Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of maternal screening in diagnosing congenital cytomegalovirus infections in highly immune populations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most important infectious cause of central nervous system disease and hearing loss in children.

Aims

In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of maternal screening in early diagnosis of congenital infection in highly immune populations.

Methods

A total of 163 women were included in the study; 103 of the subjects were pregnant and were at full term. The other 60 women were not pregnant, and all were healthy.

Results

CMV IgG seropositivity among the pregnant and control groups was found to be 98.1 % (101/103) and 98.3 % (59/60), respectively, and high IgG avidity was found in all women who had IgG positivity. We did not find any primary CMV infection in the two groups. The recurrent infection rate was found to be 5.82 % in the pregnant group and 3.33 % in the control group. There were no significant differences between the pregnant and control women in terms of CMV excretion in urine samples (4.85 vs. 3.33 %, respectively; P = 1.000) or CMV-DNA presence in serum samples (1.94 vs. 0.0 %, respectively; P = 0.532). The presence of symptomatic infection was not observed in any of the 104 babies born from the 103 pregnancies.

Conclusions

According to our results, a maternal screening-based approach would be useful for only a very small group that is at risk of primary infection. Considering the cost of the scan, a routine maternal-based screening program is unadvisable in developing societies, but it is necessary for studies of different cohort groups and infectious diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mocarski ES, Pass RF (2008) Human cytomegalovirus: general features. In: Mahy BWJ, Van Regenmortel MHV (eds) Encyclopedia of virology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 474–485

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Preston CM (2008) Herpesviruses: latency. In: Mahy BWJ, Van Regenmortel MHV (eds) Encyclopedia of virology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 436–442

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kenneson A, Cannon MJ (2007) Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 17(4):253–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cannon MJ, Hyde TB, Schmid DS (2011) Review of cytomegalovirus shedding in bodily fluids and relevance to congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol 21(4):240–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boppana SB (2006) Cytomegalovirus. In: Hutto C (ed) Congenital and perinatal infections. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, pp 73–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. de Graan-Hentzen YC, Gratama JW, Mudde GC et al (1989) Prevention of primary cytomegalovirus infection in patients with hematologic malignancies by intensive white cell depletion of blood products. Transfusion 29:757–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoenfisch AL, Dollard SC, Amin M et al (2011) Cytomegalovirus (CMV) shedding is highly correlated with markers of immunosuppression in CMV-seropositive women. J Med Microbiol 60(Pt 6):768–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira L, Maidji E, McDonagh S, Tabata T (2005) Insights into viral transmission at the uterine-placental interface. Trends Microbiol 13(4):164–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stagno S, Pass RF, Cloud G et al (1986) Primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Incidence, transmission to fetus, and clinical outcome. JAMA 256(14):1904–1908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahlfors K, Ivarsson SA, Harris S et al (1984) Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and disease in Sweden and the relative importance of primary and secondary maternal infections. Scand J Infect Dis 16(2):129–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stagno S, Reynolds DW, Huang ES, Thames SC, Smith RJ, Alford CA (1977) Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: occurrence in an immune population. N Engl J Med 296(22):1254–1258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morris DJ, Sims D, Chiswick M, Das VK, Newton VE (1994) Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection after maternal recurrent infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 13(1):61–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Picone O, Vauloup-Fellous C, Cordier AG et al (2013) A series of 238 cytomegalovirus primary infections during pregnancy: description and outcome. Prenat Diagn 33(8):751–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazzarotto T, Varani S, Guerra B, Nicolosi A, Lanari M, Landini MP (2000) Prenatal indicators of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 137(1):90–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Isolation of DNA from mammalian cells. In: Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (eds) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (Vol 1), 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp 9.16–9.19

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kubar A, Saygun I, Yapar M, Ozdemir A, Slots J (2004) Real-time PCR quantification of cytomegalovirus in aggressive periodontitis lesions using TaqMan technology. J Periodontal Res 39(2):81–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kubar A, Saygun I, Özdemir A, Yapar M, Slots J (2005) Real-time polymerase chain reaction quantification of human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in periodontal pockets and the adjacent gingiva of periodontitis lesions. J Periodont Res 40:97–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yapar M, Aydogan H, Pahsa A et al (2005) Rapid and quantitative detection of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus by one-step real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR. Jpn J Infect Dis 58:358–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sahiner F, Gumral R, Sener K et al (2012) Investigation of HPV-DNA in cervical smear samples by two different methods: MY09/11 consensus PCR and type-specific real-time PCR. Mikrobiyol Bul 46(4):624–636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludwig A, Hengel H (2009) Epidemiological impact and disease burden of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Europe. Euro Surveill 14(9):26–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Naessens A, Casteels A, Decatte L, Foulon W (2005) A serologic strategy for detecting neonates at risk for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 146(2):194–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grangeot-Keros L, Simon B, Audibert F, Vial M (1998) Should we routinely screen for cytomegalovirus antibody during pregnancy? Intervirology 41(4–5):158–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lazzarotto T, Varani S, Spezzacatena P et al (1998) Delayed acquisition of high-avidity anticytomegalovirus antibody is correlated with prolonged antigenemia in solid organ transplant recipients. J Infect Dis 178(4):1145–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lazzarotto T, Spezzacatena P, Varani S et al (1999) Anticytomegalovirus (anti-CMV) immunoglobulin G avidity in identification of pregnant women at risk of transmitting congenital CMV infection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 6(1):127–129

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ataman S, Colak D, Gunseren F et al (2007) Investigation of cytomegalovirus seroepidemiology in Antalya with a population-based cross-sectional study and review of related data in Turkey. Mikrobiyol Bul 41(4):545–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Satılmış A, Güra A, Ongun H, Mendilcioğlu I, Çolak D, Oygür N (2007) CMV seroconversion in pregnants and the incidence of congenital CMV infection. Turk J Pediatr 49(1):30–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ocak S, Zeteroglu S, Ozer C, Dolapcioglu K, Gungoren A (2007) Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii, rubella and cytomegalovirus among pregnant women in southern Turkey. Scand J Infect Dis 39(3):231–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Griffiths PD, Baboonian C, Rutter D, Peckham C (1991) Congenital and maternal cytomegalovirus infections in a London population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98(2):135–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yow MD, Williamson DW, Leeds LJ et al (1988) Epidemiologic characteristics of cytomegalovirus infection in mothers and their infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158(5):1189–1195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shen CY, Chang SF, Yen MS, Ng HT, Huang ES, Wu CW (1993) Cytomegalovirus excretion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 31(6):1635–1636

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stagno S, Reynolds D, Tsiantos A et al (1975) Cervical cytomegalovirus excretion in pregnant and nonpregnant women: suppression in early gestation. J Infect Dis 131(5):522–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Collier AC, Handsfield HH, Ashley R et al (1995) Cervical but not urinary excretion of cytomegalovirus is related to sexual activity and contraceptive practices in sexually active women. J Infect Dis 171(1):33–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pass RF, Stagno S, Dworsky ME, Smith RJ, Alford CA (1982) Excretion of cytomegalovirus in mothers: observation after delivery of congenitally infected and normal infants. J Infect Dis 146(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dollard SC, Grosse SD, Ross DS (2007) New estimates of the prevalence of neurological and sensory sequelae and mortality associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol 17(5):355–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stagno S, Pass RF, Dworsky ME, Alford CA (1983) Congenital and perinatal cytomegalovirus infections. Semin Perinatol 7(1):31–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF (2003) Maternal immunity and prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA 289(8):1008–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethical standard

This study was conducted after approval from the local ethics committee (Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey), and informed consent was obtained from the study subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Şahiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Şahiner, F., Honca, M., Çekmez, Y. et al. The role of maternal screening in diagnosing congenital cytomegalovirus infections in highly immune populations. Ir J Med Sci 184, 475–481 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1149-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1149-5

Keywords

Navigation