Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 691–716 | Cite as

Drivers of internationalization success: a conjoint choice experiment on German SME managers

  • Sascha Kraus
  • Christine Mitter
  • Felix Eggers
  • Philipp Stieg
Original Paper

Abstract

Internationalization is a common growth strategy for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, SMEs face several challenges within the internationalization process. As SMEs are characterized by limited resources, managers are constantly involved in a decision-making process concerning the allocation of the SMEs’ resources. Therefore, internationalization can be understood as a complex, multidimensional decision process. Based on a set of 2244 internationalization decisions made by German SME managers, the present study examines how eight strategic and structural factors drive the perceived international success of SMEs. When applying conjoint choice analysis, the results suggest that especially equity financing in the internationalization process, an appropriate market selection as well as proactive motives, and a long-term scope can drive SMEs’ international success. Moreover, it becomes evident that strategic factors are more relevant for successful internationalization than structural factors.

Keywords

Internationalization SME Conjoint analysis Choice experiment International success 

JEL Classification

F20 L25 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The project is supported by the International University of Lake Constance (IBH). The International University of Lake Constance is a network of 30 universities and colleges located in Austria, Germany, the Principality of Liechtenstein and Switzerland.

References

  1. Abor JY, Agbloyor EK, Kuipo R (2014) Bank finance and export activities of Small and Medium Enterprises. Rev Dev Finance 4(2):97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs ZJ, Morck R, Shaver JM, Yeung B (1997) The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: a policy perspective. Small Bus Econ 9(1):7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agndal H, Chetty S (2007) The impact of relationship on changes in internationalization strategies of SMEs. Eur J Mark 41(4):1449–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahuja G (2000) The dualty of collaboration. Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strateg Manag J 21(3):317–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aivazian VA, Ge Y, Qiu J (2005) The impact of leverage on firm investment: Canadian evidence. J Corp Finance 11(2):277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali AJ, Camp RC (1993) The relevance of firm size and international business experience to market entry strategies. J Glob Mark 6(4):91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersson S, Gabrielsson J, Wictor I (2004) International activities in small firms: examining factors influencing the internationalisation and export growth of small firms. Can J Adm Sci 21(1):22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armario JM, Ruiz DM, Armario EM (2008) Market orientation and internationalization in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Small Bus Manage 46(4):485–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arregle J, Hitt M, Sirmon D, Very P (2007) The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. J Manage Stud 44(1):73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arregle J-L, Naldi L, Nordqvist M, Hitt MA (2012) Internationalization of family-controlled firms: a study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrep Theory Pract 36(6):1115–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Asmussen CG, Pedersen T, Petersen B (2007) How do we capture ‘global specialization’ when measuring firm’s degree of globalization? Manag Int Rev 47:791–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Astrachan J, Shanker M (2003) Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: a closer look. Fam Bus Rev 16(3):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Banalieva ER, Eddleston KA (2011) Home-region focus and performance of family firms: the role of family vs non-family leaders. J Int Bus Stud 42(8):1060–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bellone F, Musso P, Nesta L, Schiavo S (2010) Financial constraints and firm export behaviour. World Econ 33(3):347–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhaumik SK, Driffield N, Pal S (2010) ‘Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. J Int Bus Stud 41(4):437–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bilkey WJ, Tesar G (1977) The export behavior of smaller Wisconsin manufacturing firms. J Int Bus Stud 9:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bradley M, Jarrell GA, Kim EH (1984) On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence. J Finance 39(3):857–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brazell JD, Diener CG, Karniouchina E, Moore WL, Séverin V, Uldry P-F (2006) The no-choice option and dual response choice designs. Mark Lett 17(4):255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buckley PJ (1989) Foreign direct investment by small and medium sized enterprises: the theoretical background. Small Bus Econ 9(2):89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buckley PJ, Devinney T, Louviere J (2007) ‘Do managers behave the way theory suggests? A choice-theoretic examination of foreign direct investment location decision-making. J Int Bus Stud 38(7):1069–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burgman TA (1996) An empirical examination of multinational corporate capital structure. J Int Bus Stud 27(3):553–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Calia P, Ferrante MR (2013) How do firms combine different internationalisation modes? A multivariate probit approach. Rev World Econ 149(4):663–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Calof J, Beamish P (1995) Adapting to foreign markets: explaining internationalization. Int Bus Rev 4(2):115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Calof JL, Viviers W (1995) Internationalization of small and medium sized South African enterprises. J Small Bus Manage 33(4):71–79Google Scholar
  25. Caves RE (1971) International corporations: the industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica 38(149):38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cavusgil ST (1984a) Organizational characteristics associated with export activities. J Manage Stud 21(1):322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cavusgil ST (1984b) Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. J Bus Res 12(2):195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cerrato D, Piva M (2012) The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: the effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. J Manage Gov 16(4):617–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cesinger B, Fink M, Madsen TK, Kraus S (2012) Rapidly internationalizing ventures: how definitions can bridge the gap across contexts. Manag Decis 50(10):1816–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cesinger B, Bouncken R, Fredrich V, Kraus S (2014) The alchemy of family enterprises’ internationalisation: dexterous movers or prodigal laggards? Eur J Int Manag 8(6):671–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cesinger B, Hughes M, Mensching H, Bouncken R, Fredrich V, Kraus S (2016) A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality. J World Bus 51(4):586–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chan PS, Heide D (1993) Strategic alliances in technology: key competitive weapon. Adv Manag J 58(4):9–17Google Scholar
  33. Chen JP, Cheng A, Jia H, Jawon K (1997) An investigation of the relationship between international activities and capital structure. J Int Bus Stud 28(3):563–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chiao Y-C, Yang K-P, Yu C-MJ (2006) Performance, internationalization, and firm-specific advantages of SMEs in a newly-industrialized economy. Small Bus Econ 26(5):475–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Chittenden F, Hall G, Hutchinson P (1996) Small firm growth, access to capital markets and financial structure: review of issues and an empirical investigation. Small Bus Econ 8(1):59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 24(4):19–39Google Scholar
  37. Claver E, Rienda L, Quer D (2009) Family firms’ international commitment: the influence of family-related factors. Fam Bus Rev 22(2):125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Crick D, Barr P (2007) SMEs’ barriers towards internationalization and assistance requirements in the UK: differences between exporters and firms employing multiple modes of market entry. J Small Bus Entrep 20(3):233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cuervo-Cazurra A, Maloney MM, Manrakhan S (2007) Causes of the difficulties in internationalisation. J Int Bus Stud 38(6):709–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. d’ Artis K (2010) Structural estimation of variety gains from trade integration in Asia. Aust Econ Rev 43(3):270–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. D’Angelo A, Majocchi A, Zucchella A, Buck T (2013) Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: insights from an Italian sample. Int Mark Rev 30(2):80–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. De Clercq D, Sapienza HJ, Crijns H (2005) The internationalization of small and medium-sized firms. Small Bus Econ 24(4):409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dick M, Mitter C, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B, Pernsteiner H (2016) The impact of finance and governance on the internationalisation modes of family firms. Eur Int Manag (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  44. Douglas SP, Craig CS, Keegan WJ (1982) Approaches to assessing international marketing opportunities for small and medium-sized companies. Columbia J World Bus 17(3):26–32Google Scholar
  45. Doukas JA, Pantzalis C (2003) Geographic diversification and agency costs of debt of multinational firms. J Corp Finance 9(1):59–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dreux DRI (1990) financing family business: alternatives to selling out or going public. Fam Bus Rev 3(3):225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dunning JH (1988) The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. J Int Bus Stud 19(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dunning JH (1996) The geographical sources of the competitiveness of firms: some results of a new survey. Transnatl Corp 5(3):1–29Google Scholar
  49. Efrat K, Shoham A (2012) Born global firms: the differences between their short- and long-term performance drivers. J World Bus 47(4):675–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Eggers F, Sattler H (2011) Preference measurement with conjoint analysis. Overview of state-of-the-art approaches and recent developments. GfK Mark Intell Rev 3(1):36–47Google Scholar
  51. Eggers F, Eggers F, Kraus S (2016) Entrepreneurial branding: measuring consumer preferences through choice-based conjoint analysis. Int Entrep Manag J 12(2):427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Etemad H (2004) Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: a grounded theoretical framework and an overview. Can J Adm Sci 21(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Etemad H, Wright RW (1999) Internationalization of SMEs: management responses to a changing environment. J Int Mark 7(4):4–10Google Scholar
  54. Evangelista F (2005) Qualitative insights into the international new venture creation process. J Int Entrep 3(3):179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Fabian F, Molina H, Labianca G (2009) Understanding decisions to internationalize by small and medium-sized firms located in an emerging market. Manag Int Rev 49(5):537–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fama EF, French KR (2002) Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev Financial Stud 15(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fernandez Z, Nieto MJ (2005) Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 18(1):77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Fletcher D (2004) International entrepreneurship and the small business. Entrep Reg Dev 16(4):289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Freeman J, Styles C, Lawley M (2012) Does firm location make a difference to the export performance of SMEs? Int Mark Rev 29(1):88–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Frishammar J, Andersson S (2009) The overestimated role of strategic orientations for international performance in smaller firms. J Int Entrep 7(1):57–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gankema HGJ, Snuif HR, Zwart PS (2000) The internationalization process of small and medium-sized enterprises: an evaluation of stage theory. J Small Bus Manage 38(4):15–27Google Scholar
  62. Gibson C (1989) Consumer trends in the EC: how can retailers respond?. Longman Group, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  63. Gomes L, Ramaswamy K (1999) An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. J Int Bus 30:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Graves C, Thomas J (2008) Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: an examination of family influence. Fam Bus Rev 21(2):151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Graves C, Shan YC (2014) An empirical analysis of the effect of internationalization on the performance of unlisted family and nonfamily firms in Australia. Fam Bus Rev 27(2):142–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hassel A, Höpner M, Kurdelbusch A, Rehder B, Zugehör R (2003) Two dimensions of the internationalization of firms. J Manag Stud 40(3):701–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Heck RKZ, Stafford K (2001) The vital institution of family business: economic benefits hidden in plain sight. In: McCann GK, Upton N (eds) Destroying myths and creating value in family business. Stetson University Press, Deland, pp 9–17Google Scholar
  68. Hennart J-F (2007) The theoretical rationale for a multinationality/performance relationship. Manag Int Rev 47(3):423–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hofstede G (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Read Psychol Cult 2(1). doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  70. Huber J, Zwerina K (1996) The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J Mark Res 33(3):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ietto-Gillies G (1998) Different conceptual frameworks for the assessment of the degree of internationalisation: an empirical analysis of various indices for the top 100 transnational corporations. Transnatl Corp 7(1):17–39Google Scholar
  72. Ietto-Gillies G, London SE (2009) Conceptual issues behind the assessment of the degree of internationalization. Transnatl Corp 18(3):59–83Google Scholar
  73. Jaw Y-L, Cheng C-L (2006) The influence of the Internet in the internationalization of SMEs in Taiwan. Hum Syst Manag 25(3):167–183Google Scholar
  74. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreing market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 18(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1990) The mechanisms of internationalization. Int Mark Rev 7(4):11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J Int Bus Stud 40(9):1411–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kafouros M, Buckley PJ, Sharp JA, Wang C (2008) The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 28:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Khanna T, Palepu K, Sinha J (2005) Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Bus Rev 83(6):63–76Google Scholar
  79. Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35(2):124–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kraus S, Ambos CT, Eggers F, Cesinger B (2015) Distance and perceptions of risk in internationalization decisions. J Bus Res 68(7):1501–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kraus S, Meier F, Eggers F, Bouncken R, Schuessler F (2016a) Standardisation vs. adaption: a conjoint experiment on the influence of psychic, cultural and geographical distance on international marketing mix decisions. Eur J Int Manag 10(2):127–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kraus S, Mensching H, Calabrò A, Cheng CF, Filser M (2016b) Family firm internationalization: a configurational approach. J Bus Res. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.158 Google Scholar
  83. Kreiser PM, Marino LD, Weaver KM (2002) Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: a multi-country analysis. Entrep: Theory Pract 26(4):71–95Google Scholar
  84. Kuhfeld WF, Tobias RD, Garratt M (1994) Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J Mark Res 31(4):545–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kuivalainen O, Puumalainen K, Sintonen S, Kyläheiko K (2010) Organisational capabilities and internationalisation of the small and medium-sized information and communication technology firms. J Int Entrep 8(2):135–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kuo A, Kao M-S, Chang Y-C, Chiu C-F (2012) The influence of international experience on entry mode choice: difference between family and non-family firms. Eur Manag J 30(3):248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Leonidou LC (1995) Export stimulation research: review, evaluation and integration. Int Bus Rev 4(2):133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Leonidou LC, Katsikeas CS (1996) The export development process: an integrative review of empirical models. J Int Bus Stud 27(3):517–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lieberman M, Montgomery D (1998) First-mover (dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 19(12):1111–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Liberman-Yaconi L, Hooper T, Hutchings K (2010) Toward a model of understanding strategic decision-making in micro-firms: exploring the Australian information technology sector. J Small Bus Manage 48(1):70–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Liesch PW, Knight GA (1999) Information internalization and hurdle rates in small and medium enterprise internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 30(1):383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Lohrke FT, Holloway BB, Woolley TW (2010) Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research. Organ Res Methods 13(1):16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lu JW, Beamish PW (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strateg Manag J 22(6/7):565–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lu JW, Beamish P (2006a) SME internationalization and performance: growth vs. profitability. J Int Entrep 4(1):27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Lu JW, Beamish PW (2006b) Partnering strategies and performance of SMEs international joint ventures. J Bus Ventur 21(4):285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Ventur 16(5):429–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lyon DW, Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2000) Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. J Manag 26(5):1055–1085Google Scholar
  99. Malhotra S, Sivakumar K (2011) Simultanous determination of optimal cultural distance and market potential in international market entry. Int Mark Rev 28(6):601–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Mandl I (2008) Overview of family business relevant issues. Final report, project on behalf of the european commission. Austrian Institute for SME Research, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  101. Mandl I, Celikel-Esser F (2012) Born global: the potential of job creation in new international businesses. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  102. Manski C (1977) The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis 8(3):229–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Mathews JA (2002) A resource-based view of schumpeterian economic dynamics. J Evolut Econ 12(1):29–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. McDougall P, Oviatt BM (1996) New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: a follow-up study. J Bus Ventur 11(1):23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. McNaughton R, Bell J (2004) Capital structure and the pace of SME internationalisation. In: Etemad H (ed) International entrepreneurship in small and medium size enterprises: orientation, environment and strategy. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, pp 57–71Google Scholar
  106. Mensching H, Calabrò A, Eggers F, Kraus S (2016) Internationalization of family and non-family firms: a conjoint experiment among CEOs. Eur J Int Manag (in press)Google Scholar
  107. Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2005) Managing for the long run: lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  108. Minkov M, Hofstede G (2012) Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-county regions. Cross Cult Res 46(2):133–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Mishra CS, McConaughy DL (1999) Founding family control and capital structure: the risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):53–64Google Scholar
  110. Mitter C, Emprechtinger S (2016) The role of stewardship in the internationalisation of family firms. Int J Entrep Ventur (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  111. Mitter C, Duller C, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B, Kraus S (2014) Internationalization of family firms: the effect of ownership and governance. RMS 8(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Moen O, Servais P (2002) Born global or gradual global? Examining the behavior of small and medium-sized enterprises. J Int Mark 10(3):49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Muñoz-Bullón F, Sánchez-Bueno MJ (2012) Do family ties shape the performance consequences of diversification? Evidence from the European Union. J World Bus 47(3):469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Mustakallio M, Autio E, Zahra SA (2002) Relational and contractual governance in family firms: effects on strategic decision making. Fam Bus Rev 15(3):205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5(2):147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Nakos G, Brouthers KD, Brouthers LE (1998) The impact of firm and managerial characteristics on small and medium-sized Greek firms’ export performance. J Glob Mark 11(4):23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Naldi L, Nordqvist M (2008) Family firms venturing into international markets: a resource dependence perspective. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp 395–413. MA: Babson College, WellesleyGoogle Scholar
  118. Naldi L, Nordquist M, Sjoeberg K, Wiklund J (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation. Risk taking and performance in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 20(1):33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Nocco A, Ottaviano GIP, Salto M (2014) Monopolistic competition and optimum product selection. Am Econ Rev 104(5):304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. O’Cass A, Weerawerdena J (2009) Examining the role of international entrepreneurship, innovation and international market performance in SME internationalisation. Eur J Mark 43(11/12):1325–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Orengo KM (2012) Internationalization and entrepreneurial orientation. A network perspective: four cases of Puerto Rican SMEs’. AD-Minister 21:55–69Google Scholar
  122. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Park SH, Suh J, Yeung B (2013) Do multinational and domestic corporations differ in their leverage policies? J Corp Finance 20:115–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Peng MW (2001) The resource-based view and international business. J Manag 27(6):803–829Google Scholar
  125. Poutziouris PZ (2001) The views of family companies on venture capital: empirical evidence from the UK small to medium-size enterprising economy. Fam Bus Rev 14(3):277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Raymond L, St-Pierre J, Uwizeyemungu S, Dinh TL (2014) Internationalization capabilities of SMEs: a comparative study of the manufacturing and industrial service sectors. J Int Entrep 12(3):230–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Riahi-Belkaoui A (1998) The effects of the degree of internationalization on firm performance. Int Bus Rev 7(3):315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Ripollés-Meliá M, Menguzzato-Boulard M, Sánchez-Peinado L (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation and international commitment. J Int Entrep 5(1):65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Romano CA, Tanewski GA, Smyrnios KX (2001) Capital structure decision making: a model for family businesses. J Bus Ventur 16(3):285–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Rossi PE, Allenby GM (1993) A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. J Mark Res 30(2):171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Rugman AM (1981) Inside the multinationals: the economics of internal markets. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  132. Rugman AM, Oh CH (2011) Multinational enterprises and regional economic integration: rethinking key metrics in international business. In: International handbook on the economics of integration, vol III. Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
  133. Sanders G, Carpenter MA (1998) Internationalization and firm governance: the roles of CEO compensation, top team composition and board structure. Acad Manag J 41(2):158–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sapienza HJ, Autio E, George G, Zahra SA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):914–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Schweizer R (2012) SMEs and networks: overcoming the liability of outsidership. J Int Entrep 11(1):80–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Schweizer R, Vahlne JE, Johanson J (2010) Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. J Int Entrep 8(4):343–370. doi: 10.1007/s10843-010-0064-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Sciascia S, Mazzola P, Astrachan J, Pieper T (2012) The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: exploring nonlinear effects. Small Bus Econ 38(1):15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Sharma P (2004) An overview of the field of family business studies: current status and directions for the future. Fam Bus Rev 17(1):1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Shoham A, Albaum G (1995) Reducing the impact of barriers to exporting: a managerial perspective. J Int Mark 3(4):85–106Google Scholar
  140. Sirmon D, Hitt MA (2003) Managing resources: linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27(4):339–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Sommer L (2009) Degree of internationalization – a multidimensional challenge. J Appl Bus Res 25(3):93–106Google Scholar
  142. Stieg P, Kraus S, Bouncken RB (2014) Assessing the landscape of SME internationalization: a review of existing literature. J Int Bus 14(3):173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March JG (ed) Handbook of organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 142–193Google Scholar
  144. Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strateg Manag J 21(8):791–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Tan A, Brewer P, Liesch PW (2007) Before the first export decision: internationalisation readiness in the pre-export phase. Int Bus Rev 16(3):294–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Tatoglu E, Demirbag M, Kaplan G (2003) Motives for retailer internationalization to Central and Eastern Europe. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 39(4):40–57Google Scholar
  147. Thompson K, Knox S (1991) The single European grocery market: prospects for channel crossing. Eur Manag J 9(1):65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Thomsen S, Pedersen T (2000) Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strateg Manag J 21(6):689–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Trudgen R, Freeman S (2014) Measuring the performance of born-global firms throughout their development process: the roles of initial market selection and internationalisation speed. Manag Int Rev 54(4):551–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. United Nations Conference on Trade and development (UNCTAD) (2007) The Universe of the largest transnational corporations. UNCTAD current studies on FDI and development, no 3. United Nations, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  151. Venkataraman S, Van de Ven AH, Buckeye J, Hudson R (1990) Starting up in a turbulent environment: a process model of failure among firms with high customer dependence. J Bus Ventur 5(5):277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Vernon R (1971) Sovereignty at bay: the multinational spread of US enterprise. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  153. Verwaal E, Donkers B (2002) Firm size and export intensity: solving an empirical puzzle. J Int Bus Stud 33(3):603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Wlömert N, Eggers F (2016) Predicting new service adoption with conjoint analysis: external validity of BDM-based incentive-aligned and dual-response choice designs. Mark Lett 27(1):195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Xi JM, Kraus S, Filser M, Kellermanns FW (2015) Mapping the field of family business research: past trends and future directions. Int Entrep Manag J 11(1):113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Xie YH, Suh T (2014) Perceived resource deficiency and internationalization of small- and medium-sized firms. J Int Entrepr 12(3):207–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad Manag J 38(2):341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Zaheer S, Mosakowski E (1997) The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services. Strateg Manag J 18(6):439–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Zahra SA (2003) International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvment. J Bus Ventur 18(4):495–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Zahra S (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36(1):20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Zhou L, Wu A, Barnes BR (2012) The effects of early internationalization on performance outcomes in young international ventures: the mediating role of marketing capabilities. J Int Mark 20(4):882–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Zou S, Stan S (1998) The determinants of export performance: a review of the empirical literature between 1987 and 1997. Int Mark Rev 15(5):333–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Zuchella A, Scabini P (2007) International entrepreneurship, theoretical foundations and practices. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sascha Kraus
    • 1
  • Christine Mitter
    • 2
  • Felix Eggers
    • 3
  • Philipp Stieg
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein
  2. 2.Salzburg University of Applied SciencesPuch/SalzburgAustria
  3. 3.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations