Abstract
Introduction
With high incidence of haemorrhoidal disease and significant complication rates of traditional haemorrhoidectomy procedures, transanal haemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy (THD) emerges as a minimally invasive procedure with superior results. However, it is crucial that effectiveness of results and patient satisfaction be gauged based on post-operative experience, symptomology and recurrence.
Aim
Our aim is to provide a long-term analysis of efficacy and patient’s satisfaction for the procedure, for the largest patient population, in correlation to presenting symptoms and degree of haemorrhoids.
Method
A prospective study was conducted for all the patients (324) that underwent THD between 2011 and 2016 in Naas General Hospital. The assessment was done for postoperative complications, symptoms pre- and postoperatively and patients’ satisfaction rating. Clinical follow-up was done after 6 weeks and long-term follow-up by standardized questionnaire filled by telephonic clinic.
Results
Of the 324 patients who underwent surgery, 256 (79.0%) participated in the study. There were 119 (46.5%) males and 137 (53.5%) females. The average age of patients was 48.40 years (17–82). Two hundred and fifteen (84.0%) patients had no recurrence. Forty-one (16.0%) had recurrence requiring further treatment. There was statistically significant higher recurrence in patients with grade 3 and 4 haemorrhoids and per-rectal bleeding (p < 0.05) while there was no statistically significant recurrence for age, gender, sedentary lifestyle and constipation/pruritus. Two hundred and twenty-four (87.5%) patients were completely satisfied from the procedure and highly recommend the procedure.
Conclusion
THD is a comparably pain-free procedure with improved results that prides in higher long-term satisfaction, minimal recurrence and fewer complications, in comparison to other surgical modalities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigner F, Bodner G, Gruber H, Conrad F, Fritsch H, Margreiter R et al (2006) The vascular nature of hemorrhoids. J Gastrointest Surg 10(7):1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.004
Goligher J, Leacock A, Brossy JJ (1955) The surgical anatomy of the anal canal. Br J Surg 43(177):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.18004317707
Pucher PH, Qurashi M, Howell AM, Faiz O, Ziprin P, Darzi A, Sodergren MH (2015) Development and validation of a symptom-based severity score for haemorrhoidal disease: the Sodergren score. Colorectal Dis 17(7):612–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12903
Likert RA (1932) Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol
Cintron JR, Abcarian H (2007) Benign anorectal: hemorrhoids. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, pp 156–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36374-5_11
Lohsiriwat V (2012) Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol 18(17):2009–2017. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2009
Han W, Wang Z, Zhao B, Yang X, Wang D, Wang J, et al. Pathologic change of elastic fibers with difference of microvessel density and expression of angiogenesis-related proteins in internal hemorrhoid tissues. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi= Chinese J Gastrointest Surg 2005;8(1):56–59
Chung YC, Hou YC, Pan AH (2004) Endoglin (CD105) expression in the development of haemorrhoids. Eur J Clin Investig 34(2):107–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2004.01305.x
Aigner F, Gruber H, Conrad F, Eder J, Wedel T, Zelger B, Engelhardt V, Lametschwandtner A, Wienert V, Böhler U, Margreiter R, Fritsch H (2009) Revised morphology and hemodynamics of the anorectal vascular plexus: impact on the course of hemorrhoidal disease. Int J Color Dis 24(1):105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0572-3
Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien P-A (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 137(3):337–340
Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9206):782–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08362-2
Denis J, Dubois N, Ganansia R, du Puy-Montbrun T, Lemarchand N. Hemorrhoidectomy: Hospital Leopold Bellan procedure. Int Surg 1988;74(3):152–153
KW E, Seow-Choen F, Goh H (1994) Comparison of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 81(2):308–310
Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, Weinstein MA (2001) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 182(5):515–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00759-0
Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1837–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0679-8
Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto G (2011) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15(2):191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0689-1
Molloy RG, Kingsmore D (2000) Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 355(9206):810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02208-X
Pessaux P, Lermite E, Tuech J-J, Brehant O, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2004) Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199(5):824–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.04.026
Filingeri V, Gravante G (2005) Pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema of the neck after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Tech Coloproctol 9(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-005-0202-9
Bönner C, Prohm P, Störkel S (2001) Fournier gangrene as a rare complication after stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Case report and review of the literature. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 72(12):1464–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001040170012
Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda TA (1995) Novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90(4):610–613
Giordano P, Tomasi I, Pascariello A, Mills E, Elahi S (2014) Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids. Color Dis 16(5):373–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12574
Atallah S, Maharaja G, Martin-Perez B, Burke J, Albert M, Larach S (2016) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD): a safe procedure for the anticoagulated patient? Tech Coloproctol 20(7):461–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1481-z
Karin E, Avital S, Dotan I, Skornick Y, Greenberg R (2012) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Color Dis 14(1):111–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02541.x
Pucher P, Sodergren M, Lord A, Darzi A, Ziprin P (2013) Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review. Color Dis 15(6):e284–ee94. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12205
Festen S, Van Hoogstraten M, Van Geloven A, Gerhards M (2009) Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Color Dis 24(12):1401–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0803-2
Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52(9):1665–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af50f4
Avital S, Inbar R, Karin E, Greenberg R (2012) Five-year follow-up of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Tech Coloproctol 16(1):61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0801-6
Wilkerson P, Strbac M, Reece-Smith H, Middleton S (2009) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: long-term outcome and patient satisfaction. Color Dis 11(4):394–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01602.x
Hetzer F, Schäfer M, Demartines N, Clavien P (2001) Prospective assessment of the learning curve and safety of stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Swiss Surg 8(1):31–36
Verre L, Rossi R, Gaggelli I, Di Bella C, Tirone A, Piccolomini A (2013) PPH versus THD: a comparison of two techniques for III and IV degree haemorrhoids. Personal experience. Minerva Chir 68(6):543–550
Sajid M, Parampalli U, Whitehouse P, Sains P, McFall M, Baig MA (2012) Systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0796-z
Infantino A, Altomare D, Bottini C, Bonanno M, Mancini S (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Color Dis 14(2):205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02628.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and consent from ethical committee was obtained.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ul Ain, Q., Bashir, Y. & Eguare, E. Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients’ contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study. Ir J Med Sci 187, 647–655 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1715-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1715-8