Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery in obese patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A number of comorbid health problems can be found in obese patients. These problems increase the surgical risk in obese patients.

Aims

To determine the effectiveness of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone treatment in obese patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 106 patients who had retrograde intrarenal surgery with the diagnosis of renal stone in our clinic. The patients were divided into three groups regarding their body mass indexes: ≥30 kg/m2 being obese (group 1), 25–29.9 kg/m2 being overweight (group 2), and <25 kg/m2 being normal weight (group 3). The patients were compared for age, gender, and stone characteristics. In addition, the duration of surgery, stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, and the duration of the hospital stay were compared among the groups.

Results

Twenty eight patients were obese (group 1), 49 patients were overweight (group 2), and 29 patients were normal weight (group 3). The mean ages of groups 1, 2 and 3 were 51.5 (29–84), 47 (30–76) and 35 (19–84) years, respectively (p = 0.001). SFR was 85.7 % in group 1, 89.8 % in group 2, and 75.9 % in group 3 (p = 0.24). The duration of surgery was similar in groups 1, 2, and 3, being 45.5 (25–95), 50 (30–120), and 45.5 (10–100) min, respectively (p = 0.23). None of the patients had major complications.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that retrograde intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient surgical method for renal stone treatment in obese and overweight patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK et al (2013) Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief 131:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB et al (1998) Body size and risk of kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:1645–1652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abate N, Chandalia M, Cabo-Chan AV Jr et al (2004) The metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis: novel features of renal manifestation of insulin resistance. Kidney Int 65:386–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerstetter J, Caballero B, O’Brien K et al (1991) Mineral homeostasis in obesity: effects of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Metabolism 40:707–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nowicki M, Kokot F, Surdacki A (1998) The influence of hyperinsulinemia on calcium-phosphate metabolism in renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:2566–2571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Schuster T et al (2010) Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy stratified by body mass index. J Endourol 24:547–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Calvert RC, Burgess NA (2005) Urolithiasis and obesity: metabolic and technical considerations. Curr Opin Urol 15:113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt JD et al (2012) The CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: the influence of body mass index on outcome. J Urol 188:138–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andreoni C, Afane J, Olweny E et al (2001) Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: first-line therapy for proximal ureteral and renal calculi in the morbidly obese and superobese patient. J Endourol 15:493–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chew BH, Zavaglia B, Paterson RF et al (2013) A multicenter comparison of the safety and effectiveness of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in obese and normal weight patients. J Endourol 27:710–714. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Natalin R, Xavier K, Okeke Z et al (2009) Impact of obesity on ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy of urinary tract calculi. Int Braz J Urol 35:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1991) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Siener R, Glatz S, Nicolay C et al (2004) The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formation. Obes Res 12:106–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Powell CR, Stoller ML, Schwartz BF et al (2000) Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers. Urology 55:825–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ekeruo WO, Tan YH, Young MD et al (2004) Metabolic risk factors and the impact of medical therapy on the management of nephrolithiasis in obese patients. J Urol 172:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dash A, Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK et al (2002) Ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi in morbidly obese patients: a stone-matched comparison. Urology 60:393–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bagrodia A, Gupta A, Raman JD et al (2008) Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology 72(4):756–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonulalan U, Akand M, Coban G et al (2014) Skin-to-stone distance has no impact on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int 92(4):444–448. doi:10.1159/000356562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuntz NJ, Neisius A, Astroza GM et al (2014) Does body mass index impact the outcomes of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 114:404–411. doi:10.1111/bju.12538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Giusti G, Proietti S, Luciani LG et al (2014) Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal Stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard? Can J Urol 21:7207–7212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alkan E, Avci E, Ozkanli AO et al (2014) Same session bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery for upper urinary system stones: safety and efficacy. J Endourol 28:757–762. doi:10.1089/end.2013.0766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Caskurlu T, Atis G, Arikan O et al (2013) The impact of body mass index on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery. Urology 81(3):517–521. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. G. Doluoglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from patients or/and guardians in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doluoglu, O.G., Karakan, T., Kabar, M. et al. Effectiveness of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery in obese patients. Ir J Med Sci 185, 847–851 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1379-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1379-1

Keywords

Navigation