Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acceptability and accuracy of oral fluid drug testing for patients on methadone maintenance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Methadone maintenance is currently the predominant form of opioid substitution treatment available in the Republic of Ireland. Prescribing decisions currently involve urine testing for drug use. Urine testing may involve provision of a supervised sample in some circumstances, despite recommendations made in 2010 to abandon this practice.

Aims

This project aims to evaluate the accuracy and acceptability of oral fluid testing for patients on methadone maintenance and also gather patient views on their treatment.

Methods

Patients attending for methadone maintenance at 4 general practices were invited to take part in this study, which involved taking an additional oral fluid test and a questionnaire.

Results

Fifty-five patients agreed to participate. Fifty-two (95%) found the oral fluid test acceptable, and almost two-thirds would prefer to see it used instead of urine testing. Oral fluid provided similar results to urine testing for all drugs except benzodiazepines. Self-report identified cocaine and opiate use not detected by oral fluid or urine testing.

Conclusion

This study presents evidence that oral fluid testing is acceptable to most patients. While oral fluid testing was inferior to urine testing for benzodiazepines, it may have an adjunctive role to play in methadone maintenance provision. Patients reported more negative than positive aspects of methadone maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GP:

General practice

RoI:

Republic of Ireland

References

  1. Health Service Executive (HSE), Ireland. 2017. Clinical guidelines for opioid substitution treatment. Available at: https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/primary/clinical-guidelines-for-opioid-substitution-treatment.pdf (Accessed 14/03/2019)

  2. Health Service Executive (HSE), Ireland. 2014. Clinical guidelines for opioid substitution treatment. Available at: https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/primary/clinical-guidelines-for-opioid-substitution-treatment-ost-.html (Accessed 20/04/2018)

  3. Farrell M & Barry J. Health Service Executive Social Inclusion Unit, HSE, Dublin, Ireland (2010). The introduction of the opioid treatment protocol.

  4. Magura S, Kang SY. National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., New York, NY 10013, USA. Subst Use Misuse. 1996 Jul;31(9):1131-53. Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: a meta-analytical review.

  5. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series. 2006; 6(21): 1–54. Optimum methadone compliance testing - an evidence-based analysis health quality.

  6. Verstraete AG (2004) Detection times of drugs of abuse in blood, urine, and oral fluid. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 26(2):200–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Health Research Board (HRB) National drug-related deaths index 2004 to 2016 Data. Available at: https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/30174/13/National_Drug-Related_Deaths_Index_2004_to_2016_data.pdf (Accessed 22/3/2019)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the general practitioners and the patients who agreed to participate in this study.

Funding

This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Oral fluid testing kits were purchased by the lead author from Alere toxicology (total cost €800) following unsuccessful attempts to procure research funding. Neither the lead author or any of the authors are in any way associated with this private company nor any other provider of drug testing equipment.

As urine testing is the standard of care in Ireland, all 4 participating general practices had free access to urinary testing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Edmund O’Callaghan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Trinity College Dublin/Health Service Executive (TCD/HSE) GP Training Scheme Ethics Committee.

Glossary

Point-of-care testing:Testing for drug metabolites at the point-of-care (i.e., result available immediately such that it can impact on current consultation)

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• First study of views of patients on methadone maintenance in Ireland

• Oral fluid testing acceptable to 95% of patients

• Oral fluid testing non-inferior to urine testing for all drugs except benzodiazepines

• General practitioners in favor of oral fluid testing in that it provides an additional method of evaluating patient stability

Prior publication

The material presented herein has not been published in any other journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Callaghan, M.E., Regan, L., Wilson, M. et al. Acceptability and accuracy of oral fluid drug testing for patients on methadone maintenance. Ir J Med Sci 189, 557–561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02106-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02106-4

Keywords

Navigation