Abstract
Introduction
The majority of patients with scrotal problems or urinary symptoms will first present to their general practitioner (GP). The importance of the initial examination performed by the GP is often underestimated; however, it frequently determines the course of investigation and ultimately treatment. Unfortunately, medical schools have devoted increasingly less time to teaching urology over the past decade. The impact of this decline in teaching on a GP trainee’s assessment of urological complaints remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the self-reported competency of GP trainees in assessing urological presentations.
Methods
A questionnaire was circulated to 101 GP trainees from five separate training programmes. Respondents rated their confidence in evaluating four different urological presentations. They were also invited to give their opinion regarding the teaching of urology on their current scheme and whether they would be in favour of the addition of urology as an optional rotation.
Results
Only 18 trainees (19 %) felt urology was adequately covered on their curriculum. A small yet significant number of respondents felt uncomfortable in their assessment of testicular (28 %, 28/101) or prostate (35 %, 35/101) pathology and male (17 %, 17/101) or female (10 %, 10/101) urinary symptoms. Twenty-six trainees (26 %) would choose a rotation in urology if available. Another ten trainees felt that attending urology outpatient clinics would benefit training.
Conclusion
This study highlights a number of concerns among GP trainees in relation to their training in urology. These issues should be addressed to ensure that the training scheme sufficiently prepares GPs to manage common urological conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stothers L, Thom D, Calhoun E (2005) Urologic Diseases in America Project: urinary incontinence in males-demographics and economic burden. J Urol 173:1302
Thom DH, Nyguard IE, Calhoun EA (2005) Urologic Diseases in America Project: urinary incontinence in women national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment and economic impact. J Urol 173:1295
Heidler S, Deveza C, Temml C, Ponholzer A et al (2007) The natural history of lower urinary tract symptoms in females: analysis of a health screening project. Eur Urol 52(6):1744–1750
Jacobsen SJ, Girman CJ, Lieber MM (2001) Natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 58(Suppl 1):5–16
Department of Health (2004) Population Ageing in Ireland Projections 2002–2021. Report no. 81. Dublin: National Council on Ageing and Older People. ISBN 1 900378 32 9
Stubbings CA, Gowers JI (1979) A comparison of trainee and trainer clinical experience. J R Coll Gen Pract 29(198):47–52
Carney TA (1979) Clinical experience of a trainee in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 29(198):40–44
Hoffman RM, Blume P, Gilliland F (1998) Prostate-specific antigen testing practices and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 13:106
Fawzy A, Fontenot C, Guthrie R, Baudier MM (1997) Practice patterns among primary care physicians in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Fam Med 29:321
Teichman JM, Weiss BD, Solomon D (1999) Urological needs assessment for primary care practice: implications for undergraduate medical education. J Urol 161:1282
Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Beerbohm EM (2005) The burden of urologic diseases in America. J Urol 173:1065
Burns E, Flocks RH, Higgins CC, Hotchkiss RS, Vest SA, Weyrauch HM et al (1956) The present status of undergraduate urologic training. J Urol 76:309
Benson GS (1994) The decline of urological education in United States medical schools. J Urol 152:169
Rous SN, Lancaster C (1988) The current status of undergraduate urological teaching. J Urol 139:1160
Rous SN, Mendelson M (1978) A report on the present status of undergraduate urologic teaching in medical schools and some resulting recommendations. J Urol 119:303
Loughlin KR (2008) The current status of medical student urological education in the United States. J Urol 179:1087
Kerfoot BP, Masser BA, Dewolf WC (2006) The continued decline of formal urological education of medical students in the United States: does it matter? J Urol 175(6):2243–2247
Boyle E, Healy D, Hill ADK (2013) Career choices of today’s medical students: where does surgery rank? Ir J Med Sci 182:337–343
Lambert TW, Goldacre MJ, Edwards C, Parkhouse J (1996) Career preferences of doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1993 compared with those of doctors qualifying in 1974, 1977, 1980 and 1983. BMJ 313:19–24
Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM (2004) Experience and attitudes of final-year medical students to digital rectal examination. Med J Aust 181:323–325
Turner KJ, Brewster SF (2000) Rectal examination and urethral catheterization by medical students and house officers: taught but not used. BJU Int 86:422–426
Mishail A, Shahsavari M, Kim J, Welliver RC, Vemulapalli P, Adler HL (2008) Deficits in urological knowledge among medical students and primary care providers: potential for impact on urological care. J Urol 180:2140–2147
Teichman JM, Weiss BD, Solomon D (1999) Urological needs assessment for primary care practice: implications for undergraduate medical education. J Urol 161:1282
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redmond, E.J., Kelly, N.P., McCarthy, C. et al. Attitudes of GP trainees towards the training received in urology on the GP training scheme. Ir J Med Sci 185, 165–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1261-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1261-1