Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 605–631 | Cite as

Understanding the links among innovation performance, market performance and financial performance

  • Osman Gök
  • Sinem Peker
Original Paper

Abstract

Innovation and its impacts on business performance are strategically vital deliberations for modern business organizations. In this study, we examine how innovation performance affects two different facets of firm performance: market performance and financial performance. Many studies address the relationship between innovation and business performance, but few empirical studies analyze the interplay between those variables. Research results reveal a suppression effect of market performance on the innovation–financial performance relationship. We find a negative direct relationship between innovation and financial performance; however, market performance reverses this negative effect to a positive total influence through its suppression effect. This result indicates the vital role of market performance in converting innovation to positive financial outcomes. The proposed mediation model is relevant regardless of the set of firm-level and environmental contingency variables.

Keywords

Innovation performance Market performance Financial performance Innovation 

JEL Classification

62H15 62H20 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Survey data used in this research is a section of “Marketing Department-Turkey Research Project (MARDEP)” and the project is partly funded by Yasar University R&D and Application Center-YAGEM. Grant No.: BAP2014/002.

References

  1. Aas TH, Pedersen PE (2011) The impact of service innovation on firm-level financial performance. Serv Ind J 31(13):2071–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achrol RS, Stern LW (1988) Environmental determinants of decision making uncertainty in marketing channels. J Mark Res 25(February):36–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg Manag J 22(3):197–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach. Psycholog Bull 103(3):411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson EW, Sullivan MW (1993) The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Mark Sci 12(2):125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andries P, Faems D (2013) Patenting activities and firm performance: does firm size matter? J Prod Innov Manag 30(6):1089–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14(August):396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atuahene-Gima K (1996) Market orientation and innovation. J Bus Res 35(2):93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Augusto M, Coelho F (2009) Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength, and environmental forces. Ind Mark Manag 38:94–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Auh S, Merlo O (2012) The power of marketing within the firm: its contribution to business performance and the effect of power asymmetry. Ind Mark Manag 41(5):861–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Avlonitis GJ, Kouremenos A, Tzokas N (1994) Assessing the innovativeness of organizations and its antecedents: project innovstrat. Eur J Mark 28(11):5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baker MJ, Black CD, Hart SJ (1988) The competitiveness of British industry: what really makes the difference? Eur J Mark 22(2):70–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Balkin DB, Markman GD, Gomez-Mejia LR (2000) Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? Acad Manag J 43(6):1118–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  16. Bayus B, Erickson G, Jacobson R (2003) The financial rewards of new-product introductions in the personal computer industry. Manag Sci 49(2):197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad Manag Rev 28:238–256Google Scholar
  18. Bowen FE, Rostami M, Steel P (2010) Timing is everything: a meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. J Bus Res 63(11):1179–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown S, Eisenhardt K (1995) Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad Manag Rev 20(2):343–378Google Scholar
  20. Cainelli G, Evangelista R, Savona M (2004) The impact of innovation on economic performance in services. Serv Ind J 24(1):116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Calantone RJ, Schmidt JB, Song XM (1996) Controllable factors of new product success: a cross-national comparison. Mark Sci 15(4):341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability and firm performance. Ind Mark Manag 31:331–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Capon N, Farley JU, Hoenig S (1990) Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis. Manag Sci 36:1143–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ceccagnoli M (2009) Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 30(1):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (1998) Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to Cannibalize. J Mark Res 35(November):474–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cheng CC, Krumwiede D (2010) The effects of market orientation and service innovation on service industry performance: an empirical study. Oper Manag Res 3:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cheung GW, Lau RS (2008) Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organ Res Methods 11:296–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Choi SB, Williams C (2013) Innovation and firm performance in Korea and China: a cross-context test of mainstream theories. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 25(4):423–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Christensen CM (1997) The innovator’s dilemma. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Churchill GA Jr (1991) Marketing research: methodological foundations, 5th edn. The Dryden Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1987) New products: what separates winners from losers? J Prod Innov Manag 4:169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34:555–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Damanpour F, Evan WM (1984) Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Adm Sci Q 29:392–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Damanpour F, Evan WM (1990) The adoption of innovations over time: structural characteristics and performance of organizations. In: Proceedings of National Decision Science Institute Conference, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  35. Damanpour F, Gopalakrishnan S (1998) Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change. J Eng Technol Manag 15(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Damanpour F, Gopalakrishnan S (2001a) The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. J Manag Stud 38(1):45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Damanpour F, Gopalakrishnan S (2001b) The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organisations. J Manag Stud 38:45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Damanpour F, Szabat KA, Evan WM (1989) The relationship between types of innovation and organisational performance. J Manag Stud 26:587–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. De Clercq D, Thongpapanl N, Dimov D (2011) The moderating role of organizational context on the relationship between innovation and firm performance. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 58(3):431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. De Jong JPJ, Bruins A, Dolfsma W, Meijgaard J (2003) Innovation in service firms explored: what, how and why? Strategic study B200205. EIM Business and Policy Research, ZoetermeerGoogle Scholar
  41. Drechsler W, Leeflang PSH, Natter M (2013) Improving marketing’s contribution to new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 30(2):298–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eccles RG (1991) The performance measurement manifesto. Harv Bus Rev 69(1):131–137Google Scholar
  43. Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods 12(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Eurostat (2015) GDP and main components: output, expenditure and income. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Update 24 June 2015
  45. Evanschitzky H, Eisend M, Calantone RJ, Jiang Y (2012) success factors of product innovation: an updated meta-analysis. J Prod Innov Manag 29:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Foster RN, Kaplan S (2001) Creative destruction: why companies that are built to last underperform the market—and how to successfully transform them. Currency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Geroski PA, Machin S (1992) Do innovating firms outperform non-innovators? Bus Strategy Rev 3(2):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Geroski PA, Machin S, Van Reenen J (1993) The profitability of innovating firms. RAND J Econ 24(2):198–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ginsberg A, Venkatraman N (1985) Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: a critical review of the empirical research. Acad Manag Rev 10(3):421–434Google Scholar
  50. Gopalakrishnan S, Bierly PE II (2006) The impact of firm size and age on knowledge strategies during product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 1:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Acad Manag J 46(6):685–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Mark Sci 12(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Griffin A, Page AL (1993) An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. J Prod Innov Manage 10(September):291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gunday G, Ulusoy G, Kılıç K, Alpkan L (2011) Effects of innovation types on firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 133(2):662–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Han JK, Kim N, Srivastava RK (1998) Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link? J Mark 62(4):30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Henard DH, Szymanski DM (2001) Why some new products are more successful than others. J Mark Res 38(August):362–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hogan SJ, Coote LV (2014) Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: a test of Schein’s Model. J Bus Res 67(8):1609–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Homburg C, Jensen O (2007) The thought worlds of marketing and sales: which differences make a difference? J Mark 71(3):124–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Homburg C, Pflesser C (2000) A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: measurement issues and performance outcomes. J Mark Res 37(4):449–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hooley GJ, Greenley GE, Cadogan W, Fahy J (2005) The performance impact of marketing resources. J Bus Res 58(1):18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hult GTM, Hurley RF, Knight GA (2004) Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance. Ind Mark Manag 33(5):429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1997) Product development cycle time and organizational performance. J Mark Res 34(1):13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1998) Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. J Acc Res 36(Suppl):1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52(11):1661–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jayachandran S, Hewett K, Kaufman P (2004) Customer response capability in a sense-and-respond era: the role of customer knowledge process. J Acad Mark Sci 32(3):219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jiménez-Jiménez D, Sanz-Valle R (2011) Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. J Bus Res 64(4):408–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kafouros MI, Buckley PJ, Sharp JA, Wang C (2008) The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 28:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kerin RA, Varadarajan PR, Peterson RA (1992) First-mover advantage: a synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. J Mark 56(4):33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kessler EH, Chakrabarti AK (1996) Innovation speed: a conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Acad Manag Rev 21(4):1143–1191Google Scholar
  70. Kitchell S (1995) Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption. J Acad Mark Sci 23(Summer):195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35(2):124–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Li H, Atuahene-Gima K (2001) Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in china. Acad Manag J 14(6):1123–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First-mover advantages. Strateg Manag J 9(Summer):41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lindell MK, Brandt CJ (2000) Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. J Appl Psychol 85(3):331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lindell MK, Whitney D (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol 86(1):114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM (2000) Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci 1(4):173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manag Sci 52(12):1865–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mansury MA, Love JH (2008) Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: a firm-level analysis. Technovation 28(1–2):52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McGrath RG, Tsai M-H, Venkataraman S, MacMillan IC (1996) Innovation, competitive advantage, and rent: a model and test. Manag Sci 42(3):389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Menon A, Bharadwaj SG, Adidam P Tej, Edison SW (1999) Antecedents and consequences of marketing strategy making: a model and a test. J Mark 63(2):18–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Moorman C, Rust RT (1999) The role of marketing. J Mark 63(Special Issue):180–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ngo LV, O’Cass A (2012) In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority: the role of market orientation, marketing capability, and innovation capability interactions. J Prod Innov Manag 29(5):861–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nijssen EJ, Hillebrand B, Vermeulen PAM, Kemp RGM (2006) Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. Int J Res Mark 23(3):241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Noruzy A, Dalfard VM, Azhdari B, Nazari-Shirkouhi S, Rezazadeh A (2013) Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(5–8):1073–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometic theory, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  86. O’Cass AG, Ngo LV (2011) Winning through innovation and marketing: lessons from Australia and Vietnam. Ind Mark Manag 40(8):1319–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pauwels KH, Silva-Risso JM, Srinivasan S, Hanssens DM (2004) New products, sales promotions, and firm value: the case of the automobile industry. J Mark 68(October):142–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(2):531–544Google Scholar
  89. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  90. Prajogo DI (2006) The relationship between innovation and business performance: a comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowl Process Manag 13(3):218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Prajogo D, McDermott C, McDermott M (2013) Innovation orientations and their effects on business performance: contrasting small and medium-sized service firms. R&D Manag 43(5):486–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Adressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42(1):185–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ramaswami SN, Srivastava RK, Bhargava M (2009) Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing’s contribution to firm value. J Acad Mark Sci 37(2):97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Roberts PW, Amit R (2003) The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: the case of Australian retail banking 1981–1995. Organ Sci 14(2):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rosenbusch N, Brinckmann J, Bausch A (2011) Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. J Bus Ventur 26(4):441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rubera G, Kirca AH (2012) Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J Mark 76(May):130–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  98. Sharma A, Lacey N (2004) Linking product development outcomes to market valuation of the firm: the case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J Acad Mark Sci 21(5):297–308Google Scholar
  99. Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 7(4):422–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Simpson PM, Siguaw JA, Enz CA (2006) Innovation orientation outcomes: the good and the bad. J Bus Res 59:1133–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sood A, Tellis GJ (2009) Do innovations really pay off? Total stock market returns to innovation. Mark Sci 28(3):442–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sorescu AB, Spanjol J (2008) Innovation’s effect on firm value and risk: insights from consumer packaged goods. J Mark 72(March):114–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sorescu AB, Chandy R, Prabhu JC (2003) Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: insights from pharmaceuticals. J Mark 67(October):82–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Srinivasan S, Pauwels K, Silva-Risso J, Hanssens DM (2004) Staying ahead in the innovation race: new-product introductions and relative firm value. Working paper, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  105. Srinivasan S, Pauwels K, Silva-Risso J, Hanssens DM (2009) Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. J Mark 73(January):24–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Srivastava RK, Fahey L, Christensen HK (2001) The resource-based view and marketing: the role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. J Manag 27(6):777–802Google Scholar
  107. Stock RM, Reiferscheid I (2014) Who should be in power to encourage product program innovativeness, R&D or marketing? J Acad Mark Sci 42(3):264–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Su Z, Xie E, Liu H, Sun W (2013) Profiting from product innovation: the impact of legal, marketing, and technological capabilities in different environmental conditions. Mark Lett 24:261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Subramanian A, Nilakanta S (1996) Organisational Innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organisational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organisational performance. Omega Int J Manag Sci 6:631–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Szymanski DM, Kroff MW, Troy LC (2007) Innovativeness and new product success: insights from cumulative evidence. J Acad Mark Sci 35(1):35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tatikonda MV, Montoya-Weiss MM (2001) Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: the influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Manag Sci 47(1):151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Tellis GJ, Prabhu JC, Chandy RK (2009) Radical innovation across nations: the preeminence of corporate culture. J Mark 73(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Theoharakis V, Hooley G (2008) Customer orientation and innovativeness: differing roles in new and old Europe. Int J Res Mark 25:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Thornhill S (2006) Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. J Bus Ventur 21:687–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68(January):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Verhoef PC, Leeflang PSH (2009) Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. J Mark 73(2):14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Verona G (1999) A resource-based view of product development. Acad Manag Rev 24(1):132–142Google Scholar
  118. Vincent LH, Bharadwaj SG, Challagalla GN (2005) Does innovation mediate firm performance?: A meta-analysis of determinants and consequences of organizational innovation. Singapore Management University working paper, #1305Google Scholar
  119. Werker C (2003) Innovation, market performance, and competition: lessons from a product life cycle model. Technovation 23(4):281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wernerfelt B (1984) A Resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 2:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wolfe RA (1994) Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. J Manag Stud 31(3):405–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wu YC, Lin BW, Chen CJ (2013) How do internal openness and external openness affect innovation capabilities and firm performance? IEEE Trans Eng Manag 60(4):704–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Yalcinkaya G, Calantone RJ, Griffith DA (2007) An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities: implications for product innovation and market performance. J Int Mark 15(4):63–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zhou KZ, Yim CK, Tse DK (2005) The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. J Mark 69(2):42–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BusinessYasar UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsYasar UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations