Abstract
Background
Nephron-sparing surgery in the form of partial nephrectomy is increasingly becoming the standard of care in patients with small renal tumours. Oncological outcomes for partial nephrectomy are equivalent to radical nephrectomy, however, clamping of the hilar vessels to allow resection of tumours during partial nephrectomy may cause ischaemic damage to the kidney and result in long-term renal impairment.
Aim
We carried out a retrospective review of 43 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and assessed functional and oncological outcomes.
Methods
The operative technique initially utilised a thulium laser, with later cases using the LigaSure™ vessel sealing device. All patients underwent preoperative cross sectional imaging and anatomical classification accordingly.
Results
Forty three patients underwent LPN in our unit from 2006 to 2014. The mean (range) tumour diameter on preoperative cross sectional imaging was 28.2 (12–49) mm. All cases had a warm ischaemia time of zero, as hilar vessels were not clamped in any case. The mean (range) preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 73 (37 to >90) ml/min/1.73 m2 and was not significantly different to the post-operative mean (range) eGFR of 71 (31 to >90) ml/min/1.73 m2. 34 (79%) of the tumours were found to be malignant. Positive surgical margins were found in one case. The mean (range) follow-up time in our cohort was 61.6 (24–127) months and no patient has had a local or distant recurrence.
Conclusion
Zero ischaemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy appears to be a safe and oncologically satisfactory procedure for the management of small localised kidney tumours.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gill IS, Aron M, Gervais DA, Jewett MAS (2010) Clinical practice. Small renal mass. N Engl J Med 362(7):624–634
Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC (2000) Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 163(2):442–445
Ficarra V, Rossanese M, Gnech M, Novara G, Mottrie A (2014) Outcomes and limitations of laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 24(5):441–447
Minervini A, Siena G, Antonelli A et al (2013) Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project). World J Urol 32(1):257–263
Lane BR, Campbell SC, Gill IS (2013) 10-year oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 190(1):44–49
Favaretto RL, Sanchez-Salas R, Benoist N et al (2013) Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: mid-term results. J Endourol 27(1):52–57
Springer C, Hoda MR, Fajkovic H et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients. BJU Int 111(2):281–288
Tan H-J, Wolf JS, Ye Z, Hafez KS, Miller DC (2014) Population level assessment of hospital based outcomes following laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy during the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. J Urol 191(5):1231–1237
Trehan A (2014) Comparison of off-clamp partial nephrectomy and on-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 93(2):125–134
Kreshover JE, Kavoussi LR, Richstone L (2013) Hilar clamping versus off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1b tumors. Curr Opin Urol 23(5):399–402
George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes of off-clamp vs complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 111(4 Pt B):E235–E241
Salami SS, George AK, Rais-Bahrami S, Okhunov Z, Waingankar N, Kavoussi LR (2014) Off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. J Endourol 28(2):191–195
Liu W, Li Y, Chen M et al (2014) Off-clamp versus complete hilar control partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 28(5):567–576
Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D et al (2015) Evaluation of functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using renal scintigraphy: clamped vs clampless technique. BJU Int 115(4):606–612
Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S et al (2009) Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 56(5):786–793
Thomas AZ, Smyth L, Hennessey D, O’Kelly F, Moran D, Lynch TH (2013) Zero ischemia laparoscopic partial thulium laser nephrectomy. J Endourol 27(11):1366–1370
Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM et al (2010) Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58(3):340–345
Thompson RH, Frank I, Lohse CM et al (2007) The impact of ischemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on solitary kidneys: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 177(2):471–476
Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M et al (2011) “Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol 59(1):128–134
Kim TS, Oh JH, Rhew HY (2014) “Off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy” laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with perirenal fat and Gerota’s fascia reapproximation: initial experience and perioperative outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(5):339–344
Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR (2012) Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage. BJU Int 109(9):1376–1381
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
There was no funding obtained for this study.
Conflict of interest
No author has a conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Browne, C., Lonergan, P.E., Bolton, E.M. et al. A single centre experience of zero-ischaemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 186, 1023–1026 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1562-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1562-7