Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients’ contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

With high incidence of haemorrhoidal disease and significant complication rates of traditional haemorrhoidectomy procedures, transanal haemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy (THD) emerges as a minimally invasive procedure with superior results. However, it is crucial that effectiveness of results and patient satisfaction be gauged based on post-operative experience, symptomology and recurrence.

Aim

Our aim is to provide a long-term analysis of efficacy and patient’s satisfaction for the procedure, for the largest patient population, in correlation to presenting symptoms and degree of haemorrhoids.

Method

A prospective study was conducted for all the patients (324) that underwent THD between 2011 and 2016 in Naas General Hospital. The assessment was done for postoperative complications, symptoms pre- and postoperatively and patients’ satisfaction rating. Clinical follow-up was done after 6 weeks and long-term follow-up by standardized questionnaire filled by telephonic clinic.

Results

Of the 324 patients who underwent surgery, 256 (79.0%) participated in the study. There were 119 (46.5%) males and 137 (53.5%) females. The average age of patients was 48.40 years (17–82). Two hundred and fifteen (84.0%) patients had no recurrence. Forty-one (16.0%) had recurrence requiring further treatment. There was statistically significant higher recurrence in patients with grade 3 and 4 haemorrhoids and per-rectal bleeding (p < 0.05) while there was no statistically significant recurrence for age, gender, sedentary lifestyle and constipation/pruritus. Two hundred and twenty-four (87.5%) patients were completely satisfied from the procedure and highly recommend the procedure.

Conclusion

THD is a comparably pain-free procedure with improved results that prides in higher long-term satisfaction, minimal recurrence and fewer complications, in comparison to other surgical modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aigner F, Bodner G, Gruber H, Conrad F, Fritsch H, Margreiter R et al (2006) The vascular nature of hemorrhoids. J Gastrointest Surg 10(7):1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goligher J, Leacock A, Brossy JJ (1955) The surgical anatomy of the anal canal. Br J Surg 43(177):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.18004317707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pucher PH, Qurashi M, Howell AM, Faiz O, Ziprin P, Darzi A, Sodergren MH (2015) Development and validation of a symptom-based severity score for haemorrhoidal disease: the Sodergren score. Colorectal Dis 17(7):612–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12903

  4. Likert RA (1932) Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol

  5. Cintron JR, Abcarian H (2007) Benign anorectal: hemorrhoids. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, pp 156–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36374-5_11

  6. Lohsiriwat V (2012) Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol 18(17):2009–2017. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2009

  7. Han W, Wang Z, Zhao B, Yang X, Wang D, Wang J, et al. Pathologic change of elastic fibers with difference of microvessel density and expression of angiogenesis-related proteins in internal hemorrhoid tissues. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi= Chinese J Gastrointest Surg 2005;8(1):56–59

  8. Chung YC, Hou YC, Pan AH (2004) Endoglin (CD105) expression in the development of haemorrhoids. Eur J Clin Investig 34(2):107–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2004.01305.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aigner F, Gruber H, Conrad F, Eder J, Wedel T, Zelger B, Engelhardt V, Lametschwandtner A, Wienert V, Böhler U, Margreiter R, Fritsch H (2009) Revised morphology and hemodynamics of the anorectal vascular plexus: impact on the course of hemorrhoidal disease. Int J Color Dis 24(1):105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0572-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien P-A (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 137(3):337–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9206):782–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08362-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Denis J, Dubois N, Ganansia R, du Puy-Montbrun T, Lemarchand N. Hemorrhoidectomy: Hospital Leopold Bellan procedure. Int Surg 1988;74(3):152–153

  13. KW E, Seow-Choen F, Goh H (1994) Comparison of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 81(2):308–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, Weinstein MA (2001) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 182(5):515–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00759-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1837–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0679-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto G (2011) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15(2):191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0689-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D (2000) Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 355(9206):810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02208-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pessaux P, Lermite E, Tuech J-J, Brehant O, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2004) Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199(5):824–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.04.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Filingeri V, Gravante G (2005) Pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema of the neck after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Tech Coloproctol 9(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-005-0202-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bönner C, Prohm P, Störkel S (2001) Fournier gangrene as a rare complication after stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Case report and review of the literature. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 72(12):1464–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001040170012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda TA (1995) Novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90(4):610–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Giordano P, Tomasi I, Pascariello A, Mills E, Elahi S (2014) Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids. Color Dis 16(5):373–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Atallah S, Maharaja G, Martin-Perez B, Burke J, Albert M, Larach S (2016) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD): a safe procedure for the anticoagulated patient? Tech Coloproctol 20(7):461–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1481-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Karin E, Avital S, Dotan I, Skornick Y, Greenberg R (2012) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Color Dis 14(1):111–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02541.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pucher P, Sodergren M, Lord A, Darzi A, Ziprin P (2013) Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review. Color Dis 15(6):e284–ee94. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Festen S, Van Hoogstraten M, Van Geloven A, Gerhards M (2009) Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Color Dis 24(12):1401–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0803-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52(9):1665–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af50f4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Avital S, Inbar R, Karin E, Greenberg R (2012) Five-year follow-up of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Tech Coloproctol 16(1):61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0801-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilkerson P, Strbac M, Reece-Smith H, Middleton S (2009) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: long-term outcome and patient satisfaction. Color Dis 11(4):394–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01602.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hetzer F, Schäfer M, Demartines N, Clavien P (2001) Prospective assessment of the learning curve and safety of stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Swiss Surg 8(1):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Verre L, Rossi R, Gaggelli I, Di Bella C, Tirone A, Piccolomini A (2013) PPH versus THD: a comparison of two techniques for III and IV degree haemorrhoids. Personal experience. Minerva Chir 68(6):543–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sajid M, Parampalli U, Whitehouse P, Sains P, McFall M, Baig MA (2012) Systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0796-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Infantino A, Altomare D, Bottini C, Bonanno M, Mancini S (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Color Dis 14(2):205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02628.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qurat Ul Ain.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and consent from ethical committee was obtained.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ul Ain, Q., Bashir, Y. & Eguare, E. Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients’ contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study. Ir J Med Sci 187, 647–655 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1715-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1715-8

Keywords

Navigation