Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science

, Volume 183, Issue 2, pp 215–217 | Cite as

The potential lost hospital income from miscoded emergency department boarders in Ireland

  • L. Healy
  • E. Moloney
  • M. O’Connor
  • C. Henry
  • S. TimmonsEmail author
Original Article
  • 101 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Emergency department (ED) boarders, namely patients who have been admitted under an in-patient service but remain on a trolley in the ED, have long been a problem in the Irish healthcare system.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all ED boarders in Cork University Hospital (CUH) for a 6-month period from January to July 2011. Data were obtained from the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry Office (HIPE). The income generated by the hospital for a subset of these patients (January and February attendances) was obtained from the Finance Office in the hospital, based on diagnoses as recorded on the HIPE system. A convenience sample of two-thirds of the 39 acute hospitals nationally was surveyed to ascertain whether ED boarders were coded by individual HIPE offices as hospital in-patients or as ED attendees.

Results

A total of 806 patients were admitted to an in-patient service from January to July 2011 in CUH and subsequently discharged, having completed their entire stay in the ED. The income generated by a sub-sample of 228 patients (January and February ED boarders) was determined. The hospital was remunerated by €685,111 for these patients, i.e. an average income of €3,098 per patient. Only 8 hospitals of the 27 surveyed hospitals coded overnight ED Boarders as in-patients and were thus able to request income for these patients appropriately.

Conclusion

Discrepancies in coding of ED boarders may result in significant revenue losses for certain hospitals.

Keywords

HIPE Coding Boarder Trolley Emergency department 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Pines JM, Hilton JA, Weber EJ et al (2011) International perspectives on overcrowding. Acad Emerg Med 18(12):1358–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein SL, Aronsky D, Duseja R et al (2009) The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 16(1):1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu SW, Chang Y, Camargo CA Jr et al (2012) A mixed-methods study of the quality of care provided to patients boarding in the emergency department: comparing emergency department and inpatient responsibility models. Med Care Res Rev 69(6):679–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diercks DB, Roe MT, Chen AY et al (2007) Prolonged Emergency Dept stays of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients are associated with worse adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management and increased adverse events. Ann Emerg Med 50(5):489–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr, Viccelio P et al (2011) The association between length of emergency department boarding and mortality. Acad Emerg Med 18(12):1324–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pines JM, Pollack CV Jr, Diercks DB, Chang AM et al (2009) The association between Emergency Dept. crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med 16(7):617–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Healy
    • 1
  • E. Moloney
    • 1
  • M. O’Connor
    • 1
  • C. Henry
    • 2
  • S. Timmons
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Geriatric MedicineCork University HospitalCorkIreland
  2. 2.Department of Geriatric MedicineMercy University HospitalCorkIreland
  3. 3.Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations