Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study was to assess Irish and Canadian obstetricians in training (“trainees”) experience, confidence, and comfort in performing operative vaginal delivery (OVD).
Study design
Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the University of Toronto and the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey reviewing experience as primary operator of OVD. Trainee confidence and comfort was self-assessed based upon their last few OVDs.
Results
The response rate was 55% amongst Canadian trainees (31/56) and 44% amongst Irish trainees (21/48). When comparing Irish with Canadian trainee experience, the median numbers of vacuum and forceps deliveries performed by Irish trainees as primary operator were reported to be higher [125 (range 10–150) vs 20 (range 5–40); p < 0.0001 (ventouse), 45 (range 10–150) vs 6 (range 1–12); p = 0.0001 (forceps)]. Despite this, trainee confidence between the groups did not differ [confidence score: 18.7 (SD 3.2) vs 17.8 (SD 3.5), p = 0.3]. There were some differences regarding comfort in certain aspects of OVD, most notably increased comfort in Irish trainees in pre-procedure assessment skills of OVD.
Conclusion
With falling OVD rates worldwide, training experience is declining. Despite higher numbers of OVD within the Irish trainee group, there was no difference in trainee confidence between the two groups. These results suggest that a high number of cases as primary operator may not be required to establish operator confidence in performing a procedure. Irish trainees self-reported more comfort in non-technical skills of OVD, suggesting a step-wise effect of experience on first technical and then non-technical skills.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken CE, Aiken AR, Park H, Brockelsby JC, Prentice A (2015) Factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes among obstetrics trainees. Med Educ 49(7):674–683
Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B (2010) Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150:147–151
Butler K, Ramphul M, Dunney C, Farren M, McSweeney A, McNamara K, Murphy DJ (2014) A prospective cohort study of the morbidity associated with operative vaginal deliveries performed by day and at night. BMJ Open 4(10):e006291
Ebulue V, Vadalkar J, Cely S, Dopwell F, Yoong W (2008) Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:1234–1238
Geoffrion R, Lee T, Singer J (2013) Validating a self-confidence scale for surgical trainees. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 35(4):355–361
Health Service Executive (Ireland) (2016) Perinatal Statistics Report 2014. Published 2016 at http://www.hpo.ie/latest_hipe_nprs_reports/NPRS_2014/Perinatal_Statistics_Report_2014.pdf (downloaded January 10th 2017)
Hodges R, Simpson A, Gurau D, Secter M, Mocarski E, Pittini R, Snelgrove J, Windrim R, Higgins M (2015) Learning from experience: development of a cognitive task-list to assess the second stage of labour for operative delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 37(4):354–361
Knight HE, van der Meulen JH, Gurol-Urganci I, Smith G, Kiran A, Thornton S, Richard D, Cameron A, Cromwell DA (2016) Birth “Out-of-hours”: an evaluation of obstetric practice and outcome according to the presence of senior obstetricians on the Labour Ward. PLoS Med 13(4):e1002000
Kyser KL, Lu X, Santillan D, Santillan M, Caughey AB, Wilson MC et al (2014) Forceps delivery volumes in teaching and nonteaching hospitals: are volumes suf cient for physicians to acquire and maintain competence? Acad Med 89(1):71–76
Muraca GM, Sabr Y, Brant R, Cundiff GW, Joseph KS (2016) Temporal and Regional cariations in operative vaginal delivery in Canada by pelvic station, 2004–2012. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 37(7):627–635
Olagundoye V, MacKenzie IZ (2007) The impact of a trial of instrumental delivery in theatre on neonatal outcome. BJOG 114:603–608
Patel R, Murphy D (2004) Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice. BMJ 328:1302–1305
Powell J, Gilo N, Foote M, Gil K, Lavin JP (2007) Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency. J Perinatol 27:343–346
Revah A, Ezra Y, Farine D, Ritchie K (1997) Failed trial of vacuum and/or forceps—maternal and fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:200–204
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) (2001) Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press, London
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) (2017) Green top Guidelines No 26: Operative Vaginal Delivery. Downloaded on January 10th 2017 from https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg26/
Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2007) Forceps delivery: potential benefits and a call for continued training. J Perinatol 27(6):327–328
Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) (2004) Guidelines for operative vaginal birth. Downloaded on January 10th 2017 from https://sogc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/148E-CPG-August2004.pdf
Solt I, Jackson S, Moore T, Rotmensch S, Kim MJ (2011) Teaching forceps: the impact of proactive faculty. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(5):448.e1–448.e4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.056
Unterscheider J, McMenamin M, Cullinane F (2011) Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 157:141–144
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
Questionnaire to participants
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crosby, D.A., Sarangapani, A., Simpson, A. et al. An international assessment of trainee experience, confidence, and comfort in operative vaginal delivery. Ir J Med Sci 186, 715–721 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1593-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1593-0