Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Problematization and conceptualization of “entrepreneurial SME Management” as a field of research: overcoming the size-based approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to position the field of small-and-medium-sized-enterprise Management (SME Management). For this purpose, we define a core principle that provides the identity of the field of SME Management and delineates it from other disciplines. In developing this principle, we apply a prescriptive approach which delineates an object of cognition with its native problems by defining an identity principle. This involves the claim to be able to generate statements that apply to all companies of this type on the one hand, but not to all types of SMEs on the other. This makes it possible to effectively achieve progress in knowledge within the meaning of gradual conceptual convergence in SME Management Research. The resulting conceptualization turns SME Management into “entrepreneurial SME Management”: Within the field of entrepreneurial SME Management, decisions and processes in companies regardless of their size and age are of interest as long as they have not become routine yet. These innovative development processes involve qualitative change and require developmental competences (e.g. dynamic capabilities), namely an organizational entrepreneurial mindset, organizational learning competences and organizational implementation competences. This conceptualization of an entrepreneurial SME Management also helps reconnect SME Management and Entrepreneurship and make overlapping areas visible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiginger K, Tichy G (1984) Die Groesse der Kleinen Die ueberraschenden Erfolge kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmungen in den achtziger Jahren. Signum, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Albach H (1984) Die Innovationsdynamik der mittelstaendischen Industrie. In: Albach H, Held TH (eds) Betriebswirtschaftslehre mittelstaendischer Unter-nehmen. Schaeffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad Manage Rev 36(2):247–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belz C, Travella R (1999) Marketingfaehigkeiten von mittelstaendischen Unter-nehmen—Studie Deutschland. Universitaet St. Gallen, Ernst & Young, St.Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  • Berney RE, Owens E (1984) Small business policy: subsidization, neutrality, or discri-mi-nation. J Small Bus Manag 22(2):49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooksbank R (1991) Defining the small business: a new classification of company size. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 3(1):17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunninge O, Nordqvist M, Wiklund J (2007) Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: the effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Bus Econ 29(3):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson DJ (1985) The evolution of marketing in small firms. Eur J Mark 19(5):7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaston I, Badger B, Sadler-Smith E (2001) Organizational learning: An empirical assessment of process in small UK manufacturing firms. J Small Bus Manag 39(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran J, Blackburn R (2001) Researching the small enterprise. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Amboise G, Muldowney M (1988) Management theory for small business: attempts and requirements. Acad Manag Rev 13(2):226–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandridge TC (1979) Children are not “little-grown-ups”: small business needs its own organizational theory. J Small Bus Manag 17(2):53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge RH, Robbins JE (1992) An empirical investigation of the organisational lifecycle model for small business development and survival. J Small Bus Manag 30(1):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank H, Lueger M (1997) Reconstructing development processes: conceptual basis and empirical analysis of setting up a business. Int Stud Manag Organ 27(3):34–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank H, Kessler A, Fink M (2010) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance–a replication study. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 62(2):175–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank H, Kessler A, Lueger, M, Weismeier-Sammer D (2013) Organizational learning and organizational innovation orientation: a new systems Theory Perspective. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Business Innovation and Technology Management, IEEE Press, Beijng, pp 42–46

  • Franke N, Doemoetoer R (2008) Innovativitaet von Klein- und Mittelbetrieben: Gestal-tungsvariablen, Konfigurationen und Erfolgswirkungen. In: Frank H, Neubauer H, Roessl D (eds) Beitraege zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Klein- und Mittel-be-triebe. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 139–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich E, Pichler HJ (1988) Werte und Typen mittelstaendischer Unternehmer. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fueglistaller U, Gasda MJ, Volery T, Weber W (2008) Gedanken zu einer Be-triebs-wirt-schaftslehre der Klein- und Mittelunternehmen vor dem Wirken von Josef Mugler. In: Frank H, Neubauer H, Roessl D (eds) Beitraege zur Betriebs-wirt-schaftslehre der Klein- und Mittel-be-triebe. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire DA, Noël MX, Déry R, Béchard J-P (2006) Is There Conceptual Convergence In Entrepreneurship Research? A Co-Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004. Entrep Theory Pract 30(3):333–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms R, Kraus S, Schwarz EJ (2009) The suitability of the configuration approach in entre-preneurship research. Entre Reg Dev 21(1):25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt J, Salomo S (2011) Innovations management, 5th edn. Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P, McAdam R, Leckey J (2005) Longitudinal evaluation of innovation implementation in SMEs. Eur J Innov Manag 8(3):283–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde GB (1988) Die relative Betriebstiefe als strategischer Erfolgsfaktor. Zeitschrift fuer Betriebswirtschaft 58(1):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch W (1983) Fingerspitzengefuehl und Hemdsaermeligkeit bei der Planung im Mittel-stand. In: Kirsch W, Roventa P (eds) Bausteine eines Strategischen Mana-gements. Dialoge zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis, De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp 399–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckertz A, Mandl Ch (2014) Small Business and Entrepreneurship Research: Disentangling a Complicated Relationship. Paper presented at the ISCB World Conference, Dublin

  • Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mugler J (1998) Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Klein- und Mittelbetriebe (Vol. I), 3rd edn. Springer, Vienna, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mugler J (1999) Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Klein- und Mittelbetriebe (Vol. II), 3rd edn. Springer, Vienna, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray P (2003) Organisational learning, competencies, and firm performance: empirical observations. Learn Organ 10(4/5):305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale P, Coad A (2013) Muppets and gazelles: political an methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Ind Corp Change 23(1):113–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen EJ, Hillebrand B, Vermeulen PAM (2005) Unraveling willingness to cannibalize: a closer look at the barrier to radical innovation. Technovation 25(12):1400–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl HC (2006a) Abgrenzung der Klein- und Mittelbetriebe von Grossbetrieben. In: Pfohl HC (ed) Betriebswirt-schaftslehre der Mittel- und Kleinbetriebe—groessen-spezifische Probleme und Moeglichkeiten zu ihrer Loesung, 4th edn. Erich Schmidt, Berlin, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl HC (2006b) Unternehmensfuehrung. In: Pfohl HC (ed) Betriebswirt-schaftslehre der Mittel- und Kleinbetriebe—groessen-spezifische Probleme und Moeglichkeiten zu ihrer Loesung, 4th edn. Erich Schmidt, Berlin, pp 79–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl HC (2006c) Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Mittel- und Kleinbetriebe—groessenspezifische Probleme und Moeglichkeiten zu ihrer Loesung, 4th edn. Erich Schmidt, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleitner HJ (1984) Beobachtungen und Ueberlegungen zur Person des mittel-staen-dischen Unter-nehmers. In: Albach H, Held Th (eds) Betriebswirtschaftslehre mittelstaendischer Unter-nehmen. Schaeffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 511–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):761–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scase R, Goffee R (1980) The real world of the business owner. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachner M, Speckbacher G, Wentges P (2006) Steuerung mittelstaendischer Unter-nehmen: groesseneffekte und Einfluss der Eigentums- und Fuehrungs-struktur. Zeitschrift fuer Betriebswirtschaft 76(6):589–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenz R (2011) Managementherausforderung fuer oesterreichische Klein- und Mittel-unternehmen. Key note speech, Vienna

  • Schmidt AG (1995) Der Einfluss der Unternehmensgroesse auf die Rentabilitaet von Industrie-unternehmen. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyoegg G (2007) Unternehmensfuehrung/Management. In: Koehler R, Kuepper HU, Pfingsten A (eds) Handwoerterbuch der Betriebswirtschaft, 6th edn. Schaeffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 1812–1821

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyoegg G (2008) Organisation. Grundlagen moderner Organisationsgestaltung, 5th edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte R (2010) Wozu KMU-Management? Zur Notwendigkeit spezifischer Manage-ment-ansaetze fuer kleine und mittlere Unternehmen. In: Kathan D, Letmathe P, Mark K, Schulte R, Tchouvakhina MV, Wallau F (eds) Wert-schoep-fungs-mana-gement im Mittelstand. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp VII–XIII

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D (1990) Small is beautiful, but difficult: towards cost-effective research for small business. J Mark Res Soc 32(1):37–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2008) Entrepreneurship: a field of dreams? Acad Manag Ann 2(1):517–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann H, Schreyoegg G (2005) Management: Grundlagen der Unternehmens-fueh-rung Konzepte—Funktionen—Fallstudien, 6th edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stepan A (2009) Corporate entrepreneurship, cluster und innovations-mana-gement. In: Frank H (ed) Corporate entre-preneur-ship, 2nd edn. Facultas, Vienna, pp 167–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson HH, Jarillo JC (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial Management. Strateg Manag J 11(4):17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March JG (ed) Hand-book of organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 142–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey DJ (1994) Understanding the small business sector. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2012) Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurship action. J Manag Stud 49(8):1395–1401. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrès O, Julien PA (2005) Specificity and denaturing of small business. Int Small Bus J 23(4):355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich H (1985) Von der Betriebswirtschaftslehre zur systemorientierten Manage-ment-lehre. In: Wunderer R (ed) Betriebswirtschaftslehre als Management- und Fuehrungslehre. Schaeffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Varis M, Littunen H (2010) Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. Eur J Innov Manag 13(2):128–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales WJG, Vishal K, Mousa FT (2013) Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Int Small Bus J 31(4):357–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh JA, White JF (1981) A small business is not a little big business. Harvard Bus Rev 59(4):18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer PMJ, Theodorakopoulos N (2000) Small business development and the “learning organisation”. IJEBR 6(4):239–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 12(3):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegment

The authors would like to thank professors Rainer Harms, Reinhard Schulte, Gerhard Speckbacher, Peter Witt and Michael Woywode for their valuable input during a workshop on SME Management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Small Business Management and Entrepreneurship, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, Bldg D1, 1020, Vienna, Austria

    Hermann Frank & Dietmar Roessl

Authors
  1. Hermann Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dietmar Roessl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Frank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frank, H., Roessl, D. Problematization and conceptualization of “entrepreneurial SME Management” as a field of research: overcoming the size-based approach. Rev Manag Sci 9, 225–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0154-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0154-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation