Skip to main content

Ireland’s Assisted Decision Making Capacity Act—the potential for unintended effects in critical emergencies: a cross-sectional study of Advanced Paramedic decision making

Abstract

Objective

Irish legislation on Advance Healthcare Directives (Assisted Decision Making Capacity Act 2015, ADMC) proposes to change the basis of decision making from acting in the patient’s best interests to following the expressed will and intentions of the patient. Refusal of life-saving care can occur, without sound reasons. The implications for care in life-threatening emergencies have not been explored among clinicians.

Design

An anonymous questionnaire survey of Advanced Paramedics (AP) covering awareness of the legislation, attitudes to and experience of refusal of care and potential actions in emergency scenarios now and if the legislation were in force. The scenarios covered end-of-life and deliberate self-harm situations potentially requiring resuscitation.

Setting

All 482 graduates of the Advanced Paramedic Training Programme were invited to take part.

Results

Overall, 85/389 (21.9%) valid contacts responded, with demographic characteristics similar to the overall population. Attitudes ranged from highly positive to highly negative in relation to the potential impact of the legislation on professional and operational responsibilities. Respondents described marked changes in whether they would offer resuscitation if the ADMC were in place.

Conclusion

Irish legislation which changes the traditional basis of medical practice away from the best interests of the patient may affect the resuscitation practices of Advanced Paramedics in life-threatening situations. It has significant implications for medical education, professional practice and clinician-patient interactions. This legislation and similar planned legislation may have implications for other EU jurisdictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Gillon R (1994) Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 309:184–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2012) Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Good Medical Practice (2013) General medical council, London. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/good-medical-practice---english-1215_pdf-51527435.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  4. Medical professionalism project (2002) Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician’s charter. Lancet 359:520–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Assisted Decision Making (Capacity) (2015) Act, 2015. Oireachtas. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/64/enacted/en/html. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  6. ADMC 2015: how will it work? Oireachtas Library and Research Service, 2017. https://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/media/housesoftheoireachtas/libraryresearch/lrsnotes/Assisted-Decision-Making-(Capacity)-Act-2015.pdf

  7. Guide to Professional Conduct and Ethics, 8th ed. Medical Council of Ireland, Dublin (2016) https://www.medicalcouncil.ie/News-and-Publications/Reports/Guide-to-Professional-Conduct-Ethics-8th-Edition.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  8. Code of Professional Conduct (2008). Pre-Hospital Emergency Care Council. http://www.phecit.ie/Images/PHECC/Code%20of%20Professional%20Conduct%20and%20Ethics.pdf

  9. Knight S, Olsen L, Cook L, Mann N, Cornelli H, Dean J (2003) Against all advice: an analysis of out-of-hospital refusals of care. Ann Emerg Med 42:689–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Waldron R, Finalle C, Tsang J, Lesser M, Mogelof D (2012) Effect of gender on prehospital refusal of medical aid. J Emerg Med 43:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marco C, Brenner J, Kraus C, McGrath N, Derse A (2017) ACEP ethics committee. Refusal of emergency medical treatment: case studies and ethical foundations. Ann Emerg Med 70:696–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Standards of Conduct, Performance and ethics (2008) Health Care Professions Council, London. https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-conduct-performance-and-ethics/. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  13. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Advanced Paramedics (2017) Ed. pre-hospital emergency care council, Naas, 2017. http://www.phecit.ie/PHECC/Clinical_resources/Clinical_practice_guidelines/2017_edition_CPGs/PHECC/Clinical_Resources/Clinical_Practice_Guidelines__CPGs_/2017_edition_CPGs.aspx?hkey=6fe87354-a1f5-4818-a098-7767551a68cf. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  14. National Suicide Research Foundation, 2019. https://www.nsrf.ie/statistics/suicide/

  15. Annual Report 2017, National Self Harm Registry Ireland National Suicide Research Foundation, 2018

  16. Mental Capacity Act (2005) Code of practice. Department of Constitutional Affairs, The Stationery Office, London, 2007. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dca.gov.uk/legal-policy/mentalcapacity/mca-cp.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  17. Advance decisions and proxy decision making in medical treatment and research. Guidance from the BMA’s medical ethics department. British Medical Association 2007

  18. Mental Health Reform (2017). Briefing Note on Mental Health (Amendment) Bill 2017 https://www.mentalhealthreform.ie/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Briefing-note-on-the-Mental-Health Amendment-Bill-2017.pdf

  19. Oireachtas (2017). Mental Health (Amendment) Bill https://beta.oireachtas.ie/en/bills/bill/2017/23/

  20. European Charter of Medical Ethics (2011). CEOM. http://www.ceom-ecmo.eu/sites/default/files/documents/en-european_medical_ethics_charter-adopted_in_kos.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard Bury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

All study participants provided informed consent.

Data sharing

No additional data available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article summary—strengths and limitations of the study

• Ireland is changing its laws to require the patient’s ‘will and preferences’ to dictate care instead of the clinician’s perceptions of the patient’s ‘best interests’.

• Refusal of care can occur, even if this leads to death.

• First research to explore the impact of these changes—survey with low response rate but key provider group.

• Advanced Paramedics report significant potential changes in resuscitation practice, in key scenarios.

• There may be implications for practice elsewhere in the EU.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 106 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bury, G., Thompson, A., Tobin, H. et al. Ireland’s Assisted Decision Making Capacity Act—the potential for unintended effects in critical emergencies: a cross-sectional study of Advanced Paramedic decision making. Ir J Med Sci 188, 1143–1148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-01994-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-01994-w

Keywords