Abstract
Background
In Europe, adverse drug reactions and drug interactions are the cause of considerable morbidity and mortality. In over 75s, hospital access due to adverse drug reactions can be as high as 1 in every 3.
Aims
To assess the quality of the prescribed polytherapies in the territory, in terms of the risk of drug interactions and of prescription appropriateness, in over 75s.
Methods
Randomly selected patients, over 75s, were analysed among the patients of 3 general practitioners. Their data were analysed with the INTERCheck® software. This software provided the list of drug interactions deriving from the chronic therapies. The program also provided the Beers criteria and the STOPP criteria related to the drugs, highlighting potentially inappropriate drugs.
Results
A total of 188 patients were included in the study. A total of 216 serious or very serious drug interactions have been identified. A total of 92 patients (48.9%) were at risk of at least one serious or very serious interaction. The cut-off of the correlation between the number of drugs taken and the risk of incurring a serious or very serious interaction was found to be 5 (AUC = 0.833, sensitivity = 87%, p < 0.001). Patients on ≥ 4 drugs were at risk of prescriptive inappropriateness with a sensitivity of 84% (AUC = 0.781, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Focusing on patients with at least 4 drugs in therapy is the right strategy to reduce the risks associated with polypharmacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mazzola P, Rimoldi SML, Rossi P et al (2016) Aging in Italy: the need for new welfare strategies in an old country. Gerontologist 56:383–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv152
European Commission (2018) The 2018 Ageing Report: economic and budgetary projections for the EU member states (2016–2070).
Edwards IR, Aronson JK (2000) Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 356:1255–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9
Hazell L, Shakir SAW (2006) Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf 29:385–396. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
Ribeiro-Vaz I, Santos CC, Cruz-Correia R (2016) Promoting adverse drug reaction reporting: comparison of different approaches. Rev. Saude Publica 50:14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006122
Chan M, Nicklason F, Vial JH Adverse drug events as a cause of hospital admission in the elderly. Intern Med J 31:199–205
Becker ML, Kallewaard M, Caspers PWJ et al (2007) Hospitalisations and emergency department visits due to drug-drug interactions: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16:641–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1351
Laursen J, Kornholt J, Betzer C et al (2018) General practitioners’ barriers toward medication reviews in polymedicated multimorbid patients: how can a focus on the pharmacotherapy in an outpatient clinic support GPs? Heal Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 5:2333392818792169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392818792169
By the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel (2015) American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 63:2227–2246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13702
Hamilton H, Gallagher P, Ryan C et al (2011) Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria and the risk of adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 171:1013–1019. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.215
Antoniazzi S, Chiarelli MT, Nobili A et al (2015) The value of software that provides clinically relevant information on drug interactions. Eur J Intern Med 26:e52–e53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.07.004
Mantelli S, Jungo KT, Rozsnyai Z et al (2018) How general practitioners would deprescribe in frail oldest-old with polypharmacy — the LESS study. BMC Fam Pract 19:169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0856-9
Green JL, Hawley JN, Rask KJ (2007) Is the number of prescribing physicians an independent risk factor for adverse drug events in an elderly outpatient population? Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 5:31–39
Nobili A, Pasina L, Tettamanti M et al (2009) Potentially severe drug interactions in elderly outpatients: results of an observational study of an administrative prescription database. J Clin Pharm Ther 34:377–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01021.x
Bjerrum L, Andersen M, Petersen G, Kragstrup J (2003) Exposure to potential drug interactions in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 21:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430310001806
Johnell K, Klarin I (2007) The relationship between number of drugs and potential drug-drug interactions in the elderly: a study of over 600,000 elderly patients from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Drug Saf 30:911–918. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200730100-00009
Iyer S, Naganathan V, McLachlan AJ, Le Couteur DG (2008) Medication withdrawal trials in people aged 65 years and older: a systematic review. Drugs Aging 25:1021–1031. https://doi.org/10.2165/0002512-200825120-00004
Urzal J, Pedro AB, Oliveira IF et al (2019) Inappropriate prescribing to elderly patients in an internal medicine ward. Acta Med Port 32:141–148. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.10683
Forgacs I, Loganayagam A (2008) Overprescribing proton pump inhibitors. BMJ 336:2–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39406.449456.BE
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Rinaldi, Dr. Verdi and Dr. Perosino for making their databases, their patients and their work available to the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petrini, E., Caviglia, G.P., Pellicano, R. et al. Risk of drug interactions and prescription appropriateness in elderly patients. Ir J Med Sci 189, 953–959 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02148-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02148-8