Skip to main content
Log in

Tinzaparin thromboprophylaxis prescribing practice after caesarean delivery 2009–2014

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

National guidelines have been developed to ensure correct dosing of tinzaparin for women delivered by caesarean delivery (CD) to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism.

Aims

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of implementation of national guidelines on thromboprophylaxis prescribing practice for women undergoing CD in a university maternity hospital.

Methods

Details of tinzaparin usage were obtained from the Hospital pharmacy for the years 2009–2014. Information on CD and pulmonary embolism (PE) were obtained from the Hospital’s annual clinical reports.

Results

Following guideline recommendations on weight-based tinzaparin for all women undergoing CD, the usage of syringes prefilled with tinzaparin 4500 IU increased from 526 to 8502 (P < 0.001) and usage of syringes prefilled with tinzaparin 10,000 IU increased from 36 to 910 (P < 0.001). Usage of syringes prefilled with tinzaparin 3500 IU decreased from 8216 in 2009 to 39 in 2014 (P < 0.001). During 2008–2010, there were two cases of PE after CD, both of whom received an inadequate dose of prophylactic tinzaparin. During 2011–2014 there were no cases of PE diagnosed after a total of 9427 CDs.

Conclusions

The development of national guidelines on thromboprophylaxis after CD was followed by a significant change in weight-based prescribing of tinzaparin. Following implementation, there have been no cases of PE after CD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P et al, editors, on behalf of MBRRACE-UK (2014). Saving lives, improving mothers’ care—lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–12. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford

  2. Greer IA (1999) Thrombosis in pregnancy: maternal and fetal issues. Lancet 353:1258–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mismettti P, Laporte S, Darmon JY et al (2001) Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery. Br J Surg 88:913–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greer IA, Nelson-Piercy C (2005) Low-molecular-weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood 106:401–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2009). Reducing the risk of thrombosis and embolism during pregnancy and the puerperium. Green-top Guideline 37a. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg37areducingriskthrombosis.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2016

  6. Kennedy C, O’Dwyer V, O’Kelly S et al (2012) Thromboprophylaxis for women undergoing caesarean section. Ir Med J 105:56–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2011) Obesity and pregnancy, Clinical Practice Guideline No. 2. Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin http://www.hse.ie/eng/about/Who/clinical/natclinprog/obsandgynaeprogramme/guideobesity.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2013) Venous thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy. Clinical practice guideline no. 20. Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin http://www.hse.ie/eng/about/Who/clinical/natclinprog/obsandgynaeprogramme/vte.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coombe Women Infants University Hospital (2015). Annual Clinical Report 2014. HSE Press, Dublin

  10. Lynch CM, Kearney R, Turner MJ (2003) Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106:10–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pai M, Lloyd NS, Cheng J et al (2013) Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci 8:1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M et al (2006) Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 108:1234–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grol R (2001). Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 39: II-46-II-54

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Maguire.

Ethics declarations

As a retrospective study of routinely gathered hospital pharmacy dispensing data, this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maguire, P.J., McGuire, M., Power, K.A. et al. Tinzaparin thromboprophylaxis prescribing practice after caesarean delivery 2009–2014. Ir J Med Sci 187, 123–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1619-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1619-7

Keywords

Navigation