Can chronic disease be managed through integrated care cost-effectively? Evidence from a systematic review
The increase in demand for integrated care models to manage chronic disease is a challenge for the Irish health system, which is traditionally organised around the acute hospital services. Implementing integrated care programmes requires significant investment, and thus, their economic impact requires consideration.
This paper updates the previous evidence on the cost-effectiveness of integrated care programmes to support the development of a cost-effective integrated care programme for chronic disease management.
A systematic review of economic evaluations of integrated care programmes for chronic diseases (respiratory, cardiovascular, diabetes and musculoskeletal diseases) was performed using methods guided by the principles of conducting systematic reviews. The evidence was combined and summarised using a narrative synthesis. A meta-analysis of the evidence was not performed due to the heterogeneity of interventions and associated outcomes.
Six studies met the inclusion criteria; no study considered an integrated model of care that dealt with more than one chronic illness. Four chronic conditions were examined: stroke, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and COPD. Three studies were full economic evaluations, and three were partial economic evaluations.
The economic evidence, examined within this review, suggests that integrated care programmes have the potential to be cost-effective, achieving greater health benefits and are less expensive than usual care. Across all the interventions considered, the reduction in inpatient and outpatient admissions was the main contributor to reducing costs.
KeywordsChronic disease Economics Integrated disease management programmes Systematic review
- 1.Kuipers Cavaco Y, Quoidbach V (2014) Public health in the EU: state-of-play and key policy challenges. Policy department A: economic and scientific policy. European Parliament, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 2.Jennings S (2014) Preventing chronic disease: defining the problem. Report from the prevention of chronic disease Programme. Health Service Executive, DublinGoogle Scholar
- 3.HSE (2016) Health service annual report and financial statements 2015. Health Service Executive, DublinGoogle Scholar
- 4.Nolte E, Pitchforth E (2014) What is the evidence on the economic impacts of integrated care. WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- 6.DoH (2012) Future health: a strategic framework for reform of the health service 2012–2015. Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
- 8.Nolte E, Knai C, Saltman RB (2014) Assessing chronic disease management in European health systems. WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Tsiachristas A (2015) Payment and economic evaluation of integrated care. International Journal of Integrated Care 15 (2)Google Scholar
- 10.CRD (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UKGoogle Scholar
- 11.Evers S, Paulus A (2015) Health economics and integrated care: a growing and challenging relationship. International Journal of Integrated Care 15 (2)Google Scholar
- 12.Nolte E, Knai C, McKee M (2008) Managing chronic conditions: experience in eight countries. WHO Regional Office Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- 13.Nolte E, McKee M (2008) Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. McGraw-Hill Education, UKGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C (2002) Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications—a discussion paper. International Journal of Integrated Care 2 (4)Google Scholar
- 15.HIQA (2014) Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland. Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
- 16.Shemilt I, Mugford M, Byford S, Drummond M, Eisenstein E, Knapp M, Mallender J, McDaid D, Vale L, Walker D (2008) Incorporating economics evidence. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions:449–480Google Scholar
- 19.Baeten SA, van Exel NJA, Dirks M, Koopmanschap MA, Dippel DW, Niessen LW (2010) Lifetime health effects and medical costs of integrated stroke services-a non-randomized controlled cluster-trial based life table approach. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 8(1)Google Scholar
- 20.McRae IS, Butler JR, Sibthorpe BM, Ruscoe W, Snow J, Rubiano D, Gardner KL (2008) A cost effectiveness study of integrated care in health services delivery: a diabetes program in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 8(1)Google Scholar
- 24.Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 11 (1)Google Scholar
- 25.Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacott N, Glanville J (2004) Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment 8 (36)Google Scholar
- 26.Huijsman R, Klazinga N, Scholteop Reimer W, Van Wijngaarden J, Van Exel N, Van Putte-Boon C, Prestholt F, Koopmanschap M, Niessen L (2001) Results of the EDISSE study of three regional experiments with stroke services. ZonMw—The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wagner EH (1997) Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Effective Clinical Practice 1(1):2–4Google Scholar