Skip to main content
Log in

Patient experience in a surgical assessment unit following a closed-loop audit using a Kaizen Lean system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Acute Surgical Assessment Unit (ASAU) in University Hospital Limerick (UHL) has provided a solution to overcrowding and long waiting times since centralization of emergency services to UHL. Recognising the importance of its evolving role, the ASAU in UHL has recently undergone a major revamp to ease the pressure in the overcrowded emergency department (ED). This included a new purpose state-of-the-art-built unit and equipment, improved staffing levels and use of a Kaizen Lean system to identify key area of delays and inefficiency with subsequent implementation of suggestions derived after Kaizen Lean. Patient satisfaction reporting was analysed in the older building and subsequently in the new site post Kaizen Lean to complete a closed-loop audit. The aim of the study was to examine patient satisfaction response rates with the ASAU prior to and following Kaizen Lean implementation and transfer to a new purpose-built unit.

Methods

The survey comprised of two phases. In phase 1, 100 questionnaires were distributed to patients in ASAU (older building, pre-Kaizen Lean). In phase 2, the survey was repeated (100 patients) after Kaizen Lean implementation and transfer to the new state-of-the-art unit. Questionnaire design was based on WHO strategy on responsiveness measurement guidelines and was tailored to a population of surgical patients. Results were analysed using IBM SPSS, version 21 and Excel 2013.

Results

Two hundred questionnaires were analysed. Implementation of suggestions derived post Kaizen Lean translated into improved resource usage with reduced waiting time to be seen by nurses and doctors. Patients had better awareness about their treatment plan and planned next steps in the management. Satisfaction across different domains, perceptions of privacy and overall treatment were also improved.

Conclusions

A Kaizen Lean approach improved the transition of an ASAU to a new purpose-built unit and further improved overall patient satisfaction with services of the ASAU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yellen E, Davis GC, Ricard R (2002) The measurement of patient satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Care Quality [Internet];16(4). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jncqjournal/Fulltext/2002/07000/The_Measurement_of_Patient_Satisfaction.5.aspx

  2. al Qatari G, Haran D (1999) Determinants of users’ satisfaction with primary health care settings and services in Saudi Arabia. Int J Qual Health Care 11(6):523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dagger TS, Sweeney JC (2006) The effect of service evaluations on behavioral intentions and quality of life. J Serv Res 9(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. http://www.rcsi.ie/files/surgery/docs/20170922121629_ASAU-Standard.pdf

  5. What is the difference between Kaizen, Lean & Six Sigma? [Internet]. Available from: https://in.kaizen.com/blog/post/2015/09/11/what-is-the-difference-betweenkaizen-lean%2D%2Dsix-sigma.html

  6. Jacobson GH, McCoin NS, Lescallette R, Russ S, Slovis CM (2009) Kaizen: a method of process improvement in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 16(12):1341–1349

  7. Health system responsiveness [Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/responsiveness/en/

  8. Model of Care for Acute Surgery National Clinical Programme in Surgery [Internet]. Available from: http://www.rcsi.ie/files/surgery/20131216021838_Model%20of%20Care%20for%20Acute%20Surger.pdf

  9. Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J (2011) Determinants of patient satisfaction: a study among 39 hospitals in an in-patient setting in Germany. Int J Qual Health Care 23(5):503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. https://in.kaizen.com/blog/post/2015/09/11/what-is-the-difference-between-kaizen-lean%2D%2Dsix-sigma.html

  11. Radnor ZJ, Holweg M, Waring J (2012) Lean in healthcare: the unfilled promise? Soc Sci Med 74(3):364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donabedian A (1988 Sep 23) The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA 260(12):1743–1748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dickson EW, Singh S, Cheung DS, Wyatt CC, Nugent AS (2009) Application of lean manufacturing techniques in the emergency department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 37(2):177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Otani K, Waterman B, Faulkner KM, Boslaugh S, Dunagan WC (2010) How patient reactions to hospital care attributes affect the evaluation of overall quality of care, willingness to recommend, and willingness to return. J Healthc Manag 55(1)

  15. Freeman T (2016) Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Serv Manag Res 15(2):126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ullah MF, Fleming CA, Mealy K (2019) Ir J med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02062-z

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Fahad Ullah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, M.F., Fleming, C., Fox, C. et al. Patient experience in a surgical assessment unit following a closed-loop audit using a Kaizen Lean system. Ir J Med Sci 189, 641–647 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02105-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02105-5

Keywords

Navigation