Abstract
This work aims to elucidate the profile of participants in crowdfunding initiatives among users of collaborative platforms, considering them as agents with a high likelihood of taking part in these initiatives due to being users of digital services. This delimitation is performed by investigating the link between two intrinsic factors (innovativeness and social capital) and participation in crowdfunding initiatives. After the analysis of a sample generated by the Sociological Research Centre (CIS) of 422 users of collaborative platforms, it is found that the two intrinsic factors analyzed are linked with participation in crowdfunding initiatives. Moreover, differentiation in participation among users of collaborative platforms corresponds to the adoption of new services (higher for crowdfunding participants) and bridging social capital (lower for crowdfunding participants). The results obtained suggest incorporation of crowdfunding projects in vertical thematic financial platforms to take advantage of the effect of social capital and innovative capacity to increase participation and maintain diversity of effective financing formulas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlers GK, Cumming D, Günther C, Schweizer D (2015) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract 39(4):955–980
Akgün AE, Keskin H, Kırcovali SY (2018) Organizational wisdom practices and firm product innovation. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0243-2
Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2014) Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd. J Bus Ventur 29(5):585–609
Bi S, Liu Z, Usman K (2017) The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. J Bus Res 71:10–18
Bouncken RB, Reuschl AJ (2018) Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-025-y
Butticè V, Colombo MG, Wright M (2017) Serial crowdfunding, social capital, and project success. Entrep Theory Pract 41(2):183–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12271
Cennamo C, Santaló J (2015) How to avoid platform traps. MIT Sloan Rev 57(1):12–15
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2015) Actitudes y Comportamientos Innovadores en la Sociedad Española. http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/2_bancodatos/estudios/listaEstudiosYear.jsp?year=2015. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2018) Memoria de actividades 2017. http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/-Archivos/Memorias/MEMORIA_CIS_2017.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
Chen Y, Zhang W, Yan X, Jin J (2018) The life-cycle influence mechanism of the determinants of financing performance: an empirical study of a Chinese crowdfunding platform. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0295-y
Cho M, Kim G (2017) A cross-cultural comparative analysis of crowdfunding projects in the United States and South Korea. Comput Hum Behav 72:312–320
Clauss T, Breitenecker RJ, Kraus S, Brem A, Richter C (2017) Directing the wisdom of the crowd: the importance of social interaction among founders and the crowd during crowdfunding campaigns. Econ Innov New Technol 8:1–21
Dapp TF (2017) Fintech: the digital transformation in the financial sector. In: Osburg T, Lohrmann C (eds) Sustainability in a digital world. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–199
Davis BC, Hmieleski KM, Webb JW, Coombs JE (2017) Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: the influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. J Bus Ventur 32(1):90–106
European Commission (2017) Crowdfunding. Reshaping the crowd’s engagement in culture
Evans DS, Schmalensee R (2016) Matchmakers: the new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press, Watertown
Feng Y, Ye HJ, Yu Y, Yang C, Cui T (2018) Gamification artifacts and crowdsourcing participation: examining the mediating role of intrinsic motivations. Comput Hum Behav 81:124–136
Ferreira JJM, Fernandes CI, Kraus S (2018) Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0242-3
García-Villaverde PM, Rodrigo-Alarcón J, Parra-Requena G, Ruiz-Ortega MJ (2018) Technological dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: the heterogeneous effects of social capital. J Bus Res 83:51–64
Gedda D, Nilsson B, Såthén Z, Solberg Søilen K (2016) Crowdfunding: finding the optimal platform for funders and entrepreneurs. Technol Innov Manag Rev 6(3):31–40
Heinze KL, Heinze JE (2018) Individual innovation adoption and the role of organizational culture. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0300-5
Helm R, Landschulze S (2009) Optimal stimulation level theory, exploratory consumer behaviour and product adoption: an analysis of underlying structures across product categories. Rev Manag Sci 3:41–73
Herzberg F (1968) One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harvard Bus Rev 46:53–62
Kang L, Jiang Q, Tan C-H (2016) Remarkable advocates: an investigation of geographic distance and social capital for crowdfunding. Inf Manag 54(3):336–348
Klimas P, Czakon W (2018) Organizational innovativeness and coopetition: a study of video game developers. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0269-5
Kraus S, Meier F, Niemand T (2016a) Experimental methods in entrepreneurship research: the status quo. Int J Entrep Behav Res 22(6):958–983
Kraus S, Richter C, Brem A, Cheng CF, Chang ML (2016b) Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. J Innov Knowl 1(1):13–23
Liang H, Wang M-M, Wang J-J, Xue Y (2018) How intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives affect task effort in crowdsourcing contests: a mediated moderation model. Comput Hum Behav 81:168–176
Martínez-Román JA, Romero I (2017) Determinants of innovativeness in SMEs: disentangling core innovation and technology adoption capabilities. Rev Manag Sci 11:543–596
McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategies, emergent views and next steps. Strateg Manag J 38(1):141–160
Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 29(1):1–16
Niemand T, Angerer M, Thies F, Kraus S, Hebenstreit R (2018) Equity crowdfunding across borders: a conjoint experiment. Int J Entrep Behav Res 24(4):911–932
Nucciarelli A, Li F, Fernandes KJ, Goumagias N, Cabras I, Devlin S, Kudenko D, Cowling P (2017) From value chains to technological platforms: the effects of crowdfunding in the digital game industry. J Bus Res 78:341–352
Ordanini A, Miceli L, Pizzetti M, Parasuraman A (2011) Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. J Serv Manag 22(4):443–470
Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy—and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company, New York
Qin Z, Deng X (2016) Government and family Guanxi in Chinese private firms: perceptions and preference. Rev Manag Sci 10(1):35–60
Rey-Moreno M, Medina-Molina C (2016) Social capital in E-services adoption. Psychol Mark 33(12):1151–1158
Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029
Rogers E (1995) Diffusion of innovation. Free, New York
Roig-Tierno N, Kraus S, Cruz S (2018) The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci 12(2):379–383
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78
Shibchurn J, Yan X (2015) Information disclosure on social networking sites: an intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Comput Hum Behav 44:103–117
Skirnevskiy V, Bendig D, Brettel M (2017) The influence of internal social capital on serial creators’ success in crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract 41(2):209–236
Taüscher K (2018) When is business model innovation an effective platform strategy? Academy of management annual meeting
Thies F, Huber A, Bock C, Benlian A, Kraus S (2018) Following the crowd—does crowdfunding affect venture capitalists’ selection of entrepreneurial ventures? J Small Bus Manag. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12447) (in print)
Turi AN, Domingo-Ferrer J, Sánchez D, Osmani D (2017) A co-utility approach to the mesh economy: the crowd-based business model. Rev Manag Sci 11:411–442
Vilnai-Yavetz I, Levina O (2018) Motivating social sharing of e-business content: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, or crowding-out effect? Comput Hum Behav 79:181–191
Zhang Y, Sun Y, Kim Y (2017) The influence of individual differences on consumer’s selection of online sources for health information. Comput Hum Behav 67:303–312
Zhao Y, Zhu Q (2014) Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: current status and future direction. Inf Syst Front 16(3):417–434
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Medina-Molina, C., Rey-Moreno, M., Felício, J.A. et al. Participation in crowdfunding among users of collaborative platforms: the role of innovativeness and social capital. Rev Manag Sci 13, 529–543 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00329-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00329-4