Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 85–104 | Cite as

Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships

  • Roberto Fernández-Gago
  • Laura Cabeza-García
  • Mariano Nieto
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the empirical evidence relating corporate social responsibility (CSR), board composition, and firm performance. Using a sample of Spanish listed firms included in the IBEX 35 over the period 2005–2010 the results show that the percentage of independent directors affect firm CSR activities, and that this effect is moderated by the resources available to the firm (measured by return on assets). Also, the CSR has a mediating role on the relation between the independence of the board of directors and firm value. These results hold for other board characteristics (board size and women as directors).

Keywords

CSR Board composition Board independence Firm value Resources available 

JEL Classification

M14 G30 

References

  1. Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact of governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams RB, Mehran H (2005) Corporate performance, board structure and its determinants in the banking industry. In: EFA 2005 Moscow meetingsGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  4. Albinger HS, Freeman SJ (2000) Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. J Bus Ethics 28:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allouche J, Laroche P (2006) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: a survey. In: Allouche J (ed) Corporate social responsibility: performance and stakeholders. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 3–40Google Scholar
  6. Amato L, Amato CH (2007) The effects of firm size and industry in corporate living. J Bus Ethics 72:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arora P, Dharwadkar R (2011) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): the moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corp Gov Int Rev 19:136–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagnoli M, Watts SG (2003) Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. J Econ Manag Strategy 12:419–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baird P, Gylani P (2012) Corporate social and financial performance re-examined: industry effects in a linear mixed model analysis. J Bus Ethics 109:367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120Google Scholar
  12. Baron DP (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J Econ Manag Strategy 10:7–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baron DP (2008) Managerial contracting and corporate social responsibility. J Public Econ 92:268–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bear S, Rhaman N, Post C (2010) Impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J Bus Ethics 97:201–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bebchuk LA, Weisbach MS (2010) The state of corporate governance research. Rev Financ Stud 23:939–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bebchuk LA, Grinstein Y, Peyer U (2010) Lucky CEOs and lucky directors. J Financ 65:2363–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Becchetti L, Ciciretti R, Hasan I, Kobeissi N (2012) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder value. J Bus Res 65:1628–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bénabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77(305):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Béthoux E, Didry C, Mias A (2007) What codes of conduct tell us: corporate social responsibility and the nature of the multinational corporation. Corp Gov Int Rev 15:77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bhagat S, Black B (2002) The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance. J Corp Law 27:231–274Google Scholar
  22. Boeker W, Goodstein J (1993) Performance and successor choice: the moderating effects of governance and ownership. Acad Manag J 36:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bollen KA, Stine R (1990) Direct and indirect effects: classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Soc Methodol 20:115–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32:946–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A (2010) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J Bus Ethics 83:435–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carroll AB (1979) A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 4:497–505Google Scholar
  27. Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts. Int J Manag Rev 12:85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cespa G, Cestone G (2007) Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. J Econ Manag Strategy 16:741–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chhaochharia V, Grinstein Y (2009) CEO compensation and board structure. J Financ 64:231–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Coffey BS, Wang J (1998) Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. J Bus Ethics 17:1595–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  32. Cuadrado-Ballesteros B, García-Rubio R, Martínez-Ferrero J (2014) Effect of the composition of the board of director son corporate social responsibility. Span Account Rev (in press). doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.02.003
  33. Dahya J, Dimitrov O, McConnell J (2008) Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: a cross-country analysis. J Financ Econ 87:73–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dalton D, Daily C, Johnson J, Ellstrand A (1999) Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manag J 42:674–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L (1997) Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad Manag Rev 22:20–47Google Scholar
  36. De Miguel A, Pindado J, De la Torre C (2004) Ownership structure and firm value: new evidence from Spain. Strateg Manag J 25:1199–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. De Villiers C, Naiker V, Van Staden CJ (2011) The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. J Manag 37:1636–1663Google Scholar
  38. Diller J (1999) A social conscience in the global marketplace? Labour dimensions of codes of conduct, social labelling and investor initiatives. Int Labour Rev 138:99–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Donker H, Poff D, Zahir S (2008) Corporate values, codes of ethics, and firm performance: a look at the Canadian context. J Bus Ethics 82:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fassin Y, Van Rossem A (2009) Corporate governance in the debate on CSR and ethics: sense making of social issues in management by authorities and CEOs. Corp Gov Int Rev 17:573–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fernández Sánchez JL, Luna L, Baraibar E (2011) The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: a structural equation model analysis. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ferrero-Ferrero I, Fernández-Izquierdo MA, Muñoz-Torres MJ (2012) The impact of the board of directors characteristics on corporate performance and risk-taking before and during the global financial crisis. RMS 6:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ferrero-Ferrero I, Fernández-Izquierdo MA, Muñoz-Torres MJ (2013) Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: an empirical study of board diversity. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag (in press). doi:10.1002/csr.1333
  44. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  45. García-Castro R, Ariño MA, Canela MA (2010) Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. J Bus Ethics 92:107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gillan SL (2006) Recent developments in corporate governance: an overview. J Corp Financ 12:381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harjoto M, Jo H (2011) Corporate governance and CSR nexus. J Bus Ethics 100:45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Haslam S, Ryan MK, Kulich C, Trojanowski G, Atkins C (2010) Investing with prejudice: the relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. Br J Manag 21:484–497Google Scholar
  49. Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr 76:408–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hillman A, Keim G (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strateg Manag J 22:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Himmelberg C, Hubbard R, Palia D (1999) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. J Financ Econ 53:353–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Holmbeck GN (1997) Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the Chile-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J Consult Clin Psychol 65:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Holmbeck GN (2002) Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. J Pediatr Psychol 27:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hung H (2011) Directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility. A stakeholder perspective. J Bus Ethics 103:385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ibrahim NA, Angelidis JP (1995) The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: are there differences between inside and outside directors? J Bus Ethics 14:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jackling B, Johl S (2009) Board structure and firm performance: evidence form India’s top companies. Corp Gov Int Rev 17:492–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jamali D, Safieddine AM, Rabbath M (2008) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corp Gov Int Rev 16:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jensen MC, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jo H, Harjoto MA (2011) Corporate governance and firm value: the impact of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 103:351–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jo H, Harjoto MA (2012) The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 106:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Johnson RA, Greening DW (1999) The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad Manag J 42:564–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kassinis G, Vafeas M (2002) Boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strateg Manag J 23:399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE (1998) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. PWS-KENT Publishing Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  64. Kurucz EC, Colbert BA, Wheeler DC (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Seigel D (eds) The oxford handbook on corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–112Google Scholar
  65. Lafuente E, Bayo-Moriones A, García-Cestona MA (2010) ISO-9000 certification and ownership structure: effects upon firm performance. Br J Manag 21:649–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lenox M, Nash J (2003) Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: a comparison across four trade association programs. Bus Strategy Environ 12:343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lo S, Sheu HJ (2007) Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corp Gov Int Rev 15:345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mackey A, Mackey TB, Barney JB (2007) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad Manag Rev 32:817–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychol Methods 7:83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mak Y, Kusnadi Y (2005) Size really matters: further evidence on negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pac-Basic Financ J 13:301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Marquardt DW (1980) You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 75:87–91Google Scholar
  72. Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett SC (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: the political economy of corporate environmentalism. J Law Econ 43:583–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg Manag J 21:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Profit maximizing corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 26:504–505Google Scholar
  75. Mínguez-Vera A, Martín-Ugedo JF (2007) Does ownership structure affect value? A panel data analysis for the Spanish market. Int Rev Financ Anal 16:81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mishra S, Suar D (2010) Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? J Bus Ethics 95:571–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moore G (2001) Corporate social and financial performance: an investigation in the UK supermarket industry. J Bus Ethics 34:299–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Muth M, Donalson L (1998) Stewardship theory and board structure: a contingency approach. Corp Gov Int Rev 6:5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24:403–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Parrino R, Weisbach MS (1999) Measuring investment distortions arising from stockholder-bondholder conflicts. J Financ Econ 53:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev 80(12):56–68Google Scholar
  82. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92Google Scholar
  83. Prado-Lorenzo JM, García-Sánchez I, Gallego-Álvarez I (2009) Características del consejo de administración e información en materia de responsabilidad social corporativa. Rev Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 38(141):107–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Preston LE, O’Bannon D (1997) The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Bus Soc 36:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Prior D, Surroca J, Tribó JA (2008) Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corp Gov Int Rev 16:160–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rausch A (2011) Reconstruction of decision-making behavior in shareholder and stakeholder theory: implications for management accounting systems. Rev Manag Sci 5:137–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Reverte C (2009) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J Bus Ethics 88:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ruhnka J, Boerstler H (1998) Governmental incentives for corporate self-regulation. J Bus Ethics 17:309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sahin K, Basfirinci CS, Ozsalih A (2011) The impact of board composition on corporate financial and social responsibility performance: evidence form public-listed companies in Turkey. Afr J Bus Manag 5:2959–2978Google Scholar
  91. Salama A, Anderson K, Toms JS (2011) Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 20:192–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Scherer A, Palazzo G, Baumann D (2006) Global rules and private actors, toward a new role of the TNC in global governance. Bus Ethics Q 16:502–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sethi SP (2002) Standards for corporate conduct in the international arena: challenges and opportunities for multinational corporations. Bus Soc Rev 107:20–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Shleifer A, Vishny R (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52:737–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 7:422–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Simpson WG, Kohers T (2002) The link between corporate social and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. J Bus Ethics 35:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models’. In: Leinhardt S (ed) Sociological methodology 1982. American Sociological Association, Washington, pp 290–312Google Scholar
  98. Surroca J, Tribó JA, Waddock S (2010) The role of intangible resources in explaining the relationship between corporate responsibility and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 31:463–490Google Scholar
  99. Van Den Berghe LA, Levrau A (2004) Evaluating boards of directors: what constitutes a good corporate board? Corp Gov Int Rev 12:461–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Waddock S, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Walls J, Berrone P, Phan P (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link? Strateg Manag J 33:885–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wang J, Coffey BS (1992) Board composition and corporate philanthropy. J Bus Ethics 11:771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  104. Wintoki MB, Lickn J, Netter J (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J Financ Econ 105:581–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wood DJ (2010) Measuring corporate social performance: a review. Int J Manag Rev 12:50–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wotruba T (1997) Industry self-regulation: a review and extension to a global setting. J Public Policy Mark 16:38–54Google Scholar
  107. Zeng SX, Xu XD, Yin HT, Tam CM (2012) Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. J Bus Ethics 109:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zhao X, Lynch JG, Quimei C (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res 37:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Fernández-Gago
    • 1
  • Laura Cabeza-García
    • 1
  • Mariano Nieto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of LeónLeónSpain

Personalised recommendations