Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Not written, not done: are we identifying elderly at-risk patients for pneumococcal vaccination?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pneumococcal disease, especially in its invasive form, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, with the advent of vaccination, invasive disease is potentially avoidable. This study aimed to assess the documentation of pneumococcal vaccination status in elderly patients by healthcare professionals in a busy teaching hospital environment.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-seven open (active) medical records of inpatients and outpatients aged over 65 years were reviewed, to examine for evidence of documentation of pneumococcal vaccination status.

Results

From the medical records, 338 patient encounters were studied. Overall, there was a mean of 2.4 ± 1.2 indications for pneumococcal vaccination, with more indications in medical than in surgical patients (P = 0.04). The rate of recording in respiratory outpatient clinics was 71.4 % in comparison to 0 % in other medical and surgical outpatient clinics. Overall the documentation rate was 2.1 %.

Conclusions

Only respiratory physicians had demonstrable evidence of actively asking about pneumococcal vaccination on a regular basis. There is considerable need for increased awareness among healthcare professionals and improvement in methods of recording vaccination status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Health Protection Surveillance Centre (2010) Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Annual Report 2010. HPSC Online. http://www.hpsc.ie/hpsc/A-Z/VaccinePreventable/PneumococcalDisease/Publications/AnnualReportsonInvasivePneumococcalDisease/File,13123,en.pdf. Accessed 01 May 2012

  2. National Immunisation Advisory Committee (2008) Immunisation Guidelines for Ireland 2008 edition. HSE National Immunisation Office Website. http://www.immunisation.ie/en/Downloads/NIACGuidelines/PDFFile_15486_en.pdf. Accessed 01 May 2012

  3. Jackson LA, Neuzil KM, Yu O et al (2003) Effectiveness of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med 348(18):1747–1755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nuorti JP, Whitney CG (2010) Updated recommendations for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease among adults using the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). MMWR 59(34):1102–1106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Central Statistics Office (2009) Report on Vital Statistics 2006. http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/vitalstats/2006/annualreport%202006.pdf. Accessed 01 May 2012

  6. Mereckiene J, O’Donnell J, Collins C et al (2007) Risk groups and uptake of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine in Ireland. Euro Surveill 10–12:350–353

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindley MC, Euler GL, Shimabukuro T (2006) Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage among persons aged >65 years, United States, 2004–2005. MMWR 55(39):1065–1068

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yancey AM, Jundt AB, Nelson KJ (2010) Pneumococcal vaccination process improvement in an acute care setting: Quality improvement report. Qual Saf Health Care. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.028746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Warner EA, Seleznick MJ (2004) Using medical record reminders to improve pneumococcal vaccination rates. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 30(6):331–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dexheimer JW, Talbot TR, Ye F et al (2011) A computerized pneumococcal vaccination reminder system in the adult emergency department. Vaccine 29(40):7035–7041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dexheimer JW, Jones I, Waitman R et al (2006) Prospective evaluation of a closed-loop, computerized reminder system for pneumococcal vaccination in the emergency department. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1839452/?tool=pubmed. Accessed 15 May 2012

  12. Coyle CM, Currie BP (2004) Improving the rates of inpatient pneumococcal vaccination: impact of standing orders versus computerized reminders to physicians. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15566021?dopt=Abstract. Accessed 01 May 2012

  13. Rhew DC, Glassman PA, Goetz MB et al (1999) Improving pneumococcal vaccine rates: nurse protocols versus clinical reminders. J Gen Intern Med 14(6):351–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sneller VP, Izurieta H, Bridges C et al Prevention and control of Vaccine-Preventable Disease in Long-Term Care Facilities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/downloads/bk_long-term-care.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2012

  15. Cadeddu C, De Waure C, Gualano MR, Di Nardo F, Ricciardi W (2012) 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPDs) in the elderly: is it really effective? J Prev Med Hyg 53(2):101–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Assaad U, El-Masri I, Porhomayon J, El-Solh AA (2012) Pneumonia immunization in older adults: review of vaccine effectiveness and strategies. Clin Interv Aging 7:453–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wagner C, Popp W, Posch M, Vlasich C, Rosenberger-Spitzy A (2003) Impact of pneumococcal vaccination on morbidity and mortality of geriatric patients: a case-controlled study. Gerontology 49(4):246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnstone J, Eurich DT, Minhas JK, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR (2010) Impact of the pneumococcal vaccine on long-term morbidity and mortality of adults at high risk for pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 51(1):15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    W. L. Macken, H. C. Macken & M. W. Butler

  2. Department of Clinical Audit, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    I. Callanan

  3. Education and Research Centre, UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland

    M. W. Butler

Authors
  1. W. L. Macken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. C. Macken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Callanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. W. Butler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. W. Butler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macken, W.L., Macken, H.C., Callanan, I. et al. Not written, not done: are we identifying elderly at-risk patients for pneumococcal vaccination?. Ir J Med Sci 182, 523–527 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0919-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0919-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation