Skip to main content

ICORG 06-35: a prospective evaluation of PET-CT scan in patients with non-operable or non-resectable non-small cell lung cancer treated by radical 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: a phase II study



Radiotherapy (RT) is a key treatment modality in the curative treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Incorrect definition of the gross, or clinical, target volume is a common source of error which can lead to a reduced probability of tumour control.


This was a pilot and a phase II study. The pilot evaluated the technical feasibility of integrating positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) fusion. The primary outcome of the phase II study was to evaluate the safety of PET-CT scan–based RT by evaluating the rate of loco-regional recurrence outside the PET-CT planning target volume (PTV) but within conventional 3-D PTV.


Patients underwent standard post-treatment follow-up, including repeated three monthly CT scans of the thorax. In case of loco-regional recurrence, three categories were considered, with only extra-PET scan PTV and intra-CT scan PTV recurrences considered as a failure. Our hypothesis was that the rate of these events would be < 10%.


Twelve patients were recruited; the study closed early due to poor recruitment. The primary endpoint of the pilot was met; it was feasible to deliver a PET-CT-based plan to ≥ 60% of patients. Two patients had intra-PET scan PTV recurrences, six had extra-PET scan PTV and extra-CT, and three patients had both. Another patient had extra-PET scan PTV and extra-CT as well as extra-PET scan PTV and intra-CT scan PTV recurrence.

Conclusion/advances in knowledge

PET-based planning has the potential to reduce radiation treatment volumes because of the avoidance of mediastinal lymph nodes that are PET negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. Levi F, Lucchini F, La Vecchia C, Negri E (1999) Trends in mortality from cancer in the European Union, 1955-94. Lancet (London, England). 354(9180):742–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, Feb 2014. Available from:

  3. Dogan N, Leybovich LB, Sethi A, Emami B (2002) Improvement of dose distributions in abutment regions of intensity modulated radiation therapy and electron fields. Med Phys 29(1):38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Kutcher GJ, Fuks Z (1998) Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and dose escalation: where do we stand? Semin Radiat Oncol 8(2):107–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkins DS, Conrad EU 3rd, Butrynski JE, Schuetze SM, Eary JF (2009) [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults. Cancer. 115(15):3519–3525

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ling CC, Humm J, Larson S, Amols H, Fuks Z, Leibel S, Koutcher JA (2000) Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(3):551–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dwamena BA, Sonnad SS, Angobaldo JO, Wahl RL (1999) Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: mediastinal staging in the 1990s--meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT. Radiology. 213(2):530–536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK (2001) Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. Jama. 285(7):914–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerfolio RJ, Ojha B, Mukherjee S, Pask AH, Bass CS, Katholi CR (2003) Positron emission tomography scanning with 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose as a predictor of response of neoadjuvant treatment for non-small cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125(4):938–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hicks RJ, Mac Manus MP, Matthews JP, Hogg A, Binns D, Rischin D, Ball DL, Peters LJ (2004) Early FDG-PET imaging after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: inflammatory changes in normal tissues correlate with tumor response and do not confound therapeutic response evaluation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(2):412–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mac Manus MP, Hicks RJ, Matthews JP, McKenzie A, Rischin D, Salminen EK, Ball DL (2003) Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1285–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, Kamel EM, Korom S, Seifert B, von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC (2003) Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med 348(25):2500–2507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, van den Bergh JH, Schreurs AJ, Stallaert RA et al (2002) Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) 359(9315):1388–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mac Manus MP, Wong K, Hicks RJ, Matthews JP, Wirth A, Ball DL (2002) Early mortality after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of PET-staged and conventionally staged cohorts treated at a large tertiary referral center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52(2):351–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mac Manus MP, Hicks RJ, Ball DL, Kalff V, Matthews JP, Salminen E, Khaw P, Wirth A, Rischin D, McKenzie A (2001) F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography staging in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: powerful correlation with survival and high impact on treatment. Cancer. 92(4):886–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kepka L, Socha J (2015) PET-CT use and the occurrence of elective nodal failure in involved field radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol 115(2):151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pu AT, Harrison AS, Robertson JM, Hayman JA, Martel MK et al (1997) The toxicity of elective nodal irradiation in the definitive treatment of non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39(abst 2):196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marks LB, Prosnitz LR (1999) Assessing the impact of elective regional radiotherapy on survival. Cancer J Sci Am 5(2):92–100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenzweig KE, Fox JL, Yorke E, Amols H, Jackson A, Rusch V, Kris MG, Ling CC, Leibel SA (2005) Results of a phase I dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 103(10):2118–2127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenzweig KE, Sura S, Jackson A, Yorke E (2007) Involved-field radiation therapy for inoperable non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(35):5557–5561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Emami B, Mirkovic N, Scott C, Byhardt R, Graham MV, James Andras E, John M, Herskovic A, Urtasun R, Asbell SO, Perez CA, Cox J (2003) The impact of regional nodal radiotherapy (dose/volume) on regional progression and survival in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of RTOG data. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 41(2):207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeremic B, Shibamoto Y, Acimovic L, Milisavljevic S (1997) Hyperfractionated radiotherapy alone for clinical stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38(3):521–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. MacManus M, Nestle U, Rosenzweig KE, Carrio I, Messa C, Belohlavek O, Danna M, Inoue T, Deniaud-Alexandre E, Schipani S, Watanabe N, Dondi M, Jeremic B (2009) Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006-2007. Radiother Oncol 91(1):85–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Messa C, Di Muzio N, Picchio M, Gilardi MC, Bettinardi V, Fazio F (2006) PET/CT and radiotherapy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 50(1):4–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deniaud-Alexandre E, Touboul E, Lerouge D, Grahek D, Foulquier JN, Petegnief Y, Grès B, el Balaa H, Keraudy K, Kerrou K, Montravers F, Milleron B, Lebeau B, Talbot JN (2005) Impact of computed tomography and 18F-deoxyglucose coincidence detection emission tomography image fusion for optimization of conformal radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(5):1432–1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Everitt S, Herschtal A, Callahan J, Plumridge N, Ball D, Kron T, Schneider-Kolsky M, Binns D, Hicks RJ, MacManus M (2010) High rates of tumor growth and disease progression detected on serial pretreatment fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 116(21):5030–5037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Ruysscher D, Nestle U, Jeraj R, Macmanus M (2012) PET scans in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 75(2):141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Graeter TP, Hellwig D, Hoffmann K, Ukena D, Kirsch CM, Schafers HJ (2003) Mediastinal lymph node staging in suspected lung cancer: comparison of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and mediastinoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 75(1):231–235 discussion 5-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hellwig D, Ukena D, Paulsen F, Bamberg M, Kirsch CM (2001) Meta-analysis of the efficacy of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in lung tumors. Basis for discussion of the German Consensus Conference on PET in Oncology 2000. Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) 55(8):367–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sattler B, Lee JA, Lonsdale M, Coche E (2010) PET/CT (and CT) instrumentation, image reconstruction and data transfer for radiotherapy planning. Radiother Oncol 96(3):288–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weber WA, Dietlein M, Hellwig D, Kirsch CM, Schicha H, Schwaiger M (2003) PET with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Nuklearmedizin 42(4):135–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Grgic A, Nestle U, Schaefer-Schuler A, Kremp S, Kirsch CM, Hellwig D (2009) FDG-PET-based radiotherapy planning in lung cancer: optimum breathing protocol and patient positioning--an intraindividual comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(1):103–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, Larson SM, Squire OD et al (2003) Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer by respiratory correlated dynamic PET: methodology and comparison with respiratory gated PET. J Nucl Med 44(10):1644–1648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nestle U, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A, Sebastian-Welsch C, Hellwig D, Rube C et al (2005) Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 46(8):1342–1348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The Health Research Board

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karla A. Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest


Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K.A., Rangaswamy, G., Lavan, N.A. et al. ICORG 06-35: a prospective evaluation of PET-CT scan in patients with non-operable or non-resectable non-small cell lung cancer treated by radical 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: a phase II study. Ir J Med Sci 188, 1155–1161 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: