Skip to main content

Safety culture in a major accredited Irish university teaching hospital: a mixed methods study using the safety attitudes questionnaire

Abstract

Background

The measurement of safety culture, the way in which members of an organisation think about and prioritise safety, in a hospital can provide valuable insight and inform quality improvement strategies.

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe the safety culture of a university teaching hospital in the Republic of Ireland.

Methods

This is a mixed methods survey study using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). The SAQ was distributed to all staff in the study hospital. Staff attitudes towards six domains of patient safety culture were assessed over 32 Likert-scaled items. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data.

Results

A total of 768 staff members completed and returned a copy of the SAQ. The hospital scored above the international benchmark in five out of six domains, indicating a positive safety culture, but scored below the international benchmark in the domain ‘Working Conditions’. This positive safety culture was not mirrored in the qualitative data, from which five themes emerged; three major—Staffing Issues, Patient-Focused Care and Hospital Environment—and two minor—Safe Reporting Culture and Training and Education.

Conclusions

In this study, a mixed methods approach was successfully used to investigate the safety culture in a large Irish hospital. Although the SAQ results indicated a positive safety culture, the qualitative data revealed a number of issues that the hospital staff felt impacted negatively on patient safety. The results of this study will inform future work on the design of an intervention to improve patient safety in the hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm.; 2017. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255263/WHO-HIS-SDS-2017.6-eng.pdf;jsessionid=3E1008872FACBAF6C1DA69CEEE3A753F?sequence=1

  2. 2.

    National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. What Is a Medication Error?; 2015. http://www.nccmerp.org/%0Aabout-medication-errors, accessed 19 September 2016

  3. 3.

    Groves PS (2014) The relationship between safety culture and patient outcomes: results from pilot meta-analyses. West J Nurs Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945913490080

  4. 4.

    Sorra J, Gray L, Streagle S, et al. Hospital survey on patient safety culture: user’s guide.; 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kaya S, Barsbay S, Karabulut E (2010) The Turkish version of the safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties and baseline data. Qual Saf Heal Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.032003

  6. 6.

    Nguyen G, Gambashidze N, Ilyas SA, Pascu D (2015) Validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire (short form 2006) in Italian in hospitals in the northeast of Italy. BMC Health Serv Res 15:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0951-8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Boussat B, Kamalanavin K, François P (2018) The contribution of open comments to understanding the results from the hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPS): a qualitative study. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196089

  8. 8.

    Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB et al (2006) The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-44

  9. 9.

    Relihan E, Glynn S, Daly D, Silke B, Ryder S (2009) Measuring and benchmarking safety culture: application of the safety attitudes questionnaire to an acute medical admissions unit. Ir J Med Sci 178(4):433–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0352-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Centre for Healthcare Quality and Safety, University of Texas. https://med.uth.edu/chqs/survey/

  11. 11.

    IBM Corp (2016) Released 2016. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk, NY, IBM Corp

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

  13. 13.

    QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software

  14. 14.

    Wall M. HSE warns of potential €881m funding crisis in 2018. The Irish Times. January 22, 2018

  15. 15.

    Wall M. Billions required to repair healthcare system, consultants say. The Irish Times September 18, 2017

  16. 16.

    Humphries N, Crowe S, McDermott C, McAleese S, Brugha R (2017) The consequences of Ireland’s culture of medical migration. Hum Resour Health 15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0263-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Clarke N, Crowe S, Humphries N, Conroy R, O’Hare S, Kavanagh P, Brugha R (2017) Factors influencing trainee doctor emigration in a high income country: a mixed methods study. Hum Resour Health 15:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0239-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Donegan L, O’Donnell J. Influenza season influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses in Ireland, 2017/2018. HSE Health Protection Surveillance Centre Annual Epidemiological Report.; 2018

  19. 19.

    McMullan C, Brown GD, O’Sullivan D (2016) Preparing to respond: Irish nurses’ perceptions of preparedness for an influenza pandemic. Int Emerg Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2015.10.004

  20. 20.

    Kristensen S, Badsberg JH, Rischel V, Anhøj J, Mainz J, Bartels P (2015) The patient safety climate in Danish hospital units. Dan Med J

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the staff of the study hospital who gave their time to complete the survey.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura L. Gleeson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors A Delaney and D O’Mahony are employed by the study hospital; however, they were not involved in data analysis or writing the manuscript.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gleeson, L.L., Tobin, L., O’Brien, G.L. et al. Safety culture in a major accredited Irish university teaching hospital: a mixed methods study using the safety attitudes questionnaire. Ir J Med Sci 189, 1171–1178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02228-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Safety culture
  • Patient safety
  • Quality improvement
  • Medication safety
  • Irish healthcare