Skip to main content
Log in

Emerging trends in hospitalisation for fragility fractures in Ireland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We analysed hospital admissions and bed occupancy for fragility fractures in Ireland over a 15-year period to assess fracture admission trends and to project admissions over the next three decades.

Methods

We used the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) scheme to extract data on fracture admissions to Irish hospitals between 2000 and 2014 inclusive. We calculated absolute numbers and age-standardised rates of hospitalisations for men and women ≥ 50 years for each osteoporotic-type fracture. We projected fracture numbers and bed days using these trends, and associated costs to 2046 based on 2014 rates.

Results

The absolute number of all fragility fracture admissions increased by 30% between 2000 and 2014, for both men (40%) and women (27%). In-patient bed days for osteoporotic fractures have increased by 51% in the same period. Hip fractures dominated admissions, accounting for 36.5% of all admissions and almost half (46.7%) of all bed days. Age-standardised rates of hip fracture admission decreased significantly (p < 0.001) in women, but not in men, while rates of non-hip osteoporotic fracture admissions have not changed significantly for men or women. Hospitalisations for all osteoporotic fractures are projected to increase by 150% to 31,605 in 2046, 58% of whom will be 80 years or older.

Conclusions

There has been a significant increase in the number of fracture admissions in Irish men and women over the past 15 years. This is projected to increase further over the next three decades which will place a significant burden on the Irish healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B, Kanis JA (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. Arch Osteoporos 8:136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett-Connor E (1995) The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture. Am J Med 98(2):3S–8S. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(05)80037-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1702-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet (London, England) 359(9319):1761–1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McGowan B, Casey MC, Silke C, Whelan B, Bennett K (2013) Hospitalisations for fracture and associated costs between 2000 and 2009 in Ireland: a trend analysis. Osteoporos Int 24(3):849–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2032-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations Population Division (n.d.) World population prospects - population division - United Nations https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Probabilistic/Population/

  7. Healthcare Pricing Office Activity in Acute Public Hospitals in Ireland (2015) Annu Rep 2016. http://www.hpo.ie/latest_hipe_nprs_reports/HIPE_2015/HIPE_Report_2015.pdf

  8. https://www.hiqa.ie/areas-we-work/health-information/data-collections/health-atlas-ireland

  9. Population and Labour Force Projections 2016–2046 - CSO - Central Statistics Office (n.d.) http://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/population/populationandlabourforceprojections2016-2046/

  10. cso.ie. Consumer Price Index August 2016 - CSO - Central Statistics Office (n.d.) http://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/er/cpi/consumerpriceindexaugust2016/

  11. Mann E, Icks A, Haastert B, Meyer G (2008) Hip fracture incidence in the elderly in Austria: an epidemiological study covering the years 1994 to 2006. BMC Geriatr 8(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernández JL, Olmos JM, Alonso MA, González-Fernández CR, Martínez J, Pajarón M, Llorca J, González-Macías J (2006) Trend in hip fracture epidemiology over a 14-year period in a Spanish population. Osteoporos Int 17(3):464–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0008-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wildner M, Clark DE (2001) Hip fracture incidence in East and West germany: reassessement ten years after unification. Osteoporos Int 12(2):136–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995-2004: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 19(8):1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0534-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lippuner K, Popp AW, Schwab P, Gitlin M, Schaufler T, Senn C, Perrelet R (2011) Fracture hospitalizations between years 2000 and 2007 in Switzerland: a trend analysis. Osteoporos Int 22(9):2487–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1487-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Jonsson BY, Mogensen B, Gudmundsson EF, Gudnason V et al (2014) Epidemiology of fractures in Iceland and secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures 1989-2008. Osteoporos Int 25(1):211–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2422-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Korhonen N, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Palvanen M, Kannus P (2013) Continuous decline in incidence of hip fracture: nationwide statistics from Finland between 1970 and 2010. Osteoporos Int 24(5):1599–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2190-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyritis GP, Rizou S, Galanos A, Makras P (2013) Incidence of hip fractures in Greece during a 30-year period: 1977-2007. Osteoporos Int 24:1579–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2154-z.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Velde RY, Wyers CE, Curtis EM, Geusens PPMM, van den Bergh JPW, de Vries F, Cooper C, van Staa TP, Harvey NC (2016) Secular trends in fracture incidence in the UK between 1990 and 2012. Osteoporos Int 27(11):3197–3206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3650-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sullivan KJ, Husak LE, Altebarmakian M, Brox WT (2016) Demographic factors in hip fracture incidence and mortality rates in California, 2000-2011. J Orthop Surg Res 11(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0332-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Giannini S, Sella S, Rossini M, Braghin D, Gatti D, Teresa M, Amabile A, Fusaro M, Frigo A, Sergi G, Lovato R, Nobile M, Fabris FAS (2016) Declining trends in the incidence of hip fractures in people aged 65 years or over in years 2000–2011. Eur J Intern Med 35:60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Concin H, Brozek W, Benedetto K-P, Häfele H, Kopf J, Bärenzung T, Schnetzer R, Schenk C, Stimpfl E, Waheed-Hutter U, Ulmer H, Rapp K, Zwettler E, Nagel G (2016) Hip fracture incidence 2003–2013 and projected cases until 2050 in Austria: a population-based study. Int J Public Health 61(9):1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0878-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Karampampa K, Ahlbom A, Michaëlsson K, Andersson T, Drefahl S, Modig K (2015) Declining incidence trends for hip fractures have not been accompanied by improvements in lifetime risk or post-fracture survival—a nationwide study of the Swedish population 60 years and older. Bone 78:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nilson F, Moniruzzaman S, Gustavsson J, Andersson R (2013) Trends in hip fracture incidence rates among the elderly in Sweden 1987-2009. J Public Health (Oxf) 35(1):125–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosengren BE, Ahlborg HG, Mellström D, Nilsson J-Å, Björk J, Karlsson MK (2012) Secular trends in Swedish hip fractures 1987-2002: birth cohort and period effects. Epidemiology 23(4):623–630. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318256982a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abrahamsen B, Vestergaard P (2010) Declining incidence of hip fractures and the extent of use of anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark 1997-2006. Osteoporos Int 21(3):373–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0957-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Omsland TK, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Center JR, Emaus N, Tell GS, Schei B, Tverdal A, Gjesdal CG, Grimnes G, Forsmo S, Eisman JA, Søgaard AJ (2012) Hip fractures in Norway 1999-2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates: a NOREPOS study. Eur J Epidemiol 27(10):807–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9711-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stevens JA, Rudd RA (2013) The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos Int 24(10):2725–2728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2375-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S, Lagacé C, Walsh P, Bancej C et al (2009) Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA 302(8):883–889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Alves SM, Castiglione D, Oliveira CM, de Sousa B, Pina MF (2014) Age–period–cohort effects in the incidence of hip fractures: political and economic events are coincident with changes in risk. Osteoporos Int 25(2):711–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2483-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Evans JG, Seagroatt V, Goldacre MJ (1997) Secular trends in proximal femoral fracture, Oxford record linkage study area and England 1968-86. J Epidemiol Community Health 51(4):424–429. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.51.4.424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Samelson EJ, Zhang Y, Kiel DP, Hannan MT, Felson DT (2002) Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: age-specific incidence rates in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 92(5):858–862. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.5.858

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosengren BE, Björk J, Cooper C, Abrahamsen B (2017) Recent hip fracture trends in Sweden and Denmark with age-period-cohort effects. Osteoporos Int 28(1):139–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3768-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Castel H, Bonneh DY, Sherf M, Liel Y (2001) Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures. Osteoporos Int 12(7):559–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McGowan B, Bennett K (2012) Adherence with antiosteoporosis medications: a primary-care study. Prescriber 23(1-2):34–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nikkel LE, Fox EJ, Black KP, Davis C, Andersen L, Hollenbeak CS (2012) Impact of comorbidities on hospitalization costs following hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Health Service Reports - The Irish Hospital Consultants Association (n.d.) http://www.ihca.ie/news/paging.1.443.html (accessed December 11, 2017).

  38. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (n.d.) CDC Compendium of Effective Fall Interventions: What Works for Community-Dwelling Older Adults, 3rd Edition | Home and Recreational Safety | CDC Injury Center http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/falls/compendium.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

This Article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by any of the authors. For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 3 Distribution of the ICD – 10 codes used to identify typical and atypical osteoporotic type fractures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, M.A., McGowan, B., McKenna, M.J. et al. Emerging trends in hospitalisation for fragility fractures in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 187, 601–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1743-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1743-z

Keywords

Navigation