Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of molecular testing for Mycoplasma genitalium for symptomatic women

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mycoplasma genitalium is an emerging cause of sexually transmitted infections (STI) with a capacity to rapidly develop antibiotic resistance. The aim of this work was to carry out an evaluation and descriptive analysis of routine molecular testing of M. genitalium in symptomatic women at the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin January 2018-December 2019. 1972 specimens were tested from1291 individual symptomatic female patients > 18 years old. The median age was 29 (range 18–71). There were 10 confirmed positive specimens (0.77%); median patient age 26 (range 18–34); seven were obstetrics/gynaecology patients and three were attendees at a sexual assault treatment unit (SATU). The prevalence of positive cases in the ≥ 18 ≤ 30-year-old age group (n = 683) was six times that of the ≥ 30 year-old age group (n = 608) at 1.3% versus 0.2%. Patient symptoms included: discharge in five (50%); pelvic pain on examination in five (50%); abdominal pain in two (20%); pelvic bleeding in two (20%); dyspareunia in two (20%) patients. Co-infections were present in three patients (30%). Macrolide resistance was detected in two positives (28.6%). This initial pilot study prompts the following recommendations which require further study and consideration: 1. promotion of M. genitalium status to notifiable disease; 2 widespread screening of female population not warranted; 3. M. genitalium testing for women symptomatic for STIs; 4. antibiotic resistance testing of all positive cases. 5. Further research into other potential risk groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Availability of data and material

Data has not been made available due to the sensitive nature of the data.

References

  1. Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE (2015) Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 61:418–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tully JG, Cole RM, Taylor-Robinson D, Rose DL (1981) A newly discovered Mycoplasma in the human urogenital tract. Lancet 317:1288–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92461-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumann L, Cina M, Egli-Gany D et al (2018) Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 94:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birger R, Saunders J, Estcourt C et al (2017) Should we screen for the sexually-transmitted infection Mycoplasma genitalium? Evidence synthesis using a transmission-dynamic model. Sci Rep 7:16162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16302-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandez-Huerta M, Barbera MJ, Serra-Pladevall J et al (2020) Mycoplasma genitalium and antimicrobial resistance in Europe: a comprehensive review. Int J STD AIDS 31:190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462419890737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chrisment D, Charron A, Cazanave C et al (2012) Detection of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium in France. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2598–2601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor-Robinson D (2014) Diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection: sobering thoughts. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 12:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2014.919220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen JS, Cusini M, Gomberg M, Moi H (2016) 2016 European guideline on Mycoplasma genitalium infections. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol 30:1650–1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soni S, Horner P, Rayment M et al (2019) 2018 BASHH national guideline for the management of infection with Mycoplasma genitalium. Int J STD AIDS 30:938–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Golden MR, Workowski KA, Bolan G (2017) Developing a public health response to Mycoplasma genitalium. J Infect Dis 216:S420–S426. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. M. genitalium Working Group (2020) Guidance on Mycoplasma genitalium testing and management in Ireland, January 2020

  12. Lillis RA, Martin DH, Nsuami MJ (2019) Mycoplasma genitalium infections in women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic in New Orleans. Clin Infect Dis 69:459–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cina M, Baumann L, Egli-Gany D et al (2019) Mycoplasma genitalium incidence, persistence, concordance between partners and progression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 95:328–335. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oakeshott P, Aghaizu A, Hay P et al (2010) Is Mycoplasma genitalium in women the “new chlamydia?” A community-based prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 51:1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1086/656739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernández-Huerta M, Barberá M-J, Esperalba J et al (2020) Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium and macrolide resistance among asymptomatic people visiting a point of care service for rapid STI screening: a cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Infect 96:300–305. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2020) Chlamydia infection. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2018. Stockholm

  17. Sonnenberg P, Ison CA, Clifton S et al (2015) Epidemiology of Mycoplasma genitalium in British men and women aged 16–44 years: evidence from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). Int J Epidemiol 44:1982–1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv194

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandoz KM, Rockey DD (2010) Antibiotic resistance in Chlamydiae. Future Microbiol 5:1427–1442. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.10.96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baetselier I, Kenyon DC, Vanden Berghe W et al (2020) An alarming high prevalence of resistance associated mutations to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium in Belgium: results from samples collected between 2015–2018 Sex Transm Infect 054511 https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040840

  20. Machalek DA, Tao Y, Shilling H et al (2020) Prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis S1473–3099:30154–30157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30154-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mulligan V, Lynagh Y, Clarke S et al (2019) Prevalence, macrolide resistance, and fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium in men who have sex with men attending an sexually transmitted disease clinic in Dublin, Ireland in 2017–2018. Sex Transm Dis 46:e35–e37. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Microbiology Laboratory at the Rotunda Hospital for their help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation: CB, ME and RD. Methodology: CB, ME and RD. Formal analysis and contextual interpretation: CB, JS, ME and RD. Writing original draft preparation: CB. Writing—review and editing: CB, JL, ME and RD. Approval of final written version: CB, ME, JL and RD.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Drew.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethics approval granted by Rotunda Hospital Research Advisory Group RAG-2020–005.

Consent to participate

This was done as a retrospective study and data was anonymised at time of extraction. It was non-interventional and express consent was not sought from individual patient. Issues around consent were addressed in the ethics submission.

Consent for publication

The study contains irrevocably anonymised patient data and consent for publication was not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brehony, C., Eogan, M., Lambert, J.S. et al. Evaluation of molecular testing for Mycoplasma genitalium for symptomatic women. Ir J Med Sci 191, 1771–1775 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02782-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02782-1

Keywords

Navigation