Skip to main content
Log in

Managing opioid consumption after caesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Caesarean delivery is the most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide and pain management after caesarean delivery remains challenging. Finding a balance between sufficient postoperative pain relief and excess sedation secondary to opioids is often difficult in this patient population. This quality improvement project aimed to manage the amount of opioid consumption after caesarean delivery using a new postoperative analgesic regimen.

Methods

The current practice was analysed in 52 patients before introducing the new regimen. Oxycodone consumption, pain scores and quality of recovery were recorded. Following this pre-implementation audit, a new postoperative analgesic protocol was introduced. All patients received standard doses of intrathecal morphine, paracetamol and diclofenac. Regular oxycodone sustained-release (SR) was replaced with oxycodone immediate-release (IR) as needed. These changes also coincided with education to improve midwifery assessment of pain and the delivery of analgesia.

Results

The outcome measures were re-audited in 178 patients which showed that oxycodone consumption had reduced median (IQR) 30 mg (20–40) vs 10 mg (5–15) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the pain scores between the before and after groups at rest median (IQR) 2.0 (0–4.8) vs 2.0 (0.8–4.0) or at movement 5.0 (3.0–6.0) vs 5.0 (3.0–6.3) (p = 0.292, p = 0.482 respectively). The quality of recovery scores were also equivalent mean (SD) 78.6 (20.6) vs 77.8 (19.0) (p = 0.792).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that postoperative opioid consumption can be reduced with specific analgesic protocols and allow us to improve patient’s quality of recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W (2013) Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 118:934–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong CA, Girard T (2018) Undertreated or overtreated? Opioids for postdelivery analgesia. Br J Anaesth 121:339–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neil MJ, Bannister J (2015) When acute pain becomes chronic. Anaesthesia 70:779–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E et al (2018) Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 122:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy N, Mills P (2018) Controlled-release opioids cause harm and should be avoided in management of postoperative pain in opioid naïve patients. Br J Anaesth S0007-0912:30711–30716

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand’homme P, Landau R, Houle TT (2008) Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain 140:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin J, Peng L, Chen Q et al (2016) Prevalence and risk factors for chronic pain following cesarean section: a prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol 16:99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright JD, Huang Y, Melamed A et al (2019) Use and misuse of opioids after gynecologic surgical procedures. Obstet Gynecol 134:250–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Opioid overdose. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/index.html. [Accessed 16 October 2019]

  10. Lee B, Schug SA, Joshi GP, Kehlet H, PROSPECT Working Group (2018) Procedure-specific pain management (PROSPECT) – an update. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 32:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Australia and New Zealand College of Anaesthesia (2018) Position statement on the use of slow-release opioid preparations in the treatment of acute pain. Available from: http://www.anzca.edu.au/resources/endorsed-guidelines/positionstatement-on-the-use-of-slow-release-opio. [Accessed 25 January 2020]

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the women who helped make this quality improvement initiative a success. We also thank the midwives, post-anaesthetic care unit nurses, anaesthetic clinic, anaesthetists and obstetricians for their diligence and patience.

Author statement

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Ruairi Irwin and Glenn Paul Abela. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ruairi Irwin, with other authors reading and approving the final version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruairi Irwin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was a quality improvement initiative not requiring local ethical committee approval.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irwin, R., Abela, G.P., Stanescu, S. et al. Managing opioid consumption after caesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative. Ir J Med Sci 189, 1069–1072 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02201-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02201-x

Keywords

Navigation