Skip to main content
Log in

Taking histories: joint working of disciplines in medical history scholarship

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

While there is an increasing emphasis on the value of interdisciplinarity in scholarship in the medical humanities, it is unknown to what extent there is joint working between historians and clinicians in medical history. We aimed to quantify evidence of joint working in authorship of medical history papers.

Methods

Observational survey of authorship. We studied authorship data in all papers published in the three major medical history journals between 2009 and 2019 (n = 634).

Results

The majority of medical history papers is written by single authors with single disciplinary affiliations (68%), most commonly history (65%): fewer than one paper in seven (14%) shows evidence of joint working between disciplines in authorship. A minority of papers (8%) are written by authors with primary medical affiliations. Almost three-quarters (71%) of papers have an acknowledgements section, but only 6% shows clear evidence of joint working between disciplines in the acknowledgements.

Conclusions

Scholarship engaging both historians and clinicians is rare in medical history journals. Possible solutions include enhanced research collaborations between historians and clinicians, interdisciplinary educational seminars and cross-institutional knowledge exchanges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Data available from corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Evans HM, Macnaughton J (2004) Should medical humanities be a multidisciplinary or an interdisciplinary study? Med Humanit 30:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmh.2004.000143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burnham JC (1999) A brief history of medical practitioners and professional historians as writers of medical history. Health Hist 1:250–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/40111358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (1980) Medical history without medicine. J Hist Med Allied Sci 35:5–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/XXXV.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kushner HI (2008) Medical historians and the history of medicine. Lancet 372:710–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61293-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Humphreys M (2019) The social history of medicine: some thoughts (and questions). Soc Hist Med 3:11–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkz113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Porter R, Micale M (1994) Introduction: reflections on psychiatry and its histories. In: Micale MS, Porter R (eds) Discovering the history of psychiatry. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  7. King R, Al-Khabouri J, Kelly B et al (2019) Authorship in the medical humanities: breaking cross-field boundaries or maintaining disciplinary divides? J Med Humanit. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-019-09585-7

  8. Nair KM, Dolovich L, Brazil K, Raina P (2008) It’s all about relationships: a qualitative study of health researchers’ perspectives of conducting interdisciplinary health research. BMC Health Serv Res 8:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Coates C (1999) Interpreting academic acknowledgements in English studies: professors, their partners, and peers. Engl Stud Can Esc 25:253–276. https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.1999.0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul-Hus A, Desrochers N (2019) Acknowledgements are not just thank you notes: a qualitative analysis of acknowledgements content in scientific articles and reviews published in 2015. PLoS One 14:e0226727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. McNutt MK, Bradford M, Drazen JM et al (2018) Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to all stages of this paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Linus Wong or Brendan D. Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duma, D., Wong, L., O’Neill, D. et al. Taking histories: joint working of disciplines in medical history scholarship. Ir J Med Sci 190, 1533–1535 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02511-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02511-8

Keywords

Navigation