Skip to main content
Log in

Child Art Psychotherapy in CAMHS in Ireland—a parent satisfaction study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate parent satisfaction with the Vasarhelyi method of Child Art Psychotherapy offered at two Child and Adolescent Mental Health teams by postal survey using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, and by performing a qualitative interview.

Methods

Parents of 29 children who attended Child Art Psychotherapy over the previous 4 years were invited to participate—they were sent the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire and invited to attend for an interview about Child Art Psychotherapy. The postal survey was followed up by a telephone call to complete missing surveys. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire has a 4-point Likert scale with a minimum score of 8 and maximum score (highest satisfaction) of 32.

Results

Fourteen Client Satisfaction questionnaires were returned indicating a response rate of 48%. The mean age of the children who attended CAP was 10.84 years. The mean CSQ-8 score was 25.6 (95% CI 22.0–29.3) with a range of 8 to 32. Eighty-five percent of parents indicated that they were satisfied on all questions regarding the service of CAP their child received. One of 29 parents attended for interview and 4 themes were identified in the interview: (1) the importance of the child’s opinion, (2) behavioural change occurred during and after CAP, (3) the parent would recommend CAP to others, and (4) parental expectations of therapy and level of engagement.

Conclusion

Parents are satisfied with the Vasarhelyi method of Child Art Psychotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alavinezhad R, Mousavi M, Sohrabi N (2014) Effects of art therapy on anger and self-esteem in aggressive children. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 113:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Attkinson, C.C., Greenfield, T.K. (1999). The UCSF client satisfaction scales: 1. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment (2nd ed., pp. 1333–1346). Mahvah, NJ: Erlbaum

  3. Cortina MA, Fazel M (2015) The Art Room: an evaluation of a targeted school-based group intervention for students with emotional and behavioural difficulties. Arts Psychother 42:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2014.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coşkunlu A, Tanıl E, Coffey A, Büyüktaşkın D, Mulligan A (2017) The Vasarhelyi method of child art psychotherapy: an adjunctive treatment in childhood depression. Psychoanal Psychother. https://doi.org/10.1080/02668734.2017.1334150 (online Jun 2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eaton LG, Doherty KL, Widrick RM (2007) A review of research and methods used to establish art therapy as an effective treatment method for traumatized children. Arts Psychother 34:256–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerber GJ, Prince PN. (1999). Measuring Client Satisfaction With Assertive Community Treatment Psychiatric Services 50(4): 546-550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guidance for commissioners of child and adolescent mental health services - Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health. October 2013 available at www.jcpmh.info/wp-content/uploads/jcpmh-camhs-guide.pdf, Accessed 17th February 2016

  8. Hashemian P, Jarahi L (2014) Effect of painting therapy on aggression in educable intellectually disabled students. Psychology, 5:2058–2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hogan S (2009) The art therapy continuum: a useful tool for envisaging the diversity of practice in British art therapy. International Journal of Art Therapy 14(1):29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, available at http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/news/working-with-under-18-year-olds-guidance-for-commission, accessed 18th February 2016

  11. Kazdin AE (1996) Dropping out of child psychotherapy: issues for research and implications for practice. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 1(1):133–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khadar MG, Babapour J, Sabourimoghaddam H (2013) The effect of art therapy based on painting therapy in reducing symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in elementary school boys. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 84:1872–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD (1979) Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann 2:197–207 Instrument reproduced with permission of C. Clifford Attkisson

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malchoidi C A. (2003) Handbook of art therapy. 2003 Guildford Press, New York

  15. McGovern M, Byrne A, McCormack M, Mulligan A (2016) The Vasarhelyi Method of Child Art Psychotherapy in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: a stakeholder survey of clinical supervisors. Ir J Psychol Med:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2016.29

  16. McNicholas F, Reulbach U, Hanrahan SO, Sakar M (2016) Are parents and children satisfied with CAMHS? Ir J Psychol Med 33(3):143–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Depression in children and young people: identification and management Clinical guideline [CG28], March 2015 Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG28/chapter/1-Recommendations#steps-4-and-5-moderate-to-severe-depression

  18. Oetzel KB, Scherer DG (2003) Therapeutic engagement with adolescents in psychotherapy. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train 40(3):215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds MW, Nabors L, Quinlan A (2000) The effectiveness of art therapy: does it work? Art Therapy: J Am Art Therapy Assoc 17(3):207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roos J, Werbart A (2013) Therapist and relationship factors influencing dropout from individual psychotherapy: a literature review. Psychother Res: J Soc Psychother Res 23(4):394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saba L, Byrne A, Mulligan A (2016) Child art psychotherapy in CAMHS: which cases are referred and which cases drop out? Springerplus 5(1):1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slayton SC, D’archer J, Kaplan F (2010) Outcome studies on the efficacy of art therapy: a review of findings. Art Ther J Am Art Ther Assoc 27(3):108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith D, Roche E, O’Loughlin K, Brennan D, Madigan K, Lyne J, Feeney L, O’Donoghue B. (2014) Satisfaction with services following voluntary and involuntary admission, Journal of Mental Health, 23:1, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2013.841864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vasarhelyi V. (1981). What happened on Ben Nevis? Psychotherapy with Pictorial Means and the Time Aspect of Pictorial Thinking. Special Study-Goldsmith’s College, 27–45

  25. Waller D (2006) Art therapy for children: how it leads to change. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 11(2):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wampold BE (2015) How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry 14:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Winnicott, D. (1971). Therapeutic consultations in child psychiatry. New York: Basic Books, 1971b, p. 3

  28. Working with under 18 year olds: Guidance for Commissioners, IAPT service providers and those working in IAPT services. Available at http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/about-iapt, Accessed 28 Sept 2017

Download references

Funding

We would like to acknowledge the European Erasmus fund, which funded the placement of Ezgi Tanıl and Aynur Coşkunlu in Ireland, allowing Ezgi Tanıl and Aynur Coşkunlu to perform this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aisling Mulligan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr Aisling Mulligan is the UCD Academic Lead to the Child Art Psychotherapy Masters Programme run jointly by the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and University College Dublin.

Additional information

Ezgi Tanıl and Aynur Coşkunlu are joint first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanıl, E., Coşkunlu, A. & Mulligan, A. Child Art Psychotherapy in CAMHS in Ireland—a parent satisfaction study. Ir J Med Sci 187, 987–992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1786-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1786-1

Keywords

Navigation