Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Utilization and appropriateness in cervical spine trauma imaging: implementation of clinical decision support criteria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

To rationalize the ordering of trauma cervical spine radiographs via the institution of electronic clinical decision support criteria.

Methods

In February 2017, we added evidence-based criteria to the electronic imaging ordering system so that requesting clinicians had to indicate which criteria the patient met. We subsequently compared numbers of cervical spine trauma films requested by the ED in comparable months prior to and after the intervention.

Results

The total number of ED trauma cervical spine radiographs reduced by 30.7%, from 182 (in March and April 2016) to 126 (in March and April 2017). The proportion of requests clinically indicated increased from 76.7% (140/182) to 99.2% (125/126). There were no fractures in the 2016 period. 1.6% (2/126) had fractures in the 2017 group.

Conclusion

Introduction of clinical indication criteria to the electronic ordering system for cervical spine radiographs in trauma patients reduced the total number of requests by 30.7% while increasing the proportion which were indicated to 99.2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Kanwar R, Delasobera BE, Hudson K, Frohna W (2015) Emergency department evaluation and treatment of cervical spine injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am 33(2):241–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 343(2):94–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ, Laupacis A, Schull M, McKnight RD, Verbeek R, Brison R, Cass D, Dreyer J, Eisenhauer MA, Greenberg GH, MacPhail I, Morrison L, Reardon M, Worthington J (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 286(15):1841–1848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rawson JV, Cronin P (2014) Decision support: the super highway between health services research and change in clinical practice. Acad Radiol 21(9):1081–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Beroes JM, Ewing BA, Shekelle PG (2015) Electronic health record-based interventions for improving appropriate diagnostic imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 162(8):557–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R (2005) Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spineinjury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma 58(5):902–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daffner, R, Weismann, B, Wippold, F et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Trauma. Available at https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69359/Narrative/

  8. Min A, Chan VWY, Aristizabal R, Peramaki ER, Agulnik DB, Strydom N, Ramsey D, Forster BB (2017) Clinical decision support decreases volume of imaging for low back pain in an urban emergency department. J Am Coll Radiol 14(7):889–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raja AS, Ip IK, Prevedello LM, Sodickson AD, Farkas C, Zane RD, Hanson R, Goldhaber SZ, Gill RR, Khorasani R (2012) Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology. 262(2):468–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blackmore CC, Mecklenburg RS, Kaplan GS (2011) Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 8(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sistrom CL, Dang PA, Weilburg JB, Dreyer KJ, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH (2009) Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology. 251(1):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dick EA, Varma D, Kashef E, Curtis J (2016) Use of advanced imaging techniques during visits to emergency departments--implications, costs, patient benefits/risks. Br J Radiol 89(1061):20150819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. European Society of Radiology (2010) The future role of radiology in healthcare. Insights Imaging 1(1):2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ (2014) Continued growth in emergency department imaging is bucking the overall trends. J Am Coll Radiol 11(11):1044–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee TH, Brennan TA (2002) Direct-to-consumer marketing of high-technology screening tests. N Engl J Med 346(7):529–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SI, Saokar A, Dreyer KJ, Weilburg JB, Thrall JH, Hahn PF (2007) Does radiologist recommendation for follow-up with the same imaging modality contribute substantially to high-cost imaging volume? Radiology. 242(3):857–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP, Bosma J, Casarella WJ, Erickson BA, Maynard CD, Thrall JH, Wallner PE (2010) Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology. 257(1):240–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iglehart JK (2006) The new era of medical imaging--progress and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 354(26):2822–2828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carswell A (2015) Improving routine outpatient access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an acute Dublin teaching hospital [Masters dissertation]. Dublin: Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

  20. Byrne SC, Barrett B, Bhatia R (2015) The impact of diagnostic imaging wait times on the prognosis of lung cancer. Can Assoc Radiol J 66(1):53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Flamm M, Fritsch G, Hysek M, Klausner S, Entacher K, Panisch S, Soennichsen AC (2013) Quality improvement in preoperative assessment by implementation of an electronic decision support tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20(e1):e91–e96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thrall JH (2014) Appropriateness and imaging utilization: “computerized provider order entry and decision support”. Acad Radiol 21(9):1083–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Republic of Ireland

    John P. Hynes & M. Rochford

  2. Department of Radiology, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Republic of Ireland

    K. Hunter

Authors
  1. John P. Hynes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Rochford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Hynes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hynes, J.P., Hunter, K. & Rochford, M. Utilization and appropriateness in cervical spine trauma imaging: implementation of clinical decision support criteria. Ir J Med Sci 189, 333–336 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02059-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02059-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation