Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 186, Issue 4, pp 827–834 | Cite as

Can chronic disease be managed through integrated care cost-effectively? Evidence from a systematic review

  • J. CroninEmail author
  • A. Murphy
  • E. Savage
Original Article



The increase in demand for integrated care models to manage chronic disease is a challenge for the Irish health system, which is traditionally organised around the acute hospital services. Implementing integrated care programmes requires significant investment, and thus, their economic impact requires consideration.


This paper updates the previous evidence on the cost-effectiveness of integrated care programmes to support the development of a cost-effective integrated care programme for chronic disease management.


A systematic review of economic evaluations of integrated care programmes for chronic diseases (respiratory, cardiovascular, diabetes and musculoskeletal diseases) was performed using methods guided by the principles of conducting systematic reviews. The evidence was combined and summarised using a narrative synthesis. A meta-analysis of the evidence was not performed due to the heterogeneity of interventions and associated outcomes.


Six studies met the inclusion criteria; no study considered an integrated model of care that dealt with more than one chronic illness. Four chronic conditions were examined: stroke, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and COPD. Three studies were full economic evaluations, and three were partial economic evaluations.


The economic evidence, examined within this review, suggests that integrated care programmes have the potential to be cost-effective, achieving greater health benefits and are less expensive than usual care. Across all the interventions considered, the reduction in inpatient and outpatient admissions was the main contributor to reducing costs.


Chronic disease Economics Integrated disease management programmes Systematic review 

Supplementary material

11845_2017_1600_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)
11845_2017_1600_MOESM2_ESM.docx (29 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 29 kb)
11845_2017_1600_MOESM3_ESM.docx (20 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 19 kb)
11845_2017_1600_MOESM4_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 16 kb)
11845_2017_1600_MOESM5_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 15 kb)


  1. 1.
    Kuipers Cavaco Y, Quoidbach V (2014) Public health in the EU: state-of-play and key policy challenges. Policy department A: economic and scientific policy. European Parliament, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jennings S (2014) Preventing chronic disease: defining the problem. Report from the prevention of chronic disease Programme. Health Service Executive, DublinGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    HSE (2016) Health service annual report and financial statements 2015. Health Service Executive, DublinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nolte E, Pitchforth E (2014) What is the evidence on the economic impacts of integrated care. WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porter ME (2010) What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 363(26):2477–2481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DoH (2012) Future health: a strategic framework for reform of the health service 2012–2015. Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sampalli T (2012) Proposed model of integrated care to improve health outcomes for individuals with multimorbidities. Patient Prefer Adherence 6:757–764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nolte E, Knai C, Saltman RB (2014) Assessing chronic disease management in European health systems. WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsiachristas A (2015) Payment and economic evaluation of integrated care. International Journal of Integrated Care 15 (2)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CRD (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evers S, Paulus A (2015) Health economics and integrated care: a growing and challenging relationship. International Journal of Integrated Care 15 (2)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nolte E, Knai C, McKee M (2008) Managing chronic conditions: experience in eight countries. WHO Regional Office Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nolte E, McKee M (2008) Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. McGraw-Hill Education, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C (2002) Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications—a discussion paper. International Journal of Integrated Care 2 (4)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    HIQA (2014) Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland. Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shemilt I, Mugford M, Byford S, Drummond M, Eisenstein E, Knapp M, Mallender J, McDaid D, Vale L, Walker D (2008) Incorporating economics evidence. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions:449–480Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davies KS (2011) Formulating the evidence based practice question: a review of the frameworks. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 6(2):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Exel N, Koopmanschap M, Scholte op Reimer WS, Niessen LW, Huijsman R (2005) Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services. QJM 98(6):415–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baeten SA, van Exel NJA, Dirks M, Koopmanschap MA, Dippel DW, Niessen LW (2010) Lifetime health effects and medical costs of integrated stroke services-a non-randomized controlled cluster-trial based life table approach. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 8(1)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McRae IS, Butler JR, Sibthorpe BM, Ruscoe W, Snow J, Rubiano D, Gardner KL (2008) A cost effectiveness study of integrated care in health services delivery: a diabetes program in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 8(1)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giorda C, Picariello R, Nada E, Tartaglino B, Marafetti L, Costa G, Petrelli A, Gnavi R (2014) Comparison of direct costs of type 2 diabetes care: different care models with different outcomes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 24(7):717–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Delate T, Olson KL, Rasmussen J, Hutka K, Sandhoff B, Hornak R, Merenich J (2010) Reduced health care expenditures after enrollment in a collaborative cardiac care service. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 30(11):1127–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roberts JA, Maslin TK, Bakerly ND (2010) Development of an integrated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease service model in an inner-city region in the UK: initial findings and 12-month results. Primary Care Respiratory Journal 19(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 11 (1)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacott N, Glanville J (2004) Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment 8 (36)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huijsman R, Klazinga N, Scholteop Reimer W, Van Wijngaarden J, Van Exel N, Van Putte-Boon C, Prestholt F, Koopmanschap M, Niessen L (2001) Results of the EDISSE study of three regional experiments with stroke services. ZonMw—The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bollen MD (1996) Recent changes in Australian general practice. Med J Aust 164(4):212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    UKDPS (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352(9131):837–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wagner EH (1997) Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Effective Clinical Practice 1(1):2–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Policy Studies, Cork University Business SchoolUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Cork University Business SchoolUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  3. 3.School of Nursing & Midwifery, College of Medicine and HealthUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations