding board of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):489–505

  54. Francoeur C, Labelle R, Sinclair-Desgagné B (2008) Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. J Bus Ethics 81(1):83–95

  55. Franko LG (1989) Global corporate competition: who’s winning, who’s losing and the R&D factor as one reason why. Strategic Manag J 10(5):449–474

  56. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

  57. Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ Sci 24(4):1102–1119

  58. García-Manjón JV, Romero-Merino ME (2012) Research, development, and firm growth Empirical evidence from European top R&D spending firms. Res Policy 41(6):1084–1092

  59. García-Meca E, García-Sánchez I, Martínez-Ferrero J (2015) Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: an international analysis. J Bank Financ 53:202–214

  60. Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: assessment and prospects. Acad Manag Ann 6(1):1–40

  61. Ghasemzadeh P, Nazari JA, Farzaneh M, Mehralian G (2019) Moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance. Learn Organ 26(3):289–303

  62. González VM (2013) Leverage and corporate performance: international evidence. Int Rev Econ Financ 25:169–184

  63. Goodstein J, Gautam K, Boeke W (1994) The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Manag J 15(3):241–250

  64. Goya E, Vayá E, Suriñach J (2016) Innovation spillovers and firm performance: micro evidence from Spain (2004–2009). J Prod Anal 45(1):1–22

  65. Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Acad Manag J 46(6):685–702

  66. Guest PM (2009) The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. Eur J Financ 15(4):385–404

  67. Gul FA, Srinidhi B, Ng AC (2011) Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? J Account Econ 51(3):314–338

  68. Haslam SA, Ryan MK, Kulich C, Trojanowski G, Atkins C (2010) Investing with prejudice: the relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. Br J Manag 21(2):484–497

  69. Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (2003) Boards of directors an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. Econ Policy Rev 9:7–26

  70. Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Johnson RA, Moesel DD (1996) The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Acad Manag J 39(5):1084–1119

  71. Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Johnson RA, Grossman W (2002) Conflicting voices: the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Acad Manag J 45(4):697–716

  72. Hu Y, Izumida S (2008) Ownership concentration and corporate performance: a causal analysis with Japanese panel data. Corp Gov 16(4):342–358

  73. Hutzschenreuter T, Horstkotte J (2013) Performance effects of international expansion processes: the moderating role of top management team experiences. Int Bus Rev 22(1):259–277

  74. Jacobson R (1992) The “Austrian” school of strategy. Acad Manag Rev 17(4):782–807

  75. Jahera JS, Lloyd WP (1992) Additional evidence on the validity of ROI as a measure of business performance. Mid-Atlantic J Bus 28(2):105–112

  76. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

  77. Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) Performance pay and top management incentives. J Polit Econ 98(2):225–264

  78. Jia M, Zhang Z (2013) Critical mass of women on BODs, multiple identities, and corporate philanthropic disaster response: evidence from privately owned Chinese firms. J Bus Ethics 118(2):303–317

  79. Joecks J, Pull K, Vetter K (2013) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: what exactly constitutes a ‘critical mass?’. J Bus Ethics 118(1):61–72

  80. Jurkus AF, Chul PJ, Woodard LS (2011) Women in top management and agency costs. J Bus Res 64(2):180–186

  81. Kapopoulos P, Lazaretou S (2007) Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Greek firms. Corp Gov 15(2):144–158

  82. Kiel GC, Nicholson GJ (2003) Board Composition and corporate performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corp Gov 11(3):189–205

  83. Kleinbaum DB, Kupper LL, Muller KE (1998) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Duxbury Press, Belmont

  84. Koku PS (2010) R&D expenditure and profitability in the pharmaceutical industry in the United States. J Appl Manag Account Res 8(1):35–42

  85. Koku PS, Jagpal HS, Viswanath PV (1997) The effect of new product announcements and preannouncements on stock price. J Mark Focus Manag 2(2):183–199

  86. Konrad A, Kramer V, Erkut S (2008) Critical mass: the impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organ Dyn 37(2):145–164

  87. Kotabe M, Srinivasan SS, Aulakh PS (2002) Multinationality and firm performance: the moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. J Int Bus Stud 33(1):79–97

  88. Kotabe M, Dunlap-Hinkler D, Parente R, Mishra HA (2007) Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. J Int Bus Stud 38(2):259–282

  89. Kramaric TP, Miletic M (2017) Critical mass in the boardroom of Croatian banks. South East Eur J Econ Bus 12(1):22–37

  90. Kramer VW, Konra AM, Erkut S (2006) Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance. Working paper, Wellesley Centers for Women, Wellesley www.ibrarian.net/navon/paper/Critical_Mass_on_Corporate_Boards__Why_Three_or_M.pdf?paperid=11359305. Accessed 15 March 2016

  91. Krasnicka T, Głod W, Wronka-Pospiech M (2018) Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect. Rev Manag Sci 12(3):737–769

  92. Krüger ML (2008) School leadership, sex and gender: welcome to difference. Int J Leadersh Educ 11(2):155–168

  93. Labelle R, Gargouri RM, Francoeur C (2010) Ethics, diversity management, and financial reporting quality. J Bus Ethics 93(2):335–353

  94. Labelle R, Francoeur C, Lakhal F (2015) To regulate or not to regulate? Early evidence on the means used around the world to promote gender diversity in the boardroom. Gend Work Organ 22(4):339–363

  95. Lam TY, Lee SK (2008) CEO duality and firm performance: evidence from Hong Kong. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 8(3):299–316

  96. Li H, Chen P (2018) Board gender diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of firm size. Bus Ethics 27(4):294–308

  97. Lindstaedt H, Wolff M, Fehre K (2011) Frauen in Fuhrungspositionen-Auswirkungen auf den Unternehmenserfolg. German Federal Ministry of Family, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, Berlin

  98. Liu Y, Wei Z, Xie F (2014) Do women directors improve firm performance in China? J Corp Financ 28:169–184

  99. Lome O, Heggeseth AG, Moen Ø (2016) The effect of R&D on performance: do R&D-intensive firms handle a financial crisis better? J High Technol Manag Res 27(1):65–77

  100. Mahadeo JD, Soobaroyen T, Hanuman VO (2012) Board composition and financial performance: uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. J Bus Ethics 105(3):375–388

  101. Maté-García JJ, Rodríguez-Fernández JM (2008) Productivity and R&D: an econometric evidence from Spanish firm-level data. Appl Econ 40(14):1827–1837

  102. Matsa D, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Am Econ J-Appl Econ 5(3):136–169

  103. McDonald ML, Khanna P, Westphal JD (2008) Getting them to think outside the circle: corporate governance, CEOs’ external advice networks, and firm performance. Acad Manag J 51(3):453–475

  104. Miller T, Triana MC (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. J Manag Stud 46(5):755–786

  105. Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev 21(2):402–433

  106. Milliken FJ, Vollrath DA (1991) Strategic decision-making tasks and group effectiveness: insights from theory and research on small group performance. Hum Relat 44(12):1229–1253

  107. Mínguez-Vera A, Martin-Ugedo JF (2010) Firm risk and the power of the chairman and CEO in a civil law country: evidence from Spain. Int J Hum Resour 21(3):371–388

  108. Morbey GK (1988) R&D: its relationship to company performance. J Prod Innovat Manag 5(3):191–200

  109. Murray A (1989) Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Manag J 10:125–142

  110. Nekhili M, Gatfaoui H (2013) Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. J Bus Ethics 118(2):227–249

  111. Neubaum DO, Zahra SA (2006) Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: the moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. J Manag 32(1):108–131

  112. Nguyen T, Locke S, Reddy K (2015) Does boardroom gender diversity matter? Evidence from a transitional economy. Int Rev Econ Financ 37:184–202

  113. Nielsen S, Huse M (2010) The Contribution of women on boards of directors: going beyond the surface. Corp Gov 18(2):136–148

  114. O’Brien JP (2003) The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Manage J 24(5):415–432

  115. O’Connell V, Cramer N (2010) The relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Ireland. Eur Manag J 28(5):387–399

  116. Oliver P, Marwell G, Teixeira R (1985) A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. Am J Sociol 91(3):522–556

  117. O’Regan N, Sims M, Ghobadian A (2008) Does R&D really drive competitive advantage and performance? Int J Manuf Technol Manag 15(3/4):376–403

  118. Pearce JA II, Zahra SA (1992) Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. J Manag Stud 29(4):411–438

  119. Pedersen MT (2013) Girl power in Japanese boardrooms? An exploratory study of critical masses’ impact on firm financial performance. J Int Aff 67(1):259–271

  120. Perryman AA, Fernando GD, Tripathy A (2016) Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. J Bus Res 69(2):579–586

  121. Pindado J, de Queiroz V, de la Torre C (2010) How do firm characteristics influence the relationship between R&D and firm value? Financ Manag 39(2):757–782

  122. Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manag J 58(5):1546–1571

  123. Post C, Rahman N, Rubow E (2011) Green governance: boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Bus Soc 50(1):189–223

  124. Pucheta-Martínez MC, Bel-Oms I, Olcina-Sempere G (2018) Female institutional directors on boards and firm value. J Bus Ethics 152(2):343–363

  125. Ravenscraft DJ, Scherer FM (1987) Mergers, sell-offs, and economic efficiency. The Brookings Institution, Washington

  126. Raymond L, St-Pierre J (2010) R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: an attempt at empirical clarification. Technovation 30(1):48–56

  127. Reese JS, Cool WR (1978) Measuring investment center performance. Harvard Bus Rev 56:28–46

  128. Reguera-Alvarado N, de Fuentes P, Laffarga J (2017) Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. J Bus Ethics 141(2):337–350

  129. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R, Armeli S (2001) Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol 86(5):825–836

  130. Rhode DL, Packel AK (2014) Diversity on corporate boards: how much difference does difference make? Del J Corp Law 39(2):377–426

  131. Richard O (2000) Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: a resource-based view. Acad Manag J 43(2):164–177

  132. Rose C (2007) Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corp Gov 15(2):404–413

  133. Rossi F, Hu C, Foley M (2017) Women in the boardroom and corporate decisions of Italian listed companies: does the “critical mass” matter? Manag Decis 55(7):1578–1595

  134. Rugman AM, Verbeke A (2002) Edith Penrose’s contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management. Strategic Manag J 23(8):769–780

  135. Ruiqi W, Wang F, Xu L, Yuan C (2017) R&D expenditures, ultimate ownership and future performance: evidence from China. J Bus Res 7(1):147–154

  136. Schwizer P, Soana MG, Cucinelli D (2011) The relationship between board diversity and firm performance: The Italian evidence. Paper presented at Congreso de ADEIMF 2011

  137. Selby CC (2000) From male locker room to co-ed boardroom: A twenty-five-year perspective. In: Burke R, Mattis MC (eds) Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 239–251

  138. Seltene M, Brunel O (2008) Brand extension: the moderating role of the category to which the brand extension is found. J Prod Brand Manag 17(6):393–402

  139. Serrasqueiro Z, Nunes PM, Leitão J, Armada M (2010) Are there non-linearities between SME growth and its determinants? A quantile approach. Ind Corp 19(4):1071–1108

  140. Sheinnin DA, Dube L, Schmitt BH (2008) Derivative beliefs and evaluations. J Prod Brand Manag 17(97):453–462

  141. Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1986) Large shareholders and corporate control. J Polit Econ 94(3):461–488

  142. Shleifer A, Vishny R (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52(2):737–783

  143. Shrader C, Blackburn V, Iles P (1997) Women in management and firm financial performance: an exploratory study. J Manag Issues 9(3):355–372

  144. Smith N, Smith V, Verner M (2006) Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. Int J Product Perform Manag 55(7):569–593

  145. Sougiannis T (1994) The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. Account Rev 69(1):44–68

  146. Srinidhi B, Gul FA, Tsui J (2011) Female directors and earnings quality. Contemp Account Res 28(5):1610–1644

  147. Sun S, Anwar S (2015) R&D status and the performance of domestic firms in China’s coal mining industry. Energ Policy 79(1):99–103

  148. Sun J, Liu G, Lan G (2011) Does female directorship on independent audit committees constrain earnings management? J Bus Ethics 99(3):369–382

  149. Tajfel HE (1978) Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press, Oxford

  150. Terjesen S, Sealy R, Singh V (2009) Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corp Gov 17(3):320–337

  151. Toivanen O, Stoneman P, Bosworth D (2002) Innovation and the market value of UK firms, 1989–1995. Oxford B Econ Stat 64(1):39–61

  152. Torchia M, Calabrò A, Huse M (2011) Women directors on corporate boards: from tokenism to critical mass. J Bus Ethics 102(2):299–317

  153. Tsai KH, Wang JC (2008) External technology acquisition and firm performance: a longitudinal study. J Bus Venturing 23(1):91–112

  154. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

  155. Valenti A (2008) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: has it brought about changes in the boards of large US corporations? J Bus Ethics 81(2):401–412

  156. Van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annu Rev Psychol 58:515–541

  157. Vithessonthi C, Racela OC (2016) Short- and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance. J Multinatl Financ Manag 34:28–45

  158. Wang Y, Clift B (2009) Is there a “business case” for board diversity. Pac Account Rev 21(2):88–103

  159. West TV, Heilman ME, Gullett L, Moss-Racusin CA, Magee JC (2012) Building blocks of bias: gender composition predicts male and female group members’ evaluations of each other and the group. J Exp Soc Psychol 48(5):1209–1212

  160. Westphal J, Milton L (2000) How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Admin Sci Quart 45(2):366–401

  161. Wind J, Mahajan V (1997) Issues and opportunities in new product development: an introduction to the special issue. J Mark Res 34(1):1–12

  162. Wintoki MB, Linck JS, Netter JM (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J Financ Econ 105(3):581–606

  163. Yang CH, Chen KH (2009) Are small firms less efficient? Small Bus Econ 32(4):375–395

  164. Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad Manag J 43(5):925–950

  165. Zhang Q, Chen L, Feng T (2014) Mediation or moderation? The role of R&D investment in the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: empirical evidence from the Chinese it industry. Corp Gov 22(6):501–517

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding received from the Projects ECO2015-63880-R & ECO2015-69058-R from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain). This work is also partially supported by the Research Grants SA049G19 (Junta de Castilla y Leon).

Author information

Correspondence to Laura Cabeza-García.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabeza-García, L., Del Brío, E.B. & Rueda, C. The moderating effect of innovation on the gender and performance relationship in the outset of the gender revolution. Rev Manag Sci (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00367-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Board of directors
  • Critical mass of women
  • Performance
  • Innovation

JEL Classification

  • O16
  • M14
  • P17
  • Q55