Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Xpert MRSA/SA blood culture PCR assay on management of positive blood cultures in obstetric patients: a retrospective audit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Xpert MRSA/SA blood culture assay (Cepheid, USA) is a rapid PCR test which can be used for positive blood cultures where Gram-positive cocci in clusters are seen. It can detect Staphylococcus aureus and also the mecA gene, which encodes for β-lactam resistance. The assay was introduced into the Rotunda Hospital for positive blood cultures to allow earlier detection of MRSA and methicillin susceptible S. aureus.

Aim

To assess the impact of the Xpert MRSA/SA blood culture assay on the management of obstetric patients with a positive blood culture where Gram-positive cocci in clusters were seen. The main outcome measures were duration of intravenous antimicrobials and length of admission.

Methods

Pre-intervention and post-intervention groups were identified relating to whether or not the test was in use at the time. A standardised form was used to retrospectively review the medical notes and laboratory results.

Results

There were 35 obstetric patients with positive blood cultures with Gram-positive cocci in clusters in the pre-intervention group and 22 cases in the post-intervention group. All 22 positive blood cultures in the post-intervention period were correctly identified. The antimicrobial duration was reduced from a median of 55.5–43.5 h and length of admission reduced from a median of 66.5–56 h (Mann–Whitney U value = 161, p = 0.46 and U value = 256, p = 0.15, respectively).

Conclusion

This study has shown a reduction in the median duration of intravenous antimicrobials and admission; however, larger multi-centre studies are needed to evaluate this potential benefit further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bates DW, Goldman L, Lee TH (1991) Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA 265(3):365–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zwang O, Albert RK (2006) Analysis of strategies to improve cost effectiveness of blood cultures. J Hosp Med 1(5):272–276. doi:10.1002/jhm.115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alahmadi YM, Aldeyab MA, McElnay JC et al (2011) Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 77(3):233–236. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Frye AM, Baker CA, Rustvold DL et al (2012) Clinical impact of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of staphylococcal bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 50(1):127–133. doi:10.1128/jcm.06169-11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchan BW, Allen S, Burnham CA (2015) Comparison of the next-generation Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay and the GeneOhm StaphSR assay to routine culture for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in positive-blood-culture broths. J Clin Microbiol 53(3):804–809. doi:10.1128/jcm.03108-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Parta M, Goebel M, Matloobi M, Stager C, Musher DM (2009) Identification of methicillin-resistant or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures and wound swabs by GeneXpert. J Clin Microbiol 47(5):1609–1610. doi:10.1128/jcm.00351-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Allaouchiche B, Jaumain H, Zambardi G, Chassard D, Freney J (1999) Clinical impact of rapid oxacillin susceptibility testing using a PCR assay in Staphylococcus aureus bactaeremia. J Infect 39(3):198–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhooria S, Gupta N, Bal A et al (2016) Role of Xpert MTB/RIF in differentiating tuberculosis from sarcoidosis in patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy undergoing EBUS-TBNA: a study of 147 patients. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis: Off J WASOG 33(3):258–266

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly-Cirino CD, Curry PS, Marola JL, Helstrom NK, Salfinger M (2016) Novel multi-day sputum transport reagent works with routine tuberculosis tests and eliminates need for cold chain: preliminary study of compatibility with the Xpert(R) MTB/RIF assay. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 86(3):273–276. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.08.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moussa H, Bayoumi FS, Ali AM (2016) Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for direct diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Saudi Med J 37(10):1076–1081. doi:10.15537/smj.2016.10.14998

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zboromyrska Y, De la Calle C, Soto M et al (2016) Rapid diagnosis of staphylococcal catheter-related bacteraemia in direct blood samples by real-time PCR. PLoS One 11(8):e0161684. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161684

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Spencer DH, Sellenriek P, Burnham CA (2011) Validation and implementation of the GeneXpert MRSA/SA blood culture assay in a pediatric setting. Am J Clin Pathol 136(5):690–694. doi:10.1309/ajcp07ugyokbvvnc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Drew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a relevant conflict of interest to disclose. No money was received from Cepheid for this project. The research was part of a quality improvement programme.

Funding

The GeneXpert platform was funded by Health Service Executive-Dublin North East Regional Healthcare Associated Infection/Antimicrobial Resistance Committee. Consumables were purchased through routine laboratory funds. No authors received payment for this study.

Informed consent

Consent was not obtained from patients as this was a retrospective audit and the standard treatment at that time was used as part of their care.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Page, A., O’Rourke, S., Brennan, M. et al. Impact of Xpert MRSA/SA blood culture PCR assay on management of positive blood cultures in obstetric patients: a retrospective audit. Ir J Med Sci 186, 995–998 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1581-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1581-4

Keywords

Navigation