Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Indebtedness in family-managed firms: the moderating role of female directors on the board

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the analysis of capital structure has motivated a huge amount of literature within the field of finance, much is still unrevealed regarding how and why managers decide to get into debt. Stimulated by the increasing interest in capital structure decisions of family businesses and by the growing demand for advocating a faster increase in the presence of female directors in boardrooms, our work addresses how family management and the presence of a female critical mass affect the firm indebtedness in a private firm context. This study uses a sample of 4223 private firms in Spain, a privileged context to test the objectives of this work, from 2006 to 2013. We find that family-managed firms rely more heavily on indebtedness than non-family managed firms. The results also suggest that the presence of female directors has a negative influence on indebtedness. Finally, our findings also show that the involvement of female directors moderates the family management-indebtedness relationship, in such that only when a critical mass of women directors is on the board, the positive effect of family management on firm indebtedness is diminished considerably. Practitioners should consider family management and female presence on the board as essential factors when establishing financing strategy. Likewise, government agencies should take into consideration both aspects when designing and setting policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94:291–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams R, Ferreira D (2010) Moderation in groups: evidence from betting on ice break-ups in Alaska. Rev Econ Stud 77:882–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew J, Balduzzi P, Sundén A (2003) Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan. Am Econ Rev 93:193–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Knoeber R (1996) Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. J Financ Quant Anal 13(3):377–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahern K, Dittmar A (2012) The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Q J Econ 127:137–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampenberger M, Schmid T, Achleitner A, Kaserer C (2013) Capital structure decisions in family firms: empirical evidence from a bank-based economy. Rev Manag Sci 7(3):247–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson G, Raissi M (2018) Corporate indebtedness and low productivity growth of Italian firms. Working paper International Monetary Fund (IMF), WP/18/33

  • Anderson RC, Reeb DM (2003) Founding-family ownership and FP: evidence from the S&P 500. J Financ 58:1301–1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Duru A, Reeb DM (2009) Founders, heirs, and corporate opacity in the United States. J Financ Econ 92(2):205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Reeb DM, Upadhyay A, Zhao W (2011) The economics of director heterogeneity. Financ Manag 40:5–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang JS, Cole RA, Lin JW (2000) Agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ 55(1):81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregle JL, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG, Very P (2007) The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. J Manag Stud 44(1):73–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrachan JH, Shanker MC (2003) Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: a closer look. Fam Bus Rev 16(3):211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Babajide Wintoki M, Linck JS, Netter JM (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J Financ Econ 105:581–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek HY, Cho DD, Fazio PL (2016) Family ownership, control and corporate capital structure. An examination of small capitalization public firms. J Fam Manag 6(2):169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Baixauli JS, Belda-Ruiz M, Sánchez-Marín G (2016) An executive hierarchy analysis of stock options: does gender matter? Rev Manag Sci 11:737–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0202-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baños-Caballero S, García-Teruel PJ, Martínez-Solano P (2012) How does working capital management affect the profitability of Spanish SMEs? Small Bus Econ 39:517–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett F, Barnett S (1988) Working together: entrepreneurial couples. Ten Speed Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky RB, Juster FT, Kimball MS, Shapiro MD (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Q J Econ 112:537–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten J, Hettihewa S (1999) Small firm behaviour in Sri Lanka. Small Bus Econ 13:201–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasek A, Shwiff S (2001) Gender, risk, and retirement. J Econ Issues 2:345–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrone P, Cruz C, Gomez-Mejia LR, Kintana ML (2010) Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less? Admin Sci Q 55(1):82–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrone P, Cruz C, Gomez-Mejia LR (2012) Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Fam Bus Rev 25:258–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria D (2006) The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. J Manag Issues XVIII 1:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Mazagatos V, de Quevedo-Puente E, Castrillo LA (2007) The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: an exploratory study. Fam Bus Rev 20(3):199–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth L, Aivazian V, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2001) Capital structures in developing countries. J Finance 56(1):87–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brav O (2009) Access to capital, capital structure, and the funding of the firm. J Finance 64:263–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgstaller J, Wagner E (2015) How do family ownership and founder management affect capital structure decisions and adjustment of SMEs? Evidence from a bank-based economy. J Risk Finance 16(1):73–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD (1999) Gender differences in risk-taking: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 125(3):367–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Suárez MK, Déniz-Déniz MC, Martín-Santana JD (2014) The setting of non-financial goals in the family firm: the influence of family climate and identification. J Fam Bus Strateg 5:289–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics. methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2010) Microeconometrics using Stata. Revised edition. Stata Press, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A (2008) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J Bus Ethics 83(3):435–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney M, Van Essen M, Gedajlovic ER, Heugens P (2013) What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrep Theory Pract 39(3):513–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter S, Shaw E (2006) Women´s business ownership: recent research and policy developments. DTI Small Business Service Research Report, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter DA, D’Souza F, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2010) The gender and ethnic diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and firm financial performance. Corp Gov 18(5):396–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson M (1999) The economics of the family firm. Scan Econ Hist Rev 47(1):10–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Ni X, Tong JY (2016) Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: a case of R&D investment. J Bus Ethics 136:599–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Litz RA (2004) Comparing the agency cost of family and non-family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 24(8):335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Kellermanns FW, Chang EPC (2007a) Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. J Bus Res 60(10):1030–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman JJ, Sharma P, Taggar S (2007b) Family influences on firms: an introduction. J Bus Res 60(10):1005–1011

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Steier LP, Rau SB (2012) Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: an introduction. Entrep Theory Pract 36(6):1103–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly BL, Haynes KT, Tihanyi L, Gamache DL, Devers CE (2013) Minding the gap: antecedents and consequences of top management-to-worker pay dispersion. J Manag 20(10):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinidis C, Cornet A, Asandei S (2006) Financing of women-owned ventures: the impact of gender and other owner- and firm-related variables. Venture Cap 8:133–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa PT Jr, Terracciano A, McCrae RR (2001) Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:322–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Credit Suisse Research Institute (Credit Suisse) (2012) Gender diversity and corporate performance, Switzerland

  • Croci E, Doukas JA, Gonenc H (2011) Family control and financing decisions. Euro Financ Manag 17(5):860–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming DJ, Leung TY, Rui OM (2012) Gender diversity and security fraud. Working paper, Schulich School of Business, York University

  • Deloitte (2017) Women in the boardroom. A global perspective, 5th edn. Global Center for Corporate Governance, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H, Lehn K (1985) The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. J Polit Econ 93:1155–1177

    Google Scholar 

  • Diéguez-Soto J, López-Delgado P, Rojo-Ramírez A (2015) Identifying and classifying family businesses. Rev Manag Sci 9(3):603–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0128-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkmans C, Kerkhof P, Beukeboom CJ (2015) A stage to engage: social media use and corporate reputation. Tour Manag 47:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan AM, Krone SP, LeCouvie K, Pendergast JM, Kenyon-Rouvinez DH, Schuman AM (2008) A woman’s place: the crucial roles of women in family business. Family Business Consulting Group, Marietta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2002) Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evol Hum Behav 23:281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel CC, Grossmann PJ (2008) Men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence. In: Plott CR, Smith VL (eds) Handbook of experimental economics results, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1061–1073. Agency theory: an assessment and a review. Acad Manag Rev 14(2):57–74

  • Egon Zehnder (2016) Global Board Diversity Analysis. www.egonzehnder.com/GBDA

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011a) Communication from the Commission to the Council, to the European Parliament, to the Committee of the Regions, and to the European and Social Committee. An Action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0870

  • European Commission (2011b) EU Justice Commissioner Reding challenges business leaders to increase women’s presence on corporate boards with “Women on the Board Pledge for Europe”. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-124_en.htm?locale=en

  • Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26:301–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell KA, Hersch PL (2005) Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. J Corp Financ 11:85–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis B, Hasan I, Park JC, Wu Q (2010) Gender differences in financial reporting decision-making: evidence from accounting conservatism. Unpublished working paper. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY

  • Francis B, Hasan I, Wu Q (2013) The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting. J Account Audit Finance 28:53–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur C, Labelle R, Sinclair-Desgagné B (2008) Gender diversity in corporate governance and topmanagement. J Bus Ethics 81:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank MZ, Goyal VK (2009) Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important? Financ Manag 38(1):1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo M, Vilaseca A (1996) Finance in family business. Fam Bus Rev 9(4):287–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo MA, Tapies J, Cappuyns K (2004) Comparison of family and nonfamily business: financial logic and personal preferences. Fam Bus Rev 17(4):303–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia LR, Haynes KT, Nunez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJL, Moyano-Fuentes J (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin Sci Q 52:106–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia LR, Cruz C, Berrone P, De Castro J (2011) The bind that ties: socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Acad Manag Ann 5:653–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomis R, Khatiwada S (2016) Debt and productivity: evidence from firm level data. Working paper International Labour Office (ILO), 15

  • González M, Guzmán A, Pombo C, Trujillo MA (2013) Family firms and debt: risk aversion versus risk of losing control. J Bus Res 66(11):2308–2320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham J (1996) Debt and the marginal tax rate. J Financ Econ 41:41–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul FA, Srinidhi B, Tsui JSL (2008) Board diversity and the demand for higher audit effort. Working paper. http://ssrn.com/paper=1359450S

  • Harris CK (2014) Women directors on public company boards: does a critical mass affect leverage? Business and Economics Faculty Publications. Paper 29. http://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/bus_econ_fac/29

  • Harris M, Raviv A (1988) Corporate control contests and capital structure. J Financ Econ 20:55–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris M, Raviv A (1990) Capital structure and the informational role of debt. J Financ 45(2):321–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck J, Suess-Reyesm J, Beck S, Prügl R, Hermann F (2016) Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: a validation and short form of the FIBER Scale. J Fam Bus Strategic 7(3):133–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2012) PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. http://www.personal.psu.edu/jxb14/M554/articles/process2012.pdf

  • Hayes AF (2013) An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechavarria DM, Ingram A, Justo R, Terjesen S (2012) Are women more likely to pursue social and environmental entrepreneurship. In: Hughes KD, Jennings JE (eds) Global women’s entrepreneurship research: diverse settings, questions and approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 135–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Cánovas G, Martínez-Solano P (2007) Effect of the number of banking relationships on credit availability: evidence from panel data of spanish small firms. Small Bus Econ 28:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-6704-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Nicolás CM, Martín-Ugedo JF, Mínguez-Vera A (2016) La influencia del género en la dirección de las sociedades cooperativas españolas sobre la rentabilidad y el endeudamiento: Un análisis empírico. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos 122:135–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman AJ, Shropshire C, Canella AA (2007) Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Acad Manag J 50(4):941–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Kisgen DJ (2010) Gender and corporate finance. Unpublished working paper. Boston College, Boston, MA

  • Huang J, Kisgen DJ (2013) Gender and corporate finance: are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? J Financ Econ 108:822–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts J, Voordeckers W, Lybaert N (2012) Entrepreneurial risk taking of private family firms: the influence of a nonfamily CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Fam Bus Rev 26(2):161–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Informa (2017) Presencia de las mujeres en la empresa española. https://cdn.informa.es/sites/5809ccf0cdaeee62837a6c07/assets/58be72d596d1f813097ddd46/mujeres_consejos_2017_v2.pdf

  • Instituto de la empresa Familiar (2015) La Empresa Familiar En España. http://www.iefamiliar.com/upload/documentos/la-empresa-familiar-en-espana-2015.pdf

  • Iqbal A, Hameed I, Ramzan N (2012) The impact of debt capacity on firm’s growth. Am J Sci Res 59:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe DT (2005) Strategic planning for the family in the business. J Financ Plan 18(3):50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain BA, Shao Y (2015) Family firm governance and financial policy choices in newly public firms. Corp Gov Intern Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings JE, Brush CG (2013) Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Acad Manag Ann 7:663–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76:323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Jianakoplos NA, Bernasek A (1998) Are women more risk averse? Econ Inq 36:620–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkus AF, Park JC, Woodard LS (2011) Women in top management and agency costs. J Bus Res 64(2):180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Keasey K, Martinez B, Pindado J (2015) Young family firms: financing decisions and the willingness to dilute control. J Corp Finance 34:47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Gao FY (2013) Does family involvement increase business performance? Family-longevity goals’ moderating role in Chinese family firms. J Bus Res 66:265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • King MR, Santor E (2008) Family values: ownership structure, performance and capital structure of Canadian firms. J Bank Finance 32:2423–2432

    Google Scholar 

  • Koropp C, Grichnik D, Kellermanns F (2013) Financial attitudes in family firms: the moderating role of family commitment. J Small Bus Manag 51(1):114–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00380.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad A, Kramer V, Erkut S (2008) Critical mass: the impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organ Dyn 37(2):145–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Korajczyk RA, Levy A (2003) Capital structure choice: macroeconomic conditions and financial constraints. J Finance Econ 68:75–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlar J, Fang H, De Massis A, Frattini F (2014) Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and non-family firms. J Prod Innov Manag 31(6):1128–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalewski O, Talavera O, Stetsyuk I (2010) Influence of founding-family ownership and managerial regime on firm performance: evidence from companies on WSE. Fam Bus Rev 23(1):45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer V, Konrad A, Erkut S (2006) Critical mass on corporate boards: why three or more women enhance governance. Wellesley Centers for Women, Report No. WCW 11. Wellesley Centers for Women, Wellesley, MA

  • Kristie J (2011) The power of three. Dir. Boards 35(5):22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi MD, Li K, Zhang F (2013) Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. J Corp Fin 28:185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wei Z, Xie F (2014) Do women directors improve firm performance in China? J Corp Fin 28:169–184

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Delgado P, Diéguez-Soto J (2015) Lone founders, types of private family businesses and firm performance. J Fam Bus Strateg 6(2):73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Gracia J, Sánchez-Andújar S (2007) Financial structure of the family business: evidence from a group of small Spanish firms. Fam Bus Rev 20(4):269–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Low DCM, Roberts H, Whiting RH (2015) Board gender diversity and firm performance: empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pac Basin Finance J 35:381–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Ugedo JF, Miguez-Vera A (2014) Firm performance and women on the board: evidence from Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Fem Econ 20(3):136–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Am Econ J Appl Econ 5:136–169

    Google Scholar 

  • McConaughy DL, Matthews CH, Fialko AS (2001) Founding family controlled firms: performance, risk, and value. J Small Bus Manag 39:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Michiels A, Molly V (2017) Financing decisions in family businesses: a review and suggestions for developing the field. Fam Bus Rev 30(4):369–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Mika A, Zumer T (2017) Indebtedness in the EU: a drag or a catalyst for growth? Working paper European Central Bank (ECB), 2118

  • Miller T, Del Carmen Triana M (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. J Manag Stud 46:755–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller CC, Burker LM, Glick WH (1998) Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: implications for strategic decision processes. Strateg Manag J 19:39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Mínguez-Vera A, Martin A (2011) Gender and management on Spanish SMEs: an empirical analysis. Int J Hum Resour Manag 22(14):2852–2873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.599948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra CS, McConaughy DL (1999) Founding family control and capital structure: the risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Molly V, Laveren E, Deloof M (2010) Family business succession and its impact on financial structure and performance. Fam Bus Rev 23(2):131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Namazi M, Namazi N-R (2016) Conceptual analysis of moderator and mediator variables in business research. Procedia Econ Finance 36:540–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekhili M, Gatfaoui H (2013) Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French Boards of Directors. J Bus Ethics 118:227–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen RY, Cox C (2001) The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: The case of professional investors. J Psychol Financ Mark 2(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters B, Westerheide P (2009) Short-term borrowing for long-term projects: are family business more susceptible to ‘Irrational’ financing choices? http://ssrn.com/abstract=1342314

  • Poza EJ, Messer T (2001) Spousal leadership and continuity in the family firm. Fam Bus Rev 14(1):25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan RG, Zingales L (1995) What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence frominternational data. J Finance 50(5):1421–1460

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramly Z, Chan S-G, Mustapha M-Z, Sapiei N-S (2017) Women on boards and bank efficiency in ASEAN-5: the moderating role of the independent directors. Rev Manag Sci 11(1):225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0186-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J 9(1):86–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok W, Peck S, Tacheva S (2007) Nationality and gender diversity on swiss corporate boards. Corp Gov 15(4):546–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid T (2013) Control considerations, creditor monitoring, and the capital structure of family firms. J Bank Financ 37(2):257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze WS, Kellermanns FW (2015) Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrep Theory Pract 39:447–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN (2003) Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. J Bus Ventur 18(4):473–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrasqueiro Z, Nunes PM, Da Silva JV (2012) Are financing decisions of family-owned SMEs different? Empirical evidence using panel data. J Manag Organ 18(3):363–382. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2012.18.3.363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan A, Milgate G (2005) Accessing board positions: a comparison of female and male board members’ views. Corp Gov 13:847–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CJ, Warner JB (1979) On financial contracting: an analysis of bond covenants. J Financ Econ 7(2):117–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith N, Smith V, Verner M (2006) Do women in topmanagement affect firmperformance? A panel study of 2,500 danish firms. Int J Prod Perform Manage 55(7):569–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz RM (1988) Managerial control of voting rights: financing policies and the market for corporate control. J Financ Econ 20:25–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz RM (1990) Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. J Financ Econ 26:3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman S, Wessels R (1988) The determinants of capital structure choice. J Finance 43:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerkhof P, Steijvers T, Hendriks W, Voordeckers W (2015) The effect of organizational characteristics on the appointment of nonfamily managers in private family firms: the moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Fam Bus Rev 28(2):104–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513514274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga B, Amit R (2006) How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? J Financ Econ 80:385–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson N, Altanlar A (2009) Director characteristics, gender balance and insolvency risk: an empirical study. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1932107 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1932107

  • World Bank Report (2012) Washington: World Bank. http://www.bancomundial.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/PLBSummer12latest.pdf

  • Yi A (2011) Mind the gap: half of Asia’s boards have no women, a risky position for governance and growth. The Korn/Ferry Institute, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Statistics and Econometrics Department, El Ejido s/n, 29071, Málaga, Spain

    P. López-Delgado

  2. Finances and Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Málaga, El Ejido s/n, 29071, Málaga, Spain

    J. Diéguez-Soto

Authors
  1. P. López-Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Diéguez-Soto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Diéguez-Soto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Delgado, P., Diéguez-Soto, J. Indebtedness in family-managed firms: the moderating role of female directors on the board. Rev Manag Sci 14, 727–762 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0307-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0307-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation