Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 377–396 | Cite as

Assessing decision quality and team performance: perspectives of knowledge internalization and resource adequacy

  • Chieh-Peng Lin
  • Kuang-Jung Chen
  • Chu-Mei Liu
  • Chiu-Hui LiaoEmail author
Original Paper
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

Drawing upon resource-based view and social cognitive theory, this work develops a model that validates the formation of team decision quality and team performance. The model is empirically tested with data obtained from IT professionals across MIS work teams from Taiwan’s banking and insurance industry. The statistical results reveal that team performance is indirectly related to collective efficacy and participatory sense making via the full mediation of team decision quality, while collective efficacy and participatory sense making are directly related to knowledge internalization and resource adequacy. At the same time, the effect of participatory sense making on collective decision quality is negatively moderated by team hypercompetition. Finally, managerial implications and limitations based on the empirical findings are provided.

Keywords

Knowledge internalization Participatory sense making Decision quality Survey research 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90B70 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

References

  1. Achrol RS, Stern LW (1988) Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. J Mark Res 25(1):36–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amason AC (1996) Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. Acad Manag J 39(1):123–148Google Scholar
  3. Appelbaum SH, Hare A (1996) Self-efficacy as a mediator of goal setting and performance: some human resource applications. J Manag Psychol 11(3):33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura A (1995) Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baruch Y, Lin CP (2012) All for one, one for all: coopetition and virtual team performance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(6):1155–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beersma B, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Moon H, Conlon DE, Ilgen DR (2003) Cooperation, competition, and team performance: toward a contingency approach. Acad Manag J 46(5):572–590Google Scholar
  8. Belso-Martínez JA, Molina-Morales FX, Mas-Verdu F (2011) Clustering and internal resources: moderation and mediation effects. J Knowl Manage 15(5):738–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry GR (2006) Can computer-mediated asynchronous communication improve team processes and decision making? Learning from the management literature. J Bus Commun 43(4):344–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhatt GD (2000) Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. J Knowl Manage 4(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke CS, Stagl KC, Salas E, Pierce L, Kendall DL (2006) Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. J Appl Psychol 91(6):1189–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnstein E, Vinokur A (1977) Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. J Exp Soc Psychol 13(4):315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang SJ, Van Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 41(2):178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen J, Wei S (2008) University–industry collaboration, knowledge management and enterprise innovation performance: an empirical study. Ind High Educ 22(5):275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen C-Y, Huang H-H, Wey S-C (2017) The mediating roles of differentiation strategy and learning orientation in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Corp Manag Rev 37(1):1–40Google Scholar
  16. Choo AS, Linderman KW, Schroeder RG (2007) Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management. J Oper Manage 25(4):918–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chung HM (2006) Managerial ties, control and deregulation: an investigation of business groups entering the deregulated banking industry in Taiwan. Asia Pac J Manage 23(4):505–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dirks KT (2000) Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. J Appl Psychol 85(6):1004–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dooley RS, Fryxell GE (1999) Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: the moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Acad Manag J 42(4):389–402Google Scholar
  20. Durmuşoğlu SS, Barczak G (2011) The use of information technology tools in new product development phases: analysis of effects on new product innovativeness, quality, and market performance. Ind Mark Manage 40(2):321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Field RG (1979) A critique of the Vroom–Yetton contingency model of leadership behavior. Acad Manag Rev 4(2):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frazier P, Tix AP, Barron KE (2004) Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 51(1):115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibbons DE, Weingart LR (2001) Can I do it? Will I try? Personal efficacy, assigned goals, and performance norms as motivators of individual performance. J Appl Soc Psychol 31(3):624–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glick WH (1985) Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad Manag Rev 10(3):601–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldberg M, Pasher E, Levin-Sagi M (2006) Citizen participation in decision-making processes: knowledge sharing in knowledge cities. J Knowl Manage 10(5):92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grant AM, Pollock TG (2011) Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: setting the hook. Acad Manag J 54(5):873–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. He H, Baruch Y, Lin CP (2014) Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: the role of within-team competition. Hum Relat 67(8):947–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA (1997) The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychol Bull 121(1):43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Intezari A, Intezari A, Gressel S, Gressel S (2017) Information and reformation in KM systems: big data and strategic decision-making. J Knowl Manage 21(1):71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James LR (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J Appl Psychol 67(2):219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones GR (1983) Psychological orientation and the process of organizational socialization: an interactionist perspective. Acad Manag Rev 8(3):464–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalpic B, Bernus P (2006) Business process modeling through the knowledge management perspective. J Knowl Manage 10(3):40–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karakowsky L, Miller D (2002) Teams that listen and teams that do not: exploring the role of gender in group responsiveness to negative feeback. Team Perform Manag An Int J 8(7/8):146–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Bolger N (1998) Data analysis in social psychology. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds) The handbook of social psychology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 233–265Google Scholar
  35. Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Ann Rev Psychol 55:623–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim M, Shin Y (2015) Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity. Asia Pac J Manage 32(3):693–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kono T (2014) Extended mind and after: socially extended mind and actor–network. Integr Psychol Behav Sci 48(1):48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Korsgaard MA, Schweiger DM, Sapienza HJ (1995) Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: the role of procedural justice. Acad Manag J 38(1):60–84Google Scholar
  39. Kurtz CF, Snowden DJ (2003) The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst J 42(3):462–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lau HC, Ning A, Pun KF, Chin KS, Ip WH (2005) A knowledge-based system to support procurement decision. J Knowl Manage 9(1):87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee KC, Lee S, Kang IW (2005) KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance. Inf Manage 42(3):469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lim BC, Klein KJ (2006) Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J Organ Behav 27(4):403–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lin CP, Baruch Y, Shih WC (2012) Corporate social responsibility and team performance: the mediating role of team efficacy and team self-esteem. J Bus Ethics 108(2):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin CP, Joe SW, Chen S-C, Wang H-J (2015) Better to be flexible than to have flunked: the mediating role of service flexibility and its determinants for team performance. J Serv Manage 26(5):823–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu M-L, Liu NT, Ding CG, Lin CP (2015) Exploring team performance in high-tech industries: future trends of building up teamwork. Technol Forecast Soc Change 91:295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Louis MR (1980) Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Adm Sci Q 25(2):226–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luan C-J, Tien C (2017) Where is foreign institutional investors’ efficacy? A transparency & disclosure perspective. Corp Manag Rev 37(1):41–75Google Scholar
  48. Man DC, Lam SSK (2003) The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: a cross-cultural analysis. J Organ Behav 24(8):979–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCauley-Smith C, Williams SJ, Gillon AC, Braganza A (2015) Making sense of leadership development: developing a community of education leaders. Stud High Educ 40(2):311–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McKenzie J, van Winkelen C, Grewal S (2011) Developing organisational decision-making capability: a knowledge manager’s guide. J Knowl Manage 15(3):403–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyskens MA (2010). How do partnerships lead to a competitive advantage? Applying the resource based view to Nascent Social Ventures. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 238. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/238
  52. Mohamed M, Stankosky M, Mohamed M (2009) An empirical assessment of knowledge management criticality for sustainable development. J Knowl Manage 13(5):271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morgeson FP (2005) The external leadership of self-managing teams: intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. J Appl Psychol 90(3):497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Newbert SL (2008) Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 29(7):745–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Postmes T, Spears R, Cihangir S (2001) Quality of decision making and group norms. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(6):918–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Richard OC (2000) Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: a resource-based view. Acad Manag J 43(2):164–177Google Scholar
  58. Rousseau D (1985) Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In: Cummings LL, Staw B (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  59. Rousseau V, Aubé C (2010) Social support at work and affective commitment to the organization: the moderating effect of job resource adequacy and ambient conditions. J Soc Psychol 150(4):321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruscher JB, Fiske ST (1990) Interpersonal competition can cause individuating processes. J Pers Soc Psychol 58(5):832–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruscher JB, Fiske ST, Mikl H, Van Manen S (1991) Individuating processes in competition: interpersonal versus intergroup. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 17(6):595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryckman RM, Hammer M, Kaczor LM, Gold JA (1996) Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale. J Pers Assess 66(2):374–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salamon SD, Robinson SL (2008) Trust that binds: the impact of collective felt trust on organizational performance. J Appl Psychol 93(3):593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Salanova M, Rodríguez-Sánchez AM, Schaufeli WB, Cifre E (2014) Flowing together: a longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups. J Psychol 148(4):435–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Nicholson D, Howse WR (2007) Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: the power of team performance diagnosis. Aviat Space Environ Med 78(Supplement 1):B77–B85Google Scholar
  66. Selen W (2000) Knowledge management in resource-based competitive environments: a roadmap for building learning organizations. J Knowl Manage 4(4):346–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Skrabski Á, Kopp M, Kawachi I (2004) Social capital and collective efficacy in Hungary: cross sectional associations with middle aged female and male mortality rates. J Epidemiol Community Health 58(4):340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smart C, Vertinsky I (1977) Designs for crisis decision units. Adm Sci Q 22(4):640–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sniezek JA (1992) Groups under uncertainty: an examination of confidence in group decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 52(1):124–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spector PE, Brannick MT (1995) The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research. In: Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds) International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 249–274Google Scholar
  71. Stagl KC, Burke CS, Salas E, Pierce L (2006) Team adaptation: realizing team synergy. In: Burke CS, Pierce LG, Salas E (eds) Understanding adaptability: a prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Starbuck W, Milliken F (1988) Executives perceptual filters: what they notice and how they make sense. In: Hambrick D (ed) The executive effect: concepts and methods for studying top managers. JAI, Greenwich, pp 35–65Google Scholar
  73. Sundstrom E, Busby PL, Bobrow WS (1997) Group process and performance: interpersonal behaviors and decision quality in group problem solving by consensus. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 1(3):241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tai Y-H (2017) Earnings management in family firms: the role of inside directors. Corp Manag Rev 37(1):77–114Google Scholar
  75. Tian J, Nakamori Y, Wierzbicki AP (2009) Knowledge management and knowledge creation in academia: a study based on surveys in a Japanese research university. J Knowl Manage 13(2):76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tjosvold D, Poon M, Yu ZY (2005) Team effectiveness in China: cooperative conflict for relationship building. Hum Relat 58(3):341–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tsai YH, Joe SW, Chen M-L, Lin CP, Ma HC, Du J-W (2016) Assessing team performance: moderating roles of transactive memory, hypercompetition, and emotional regulation. Hum Perform 29(2):89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Turner JR, Zimmerman T, Allen JM (2012) Teams as a sub-process for knowledge management. J Knowl Manage 16(6):963–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Urban JM, Weaver JL, Bowers CA, Rhodenizer L (1996) Effects of workload and structure on team processes and performance: implications for complex team decision making. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 38(2):300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Urhahn C, Spieth P (2013) Governing portfolio management for innovative new product portfolios: a conceptual framework. Int J Prod Dev 18(5):377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van Helden GJ, Reichard C (2013) A meta-review of public sector performance management research. Tékhne 11(1):10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Waldman JD, Cohn KH (2008) Mending the gap between physicians and hospital executives. In: Cohn KH, Hough DE (eds) The business of healthcare. Praeger, Westport, pp 27–59Google Scholar
  83. Wang M-C, Chen S-S, Chiang J-M (2017) Rationality of the personal loan interest-rate markups of banks. Corp Manag Rev 37(1):115–163Google Scholar
  84. Weaver SJ, Rosen MA, Salas E, Baum KD, King HB (2010) Integrating the science of team training: guidelines for continuing education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 30(4):208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chieh-Peng Lin
    • 1
  • Kuang-Jung Chen
    • 2
  • Chu-Mei Liu
    • 3
  • Chiu-Hui Liao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Chiao Tung UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Applied EnglishChihlee University of TechnologyNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of International BusinessTamkang UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations