Use of a novel corrective device for correction of deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), with an incidence of 3%, is a common deformity. Correction of severe curvature of the deformity has attracted much investigation to achieve safe, reproducible results. We present our experience with a novel device for the correction of deformities across a spectrum of curve types, the rod link reducer. This system allows direct visualization of a mass derotation to achieve deformity correction.
Prospective cohort study of patients with severe AIS treated in our institution during 2017 with major TL/L curves. Pre- and postoperative Cobb angles and coronal balance; operative time; and estimated blood loss, fusion levels, and screw density were recorded. Our results were split between those with a Lenke A/B classification and Lenke C, with a goal of correction of curve in the former and achieving good coronal balance with a preservation of distal motion segments in the latter.
There were 31 patients enrolled in our series. Within the Lenke A/B group, there were 18 patients, achieving a mean correction of 56% (SD 10%) and a correction of a mean coronal balance of 14.5 mm (SD 12.5 mm) of C7 from the CSVL to 10.9 mm (SD 10.6 mm). Our screw density was 1.3 screws (SD 0.1) per vertebrae fused. Our operative time was 185 min (SD 38 min). Average recorded blood loss was 721 ml (SD 289). In our Lenke C cohort, preoperative and postoperative mean Cobb angles (SD) were 73.3 (13.4) and 33.8 (11.9), respectively, with an average correction of 54% (SD 11%). The mean (SD) operative time was 03:35 (SD 00:35). Fusion levels were over a mean of 12.1 (SD 1.7) vertebrae, with a screw density of 1.3 (SD 0.1) per level. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 829 ml (SD 355). No patient received an allogenic blood transfusion. There were no adverse neurological events in this patient cohort.
The link rod system allows for excellent correction of spinal deformity and a short operative time.
KeywordsAIS Novel device Scoliosis
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction, and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Two authors report grants from Globus Medical outside the submitted work, as contributors to the Research Fund at our institution. Globus Medical manufactured the Link Rod System. Other authors have no disclosures to make.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained before initiation of this study.
Not required. Only general non-identifiable data on a series of patients is included in this work.
- 3.Liljenqvist U et al (2001) Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg 67(2):157–163Google Scholar
- 8.Senkoylu A, Cetinkaya M (2017) Correction manoeuvres in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities. EFORT Open Rev 2(5):135–140Google Scholar
- 12.Martin CT et al (2014) Increasing hospital charges for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the United States. Spine. 39(20):1676–1682Google Scholar
- 13.Jaquith BP et al (2012) Screws versus hooks: implant cost and deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 6(2):137–143Google Scholar
- 14.Halanski MA, Cassidy JA (2013) Do multilevel Ponte osteotomies in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis surgery improve curve correction and restore thoracic kyphosis? Clin Spine Surg 26(5):252–255Google Scholar
- 15.Larson AN et al (2016) What would be the annual cost savings if fewer screws were used in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatment in the US? J Neurosurg Spine 24(1):116–123Google Scholar
- 16.Wei X-z et al (2017) Key vertebral pedicle screw strategy for the correction of flexible Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study of a 5-year minimum radiographic follow-up. Spine. 42(16):1226–1232Google Scholar
- 17.Shen M et al (2017) Comparison of low density and high density pedicle screw instrumentation in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):336Google Scholar
- 18.Zhang H, Sucato D, Globus Medical Inc (2016) Spinal rod link reducer. U.S. Patent 9,408,641Google Scholar
- 19.Lenke LG (2005) Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect 54:537–542Google Scholar
- 21.Le Navéaux F et al (2015) Implant distribution in surgically instrumented Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does it affect curve correction? Spine 40(7):462–468Google Scholar
- 23.Westrick ER, Ward WT (2011) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year to 20-year evidence-based surgical results. J Pediatr Orthop 31:S61–S68Google Scholar
- 24.Wozniczka JK et al (2017) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis thoracic volume modeling: the effect of surgical correction. J Pediatr Orthop 37(8):e512–e518Google Scholar
- 25.Nohara A et al (2018) Intervertebral disc degeneration during postoperative follow-up more than 10 years after corrective surgery in idiopathic scoliosis: comparison between patients with and without surgery. Spine. 43(4):255–261Google Scholar
- 27.Larson AN et al (2014) Does higher anchor density result in increased curve correction and improved clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 39(7):571–578Google Scholar
- 28.Roach JW, Mehlman CT, Sanders JO (2011) Does the outcome of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery justify the rising cost of the procedures. J Pediatr Orthop 31:S77–S80Google Scholar
- 29.Hwang CJ et al (2011) Minimum 5-year follow-up results of skipped pedicle screw fixation for flexible idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 15(2):146–150Google Scholar
- 30.Li J et al (2016) Key-vertebral screws strategy for main thoracic curve correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg 29(8):E434–E441Google Scholar
- 37.Göçen S et al (1998) Evaluation of computed tomographic methods to measure vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an intraobserver and interobserver analysis. J Spinal Disord 11(3):210-214Google Scholar