Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A practical description and student perspective of the integration of radiology into lower limb musculoskeletal anatomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anatomy educators are increasing their utilisation of radiology in anatomy education in line with growing requirements for undergraduate radiology competency and clinical need.

Aims

We aimed to evaluate student perceptions of radiology and to outline the technical and academic considerations underlying the integration of radiology into musculoskeletal practical anatomy sessions.

Materials and methods

The formal integration of radiology into anatomy practical sessions took place over a 5-week period during the lower limb musculoskeletal component of the anatomy course taught to first-year medical students. During practical sessions, students were required to rotate between aligned audio-visual radiology presentations, osteology/anatomical models, and prosection/dissection learning stations. After completing the course, students were invited to complete a survey to establish their opinions on radiology as a mode of learning and their satisfaction with radiological integration in anatomical practical sessions.

Results

Most students were not familiar with radiology prior to attending our university. All our students agreed or strongly agreed that learning to read radiographs in anatomy is important and most agreed that radiology is a valid assessment tool. Sixty percent stated that radiology facilitated their understanding of anatomy. The majority believed that radiology was best suited to clinically relevant anatomy and X-rays were their preferred learning tool.

Conclusions

The practical approach to integrating radiology into undergraduate musculoskeletal anatomy described here did not place strain on existing academic resources. Most students agreed that radiology should be increased in anatomy education and that learning to understand radiographs in anatomy was important for clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schober A et al (2014) “Anatomy and imaging”: 10 years of experience with an interdisciplinary teaching project in preclinical medical education—from an elective to a curricular course. Rofo 186(5):458–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Swamy M, Searle RF (2012) Anatomy teaching with portable ultrasound to medical students. BMC Med Educ 12:99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Caswell FR, Venkatesh A, Denison AR (2015) Twelve tips for enhancing anatomy teaching and learning using radiology. Med Teach 37(12):1067–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ebert RH (1992) Flexner’s model and the future of medical education. Acad Med 67(11):737–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzharris TP (1998) Survey of gross anatomy courses in the United States and Canada. Anat Rec 253(6):162–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arraez-Aybar LA, Bueno-Lopez JL, Moxham BJ (2014) Anatomists’ views on human body dissection and donation: an international survey. Ann Anat 196(6):376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheikh AH et al (2016) Cadaveric anatomy in the future of medical education: what is the surgeons view? Anat Sci Educ 9(2):203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Older J (2004) Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2(2):79–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marom A, Tarrasch R (2015) On behalf of tradition: an analysis of medical student and physician beliefs on how anatomy should be taught. Clin Anat 28(8):980–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis CR et al (2014) Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ 7(4):262–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Azer SA, Eizenberg N (2007) Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat 29(2):173–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Den Op Akker JW et al (2002) Giving color to a new curriculum: bodypaint as a tool in medical education. Clin Anat 15(5):356–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barry DS et al (2016) Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci Educ 9(1):90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stirling A, Birt J (2014) An enriched multimedia eBook application to facilitate learning of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 7(1):19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pickering JD (2015) Anatomy drawing screencasts: enabling flexible learning for medical students. Anat Sci Educ 8(3):249–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobson S et al (2009) Creation of virtual patients from CT images of cadavers to enhance integration of clinical and basic science student learning in anatomy. Med Teach 31(8):749–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell BS, Williams JE (2002) Trends in radiological anatomy teaching in the U.K. and Ireland. Clin Radiol 57(12):1070–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drake RL et al (2009) Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2(6):253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho MJ, Hwang YI (2013) Students’ perception of anatomy education at a Korean medical college with respect to time and contents. Anat Cell Biol 46(2):157–162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Topping DB (2014) Gross anatomy videos: student satisfaction, usage, and effect on student performance in a condensed curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 7(4):273–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mukhtar Y, Mukhtar S, Chadwick SJ (2009) Lost at sea: anatomy teaching at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. Med Educ 43(11):1078–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheikh AH et al (2016) Cadaveric anatomy in the future of medical education: What is the surgeons view? Anat Sci Educ 9:203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy KP et al (2014) Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning. Insights Imaging 5(5):629–634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Shanks SC (1950) The place of radiology in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Press 224(13):291–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Craig S et al (2010) Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg 80(4):212–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grignon B, Oldrini G, Walter F (2016) Teaching medical anatomy: what is the role of imaging today? Surg Radiol Anat 38:253–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jack A, Burbridge B (2012) The utilisation of radiology for the teaching of anatomy in Canadian medical schools. Can Assoc Radiol J 63(3):160–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zafar AM (2009) Radiology: an underutilized resource for undergraduate curricula. Med Teach 31(3):266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kourdioukova EV et al (2011) Analysis of radiology education in undergraduate medical doctors training in Europe. Eur J Radiol 78(3):309–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ganske I et al (2006) Teaching methods in anatomy courses in North American medical schools the role of radiology. Acad Radiol 13(8):1038–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kondrashov P et al (2015) Impact of the clinical ultrasound elective course on retention of anatomical knowledge by second-year medical students in preparation for board exams. Clin Anat 28(2):156–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Colucci PG et al (2015) Development and utilization of a web-based application as a robust radiology teaching tool (radstax) for medical student anatomy teaching. Acad Radiol 22(2):247–255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Murakami T et al (2014) An integrated teaching method of gross anatomy and computed tomography radiology. Anat Sci Educ 7(6):438–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Phillips AW et al (2012) Improved understanding of human anatomy through self-guided radiological anatomy modules. Acad Radiol 19(7):902–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gunderman RB, Wilson PK (2005) Viewpoint: exploring the human interior: the roles of cadaver dissection and radiologic imaging in teaching anatomy. Acad Med 80(8):745–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. de Barros N et al (2001) The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation. Clin Anat 14(1):36–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF (2014) Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: a case for medical imaging and vertical integration. Anat Sci Educ 7(4):251–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dettmer S et al (2010) Teaching surgery, radiology and anatomy together: the mix enhances motivation and comprehension. Surg Radiol Anat 32(8):791–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wijnen-Meijer M et al (2010) Vertical integration in medical school: effect on the transition to postgraduate training. Med Educ 44(3):272–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Feigin DS et al (2007) Learning and retaining normal radiographic chest anatomy: does preclinical exposure improve student performance? Acad Radiol 14(9):1137–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Roche A et al (2009) Physical examination of the foot and ankle by orthopaedic and accident and emergency clinicians. Injury 40(2):136–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Buckenham T (2013) Undergraduate anatomy teaching: whose responsibility? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 57(3):261–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gunderman RB et al (2003) The vital role of radiology in the medical school curriculum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(5):1239–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Heitkamp DE, Gunderman RB (2014) The interventional radiology/diagnostic radiology certificate: asking the hard questions. Radiology 273(2):322–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Afaq A, McCall J (2002) Improving undergraduate education in radiology. Acad Radiol 9(2):221–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Drake RL (1998) Anatomy education in a changing medical curriculum. Anat Rec 253(1):28–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pascual TN et al (2011) Undergraduate radiology education in the era of dynamism in medical curriculum: an educational perspective. Eur J Radiol 78(3):319–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mirsadraee S et al (2012) Radiology curriculum for undergraduate medical studies—a consensus survey. Clin Radiol 67(12):1155–1161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Marker DR et al (2010) Developing a radiology-based teaching approach for gross anatomy in the digital era. Acad Radiol 17(8):1057–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Samuel S, Shaffer K (2000) Profile of medical student teaching in radiology: teaching methods, staff participation, and rewards. Acad Radiol 7(10):868–874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Heptonstall NB, Ali T, Mankad K (2016) Integrating radiology and anatomy teaching in medical education in the UK—the evidence, current trends, and future scope. Acad Radiol 23(4):521–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bhangu A et al (2010) A three-year prospective longitudinal cohort study of medical students’ attitudes toward anatomy teaching and their career aspirations. Anat Sci Educ 3(4):184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. McLachlan JC et al (2004) Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 38(4):418–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. McLachlan JC, Patten D (2006) Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ 40(3):243–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Erkonen WE et al (1992) Effectiveness of teaching radiologic image interpretation in gross anatomy. A long-term follow-up. Invest Radiol 27(3):264–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chowdhury R, Wilson ID, Oeppen RS (2008) The departments of radiology and anatomy: new symbiotic relations? Clin Radiol 63(8):918–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Arya R et al (2013) Making education effective and fun: stations-based approach to teaching radiology and anatomy to third-year medical students. Acad Radiol 20(10):1311–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Phillips AW, Smith SG, Straus CM (2013) The role of radiology in preclinical anatomy: a critical review of the past, present, and future. Acad Radiol 20(3):297–304 (e1)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lipkind KL (1995) National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 1993 outpatient department summary. Adv Data 268:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yelin EH, Felts WR (1990) A summary of the impact of musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 33(5):750–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Freedman KB, Bernstein J (2002) Educational deficiencies in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(4):604–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pinney SJ, Regan WD (2001) Educating medical students about musculoskeletal problems. Are community needs reflected in the curricula of Canadian medical schools? J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(9):1317–1320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. DiCaprio MR, Covey A, Bernstein J (2003) Curricular requirements for musculoskeletal medicine in American medical schools. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(3):565–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Craton N, Matheson GO (1993) Training and clinical competency in musculoskeletal medicine. Identifying the problem. Sports Med 15(5):328–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mulhall KJ, Masterson E (2002) The prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints in Irish general practice: implications for musculoskeletal training. Ir Med J 95(6):186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Booth A, Wise DI (1990) General practice training in musculoskeletal disorders. Br J Gen Pract 40(338):390

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. DiGiovanni BF et al (2014) Factors impacting musculoskeletal knowledge and clinical confidence in graduating medical students. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(21):e185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Al-Nammari SS et al (2015) The inadequacy of musculoskeletal knowledge in graduating medical students in the United Kingdom. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(7):e36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Day CS et al (2007) Musculoskeletal medicine: an assessment of the attitudes and knowledge of medical students at Harvard Medical School. Acad Med 82(5):452–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Skelley NW et al (2012) Medical student musculoskeletal education: an institutional survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(19):e146 (1–7)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Whelan A et al (2016) Student perceptions of independent versus facilitated small group learning approaches to compressed medical anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 9(1):40–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nieder GL et al (2005) Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat 18(1):56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, Holland BK (2008) Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anat Sci Educ 1(1):3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Martinez EG, Tuesca R (2014) Modified team-based learning strategy to improve human anatomy learning: a pilot study at the Universidad del Norte in Barranquilla, Colombia. Anat Sci Educ 7(5):399–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Huitt TW, Killins A, Brooks WS (2015) Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students’ attitudes toward teamwork. Anat Sci Educ 8(2):95–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Murphy KP et al (2015) Medical student perceptions of radiology use in anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ 8(6):510–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Pabst R (2009) Anatomy curriculum for medical students: what can be learned for future curricula from evaluations and questionnaires completed by students, anatomists and clinicians in different countries? Ann Anat 191(6):541–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Benninger B, Matsler N, Delamarter T (2014) Classic versus millennial medical lab anatomy. Clin Anat 27(7):988–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Slanetz PJ, Kung J, Eisenberg RL (2013) Teaching radiology in the millennial era. Acad Radiol 20(3):387–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rizzolo LJ et al (2006) Design principles for developing an efficient clinical anatomy course. Med Teach 28(2):142–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Shaffer K, Small JE (2004) Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy. Acad Radiol 11(9):1059–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Turmezei TD, Tam MD, Loughna S (2009) A survey of medical students on the impact of a new digital imaging library in the dissection room. Clin Anat 22(6):761–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Kotze SH, Mole CG, Greyling LM (2012) The translucent cadaver: an evaluation of the use of full body digital X-ray images and drawings in surface anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 5(5):287–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Erkonen WE et al (1990) Gross anatomy instruction with diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 25(3):292–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Bassett LW, Squire LF (1985) Anatomy instruction by radiologists. Invest Radiol 20(9):1008–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Lanier L, Kaude JV (1993) Radiologic anatomy–a credit course for first-year medical students. Acta Radiol 34(4):414–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Clough RW, Lehr RP (1996) Testing knowledge of human gross anatomy in medical school: an applied contextual-learning theory method. Clin Anat 9(4):263–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

    S. Davy, N. Mahony, N. Phelan & D. S. Barry

  2. Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    G. W. O’Keeffe

Authors
  1. S. Davy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. W. O’Keeffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Mahony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Phelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. S. Barry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Barry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest during the preparation of this manuscript or as part of its intended publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davy, S., O’Keeffe, G.W., Mahony, N. et al. A practical description and student perspective of the integration of radiology into lower limb musculoskeletal anatomy. Ir J Med Sci 186, 409–417 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1487-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1487-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation