Abstract
Background
Hyperglycaemia is common amongst hospitalised patients. Some of this is due to pre-existing diabetes (either previously diagnosed or not), but a proportion is due to stress hyperglycaemia, a transient state of high blood sugars related to the underlying illness.
Aims
We aimed to estimate the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in an Irish hospital setting, including an assessment of what contribution is made by cases of stress hyperglycaemia.
Methods
Over a 9-day period, all bedside glucometer-measured point of care blood glucoses performed in medical and surgical wards in University Hospital Galway were examined. Medical case notes and our diabetes computerised database were analysed to identify individuals with pre-existing diabetes. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured on the remainder of patients, to differentiate between pre-existing diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol) and stress hyperglycaemia (HbA1c < 48 mmol/mol).
Results
A total of 1,637 glucose readings were performed on 262 in-patients, of which 164 (63 %) were in the hyperglycaemic range. Of the 126 eligible for study inclusion, 92 (73 %) had pre-existing diabetes and 11 (9 %) had previously undiagnosed diabetes. The remaining 20 patients (16 %) had stress hyperglycaemia.
Conclusions
We report a high prevalence of hyperglycaemia (including stress hyperglycaemia) in an in-patient cohort in whom testing was undertaken at the discretion of the treating physician. Our data illustrate the utility of HbA1c measurement in this setting to help differentiate between pre-existing diabetes and stress hyperglycaemia. Much work remains to be done on how to best identify and treat in-patient hyperglycaemia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clement S, Braithwaite SS, Magee MF et al (2004) Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals. Diabetes Care 27:553–591
Dungan KM, Braithwaite SS, Preiser JC (2009) Stress hyperglycaemia. Lancet 373:1798–1807
Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N et al (2002) Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:978–982
Kosiborod M, Rathore SS, Inzucchi SE et al (2005) Admission glucose and mortality in elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infraction: implications for patients with and without recognized diabetes. Circulation 111:3078–3086
Vibo R, Korv J, Roose M (2007) One-year outcome after first-ever stroke according to stroke subtype, severity, risk factors and pre-stroke treatment. A population-based study from Tartu, Estonia. Eur J Neurol 14:435–439
International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes (2009). Diabetes Care 32: 1327–1334
Wexler DJ, Nathan DM, Grant RW et al (2008) Prevalence of elevated hemoglobin A1c among patients admitted to the hospital without a diagnosis of diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:4238–4244
Mazurek JA, Hailpern SM, Goring T et al (2010) Prevalence of hemoglobin A1c greater than 6.5 % and 7.0 % among hospitalized patients without known diagnosis of diabetes at an urban inner city hospital. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:1344–1348
Rahman N, Collins A, Sheehan J et al (2000) Undetected hyperglycaemia among hospital in-patients. Ir Med J 93:268–270
Moghissi ES, Korytkowski MT, DiNardo M et al (2009) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control. Diabetes Care 32:1119–1131
Valentine NA, Alhawassi TM, Roberts GW, Vora PP, Stranks SN, Doogue MP (2011) Detecting undiagnosed diabetes using glycated haemoglobin: an automated screening test in hospitalised patients. Med J Aust 194(4):160–164
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Sullivan, E.P., Duignan, J., O’Shea, P. et al. Evaluating hyperglycaemia in the hospitalised patient: towards an improved system for classification and treatment. Ir J Med Sci 183, 65–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0973-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0973-3