Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 683–709 | Cite as

How does interpersonal justice affect outside directors’ governance behavior? A cross-cultural comparison

  • Esther B. Del Brio
  • Rosa M. Hernández-Maestro
  • Toru Yoshikawa
Original Paper

Abstract

We examine the impact of interpersonal justice among outside directors on the board and between a director and the CEO regarding the director’s monitoring and resource provision behaviors in different cultural contexts. We argue that directors from individualistic countries are more influenced by CEO interpersonal justice while directors from collectivistic countries are more affected by the board interpersonal justice. Our main effect results indicate that interpersonal justice with board members is positively related to both monitoring and resource provision by a director, while CEO interpersonal justice is related only to resource provision. Our results also show different effects on the director’s behaviors between three countries, i.e., Canada, Singapore, and Spain. We found that CEO interpersonal justice is positively associated with resource provision in Canada, while board interpersonal justice is positively related to both monitoring and resource provision in Singapore and Spain. These results suggest that directors discharge their board duties differently by how they are treated by other directors and the CEO and that their governance behaviors vary by culture. This study contributes to the literature on comparative corporate governance by showing the differences in directors’ behaviors in different cultural contexts.

Keywords

Board of directors Cross-cultural comparison Interpersonal justice Social exchange Monitoring Resource provision 

Mathematics Subject Classification

62H25 62J05 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, Projects ECO2013-45615-P and ECO2014-53060-R.

References

  1. Adams RB, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J Finance 62(1):217–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2003) The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants. Acad Manag Rev 28(3):447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart J Econ 127(1):137–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewichi RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 43–55Google Scholar
  5. Blau GJ (1964) Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau GJ (1968) Social exchange. In: Sills D (ed) International encyclopaedia of the social sciences. Macmillan, New York, pp 452–458Google Scholar
  7. Boyd BK (1995) CEO duality and firm performance: a contingency model. Strateg Manag J 16(4):301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brett JM, Okumura T (1998) Inter- and intracultural negotiations: US and Japanese negotiators. Acad Manag J 41:495–510Google Scholar
  9. Brockner J, Tyler TR, Cooper-Schneider R (1992) The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: the higher they are, the harder they fall. Adm Sci Q 37(2):241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buck T, Shahrim A (2005) The translation of corporate governance changes across national cultures: the case of Germany. J Int Bus Stud 36(1):42–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buller DB, Burgoon JK (1996) Interpersonal deception theory. Commun Theory 6(3):203–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camerman J, Cropanzano R, Vandenberghe C (2007) The benefits of justice for temporary workers. Group Organ Manage 33(2):176–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter M, Westphal J (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision-making. Acad Manag J 44(4):639–660Google Scholar
  14. Chiaburu DS, Lim AS (2008) Manager trustworthiness or interactional justice? Predicting organizational citizenship behaviors. J Bus Ethics 83(3):453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Child JC (1981) Culture contingency and capitalism in the cross-national study of organizations. Res Organ Behav 3:303–356Google Scholar
  16. Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy CJ (2012) Hiring cheerleaders: board appointments of “independent” directors. Manage Sci 58(6):1039–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol 86(3):356–400Google Scholar
  18. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86(3):425–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cropanzano R, Rupp DE, Mohler CJ, Schminke M (2001) Three roads to organizational justice. In: Research in personnel and human resources management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 1–113Google Scholar
  20. Cropanzano R, Prehar CA, Chen PY (2002) Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Organ Manage 27(3):324–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cropanzano R, Stein JH, Nadisic T (2011) Social justice and the experience of emotion. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalton D, Daily C, Ellstrand A, Johnson J (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 19(3):269–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Daniel SJ, Joshua K, Cieslewicz JK, Pourjalali H (2012) The impact of national economic culture and country-level institutional environment on corporate governance practices: theory and empirical evidence. Manag Int Rev 52(3):365–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Del Brio EG, Yoshikawa T, Connelly CE, Tan WL (2013) The effects of CEO trustworthiness on directors’ monitoring and resource provision. J Bus Ethics 118(1):155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drogendijk R, Slangen A (2006) Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. Int Bus Rev 15:361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fama E (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J Polit Econ 88(2):288–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fama E, Jensen M (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26(2):301–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferris DL, Spence DR, Brown DJ, Heller D (2012) Interpersonal justice of workplace deviance: the role of esteem threat. J Manag 38(6):1788–1811Google Scholar
  30. Finkelstein S, D'Aveni RA (1994) CEO duality as a double-edged sword: how boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Acad Manag J 37(5):1079–1108Google Scholar
  31. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garcia-Castro R, Aguilera RV (2012) A decade of corporate governance reforms in Spain (2000–10). In: Rasheed A, Yoshikawa T (eds) The convergence of corporate governance: Promise and prospects. Palgrave, Houndmills, pp 187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garg S, Eisenhardt K (2016) Unpacking the CEO-board relationship: how strategy-making happens in entrepreneurial firms. Acad Manag J. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0599 Google Scholar
  34. Gillette AB, Noe T, Rebello MJ (2008) Board structures around the world: an experimental investigation. Rev Financ 12:93–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Governance metrics international (GMI) (2010) Country rankings as of September 27, 2010Google Scholar
  36. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenberg J (1993) The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: Cropanzano R (ed) Justice in the workplace. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, pp 79–103Google Scholar
  38. Greenwood R, Magan Diaz A, Li S, Lorente JC (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ Sci 21(2):521–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gulati R, Westphal JD (1999) Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Adm Sci Q 44(3):473–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. A global perspective, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  41. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2017) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  42. He J, Huang Z (2011) Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Acad Manag J 54(6):1119–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Helm S (2005) Designing a formative measure for corporate reputation. Corp Reput Rev 8:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Henseler J, Dijkstra TK, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Diamantopoulos A, Straub DW, Ketchen DJ, Hair JF, Hult GTM, Calantone RJ (2014) Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013). Organ Res Methods 17(2):182–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hernández-Maestro RM, González-Benito O (2014) Rural lodging establishments as drivers of rural development. J Travel Res 53(1):83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hillman AJ, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad Manag Rev 28(3):383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hillman AJ, Nicholson G, Shropshire C (2008) Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organ Sci 19(3):441–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hofstede G (1997) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Homans GC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Am J Sociol 63(6):597–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. House JR, Hamges P, Javidan M, Dorfman WP, Gupta V (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  51. Inglehart R, Basañez M, Diez-Medrano J, Halman L, Luijkx R (2004) Human beliefs and values: a cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 values surveys. Siglo XXI Editores, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  52. Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnson SG, Schnatterly K, Hill AD (2013) Board composition beyond independence social capital, human capital, and demographics. J Manag 39(1):232–262Google Scholar
  54. Kwok CCY, Tadesse S (2006) National culture and financial systems. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J Finance 54(2):471–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Langfred CW (2004) Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Acad Manag J 47:385–399Google Scholar
  57. Lavelle JJ, Rupp DE, Brockner J (2007) Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: the target similarity model. J Manag 33(6):841–866Google Scholar
  58. Li A, Cropanzano R (2009) Do East Asians respond more/less strongly to organizational justice than North Americans? A meta-analysis. J Manag Stud 46(5):787–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Licht NA, Goldschmidt C, Schwartz HS (2005) Culture, law, and corporate governance. Int Rev Law Econ 25(2):229–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98(2):224–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad Manag J 43(4):738–748Google Scholar
  62. Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Am Econ J Appl Econ 5(3):136–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Adm Sci Q 48(1):1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McEvily B, Perrone V, Zaheer A (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ Sci 14:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mehran H (1995) Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. J Financ Econ 38:163–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Morck R, Percy M, Tian G, Yeung B (2005) The rise and fall of the widely held firms: a history of corporate ownership in Canada. In: Morck R (ed) A history of corporate governance around the world: family business groups to professional managers. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 65–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ng SI, Lee JA, Soutar GN (2007) Are Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s value frameworks congruent? Int Mark Rev 24:164–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pavlou PA, Fygenson M (2006) Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Q 30:115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peng MW (2004) Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strat Manag J 25(5):453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The external control of organizations. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Quah M (2006) Singapore companies starting to back away from stock options: survey. The Business Times. 1Google Scholar
  73. Randall DM, Fernandes MF (1991) The social desirability response bias in ethics research. J Bus Ethics 10(11):805–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2015) SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
  75. Rogelberg SG, Stanton JM (2007) Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organ Res Methods 10(2):195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rupp DE, Cropanzano R (2002) Multifoci justice and social exchange relationships. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 89(1):925–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schwartz SH (1994) Beyond individualism/collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values. In: Kim U, Triandis HC, Kagitcibasi C, Choi SC, Yoon G (eds) Individualism and collectivism: theory, methods, and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 85–119Google Scholar
  78. Shao R, Rupp DE, Skarlicki D, Jones KS (2013) Empl justice across cultures: a meta-analytic review. J Manag 39:263–301Google Scholar
  79. Spencer Stuart board index (2008) Board trends and practices of leading Canadian companies. Spencer Stuart, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  80. Spencer Stuart board Index (2010) Board trends and practices of leading Spanish companies. Spencer Stuart, Madrid (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  81. Sundaramaurthy C, Lewis M (2003) Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance. Acad Manag Rev 28(3):397–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tosi H, Gómez-Mejía LR (1994) CEO compensation monitoring and firm performance. Acad Manag J 37:1002–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tosi HL, Greckhamer T (2004) Culture and CEO compensation. Organ Sci 15(6):657–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Triandis H (1989) Cross-cultural studies of individualism-collectivism. In: Berman JJ (ed) Nebraska symposium of motivation: cross-cultural perspective, vol 37. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 41–133Google Scholar
  85. Tsui-Auch LS (2012) Converging divergence in corporate governance in Singapore. In: Rasheed A, Yoshikawa T (eds) The convergence of corporate governance: promise and prospects. Palgrave, Houndmills, pp 169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Van Essen M, van Oosterhout JH, Carney M (2012) Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: a meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Manag 29(4):873–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Walsh JP, Seward JK (1990) On the efficiency of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Acad Manag Rev 15(3):421–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Westphal JD (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: behavioral performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad Manag J 42(1):7–24Google Scholar
  89. Westphal JD, Khanna P (2003) Keeping directors in line: social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Adm Sci Q 48(3):361–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1997) Defections from the inner circle: social exchange reciprocity and the diffusion of board independence in U.S. corporations. Adm Sci Q 42:161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Westphal JD, Stern I (2006) The other pathway to the boardroom: interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Adm Sci Q 51(2):169–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (2013) A behavioral theory of corporate governance: explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. Acad Manag Ann 7(1):607–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Whitman DS, Caleo S, Carpenter NC, Horner MT, Bernerth JB (2012) Fairness at the collective level: a meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. J Appl Psychol 97(4):776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yoshikawa T, Hu H (2016) Organizational citizenship behaviors of directors: an integrated framework of director role-identity and boardroom structure. J Bus Ethics (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  95. Yoshikawa T, Zhu H, Wang P (2014) National governance system, corporate ownership, and roles of outside directors: a corporate governance bundle perspective. Corp Gov Int Rev 22(3):252–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zhu H, Yoshikawa T (2016) Contingent value of director identification: the role of government directors in monitoring and resource provision in an emerging economy. Strateg Manag J 37:1787–1807. doi: 10.1002/smj.2408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esther B. Del Brio
    • 1
  • Rosa M. Hernández-Maestro
    • 1
  • Toru Yoshikawa
    • 2
  1. 1.IME & Dpt. Administración y Economía de la EmpresaUniversity of SalamancaSalamancaSpain
  2. 2.Lee Kong Chian School of BusinessSingapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations