Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Late presentation of HIV despite earlier opportunities for detection, experience from an Irish Tertiary Referral Institution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 31 January 2013

Abstract

Objectives

Late presentation of HIV continues to undermine advances in the management of HIV. Opportunities to detect HIV at an earlier stage are often missed. Current estimates suggest that undiagnosed individuals comprise approximately one quarter of all people in the western world living with HIV. ‘Testing-and-treating’ this group has been proposed as a means to curb the HIV epidemic. In this study we assessed the characteristics of individuals newly diagnosed with HIV, and their utilisation of healthcare services in Ireland prior to their diagnosis.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients newly diagnosed with HIV over a 27-month period. Patient demographics were recorded, as were details of healthcare contacts in the year preceding diagnosis. Individuals detected via screening of recent immigrants/asylum seekers were excluded.

Results

In the period studied 114 patients received a new diagnosis of HIV, 59 met inclusion criteria. The majority (54 %) fulfilled the European consensus definition for late presenters (CD4 < 350 cells/µl). ‘Late presenters’ were significantly more likely to be symptomatic at diagnosis (OR = 4.62; 95 % CI 1.45–14.67; p = 0.015), diagnosed by acute tertiary hospital services (p = 0.015), and 56 % reported heterosexual mode of acquisition (OR = 2.12; 95 % CI 0.73–6.16; p = 0.19). Patients detected via screening had significantly higher CD4 counts at diagnosis compared with those diagnosed due to symptoms (Median CD4 422 cells/µl; IQR 285–594 vs. 142 cells/µl; IQR 62–333; p = 0.0007). ‘Symptomatic’ patients were significantly more likely to report prior healthcare contacts (OR 4.71; 95 % CI 1.32–16.79; p = 0.013).

Conclusion

Current screening activities are inadequate. Unfortunately newly diagnosed HIV patients continue to be symptomatic, at advanced stages of disease, to acute hospital services. Heterosexual groups in particular are at risk for late detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Granich R, Crowley S, Vitoria M et al (2010) Highly active antiretroviral treatment as prevention of HIV transmission: review of scientific evidence and update. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 5(4):298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Granich RM, Gilks CF, Dye C, De Kock KM, Williams BG (2009) Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: a mathematical model. Lancet 373(9657):48–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cambiano V, Rodger AJ, Phillips AN (2011) ‘Test-and-treat’: the end of the HIV epidemic? Curr Opin Infect Dis 24(1):19–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Montaner JS, Lima VD, Barrios R et al (2010) Association of highly active antiretroviral therapy coverage, population viral load, and yearly new HIV diagnoses in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. Lancet 376(9740):532–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Glynn MK, Rhodes P. What is really happening with HIV trends in the United States? Modeling the national epidemic. Presented at: National HIV Prevention Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 12–15 June 2005 [Abstract T1-B11-13]

  6. CDC (2008) HIV Prevalence estimates: United States, 2006. MMWR 57(39):1073–1076

    Google Scholar 

  7. Health Protection Agency (2008) HIV in the United Kingdom: 2008 Report. Published Nov 2008

  8. CDC (2009) HIV/AIDS surveillance report 2007, vol 19. US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marks G, Crepaz N, Jannssen RS (2006) Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the USA. AIDS 20(10):1447–1450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Antinori A, Coenen T, Costagiola D, European Late Presenter Consensus Working Group et al (2011) Late presentation of HIV infection: a consensus definition. HIV Med 2(1):61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson M, Sabin C, Girardi E (2010) Definition and epidemiology of late presentation in Europe. Antivir Ther 15(1):3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan AK, Curtis H, Sabin CA, Johnson MA (2005) Newly diagnosed HIV infections: review in UK and Ireland. BMJ 330(7503):1301–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Battegay M, Fluckiger U, Hirschel B, Furrer H (2007) Late presentation of HIV-infected individuals. Antivir Ther 12(6):841–851

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nidaye B, Salleron J, Vincent A et al (2011) Factors associated with presentation to care with advanced HIV disease in Brussels and Northern France: 1997–2007. BMC Infect Dis 11:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolbers M, Bucher H, Furrer H et al (2008) Delayed diagnosis of HIV infection and late initiation of antiretroviral therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. HIV Med 9:397–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zoufaly A, an der Heiden M, Marius U et al (2012) Late presentation for HIV diagnosis and care in Germany. HIV Med 13(3):172–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. d’Arminio Monforte A, Cozzi-Lepri A, Girardi E et al (2011) Late presenters in new HIV diagnoses from an Italian Cohort of HIV-infected patients: prevalence and clinical outcome. Antivir Ther 16(7):1103–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burns FM, Johnson AM, Nazroo J et al (2008) Missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis within primary and secondary healthcare settings in the UK. AIDS 22(1):115–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liddicoat RV, Horton NJ, Urban R, Maier E, Christiansen D, Samet JH (2004) Assessing missed opportunities for HIV testing in medical settings. J Gen Intern Med 19(4):349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McDonald EA, Currie MJ, Bowden FJ (2006) Delayed diagnosis of HIV: missed opportunities and triggers for testing in the Australian capital territory. Sex Health 3(4):291–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Health protection surveillance centre. HIV and AIDS in Ireland 2011. http://www.hpsc.ie/hpsc/A-Z/HIVSTIs/HIVandAIDS/SurveillanceReports/File,13068,en.pdf. May 2012. Last accessed July 2012

  22. Philips A, Pezzotti P (2004) CASCADE Collaboration. Short-term risk of AIDS according to current CD4 cell count and viral load in antiretroviral drug-naïve individuals and those treated in the monotherapy era. AIDS 18:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Egger M, May M, Chene G et al (2002) Prognosis of HIV-1 infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Lancet 360(9327):119–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabin CA, Smith CJ, Gumley H et al (2004) Late presenters in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: uptake of and responses to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 18(16):2145–2151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR, Galletly CL (2008) Infections prevented by increasing HIV serostatus awareness in the United States 2001–2004. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 47(3):354–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanders GD, Bayoumi AM, Sundarum V et al (2005) Cost effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 352(6):570–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Paltiel AD, Walensky RP, Schackerman BR et al (2005) Expanded screening for HIV in the United States—an analysis of cost-effectiveness. N Eng J Med 352(6):S86–S95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. CDC (2006) Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR 55(RR-14):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paltiel AD (2006) Expanded HIV screening in the United States: effect on clinical outcomes, HIV transmission and costs. Ann Intern Med 145(11):797–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jenkins TC, Gardner EM, Thrun MW, Cohn DL, Burman WJ (2006) Risk based human immunodeficiency virus testing fails to detect majority of HIV-infected individuals in medical care settings. Sex Transm Dis 33(5):329–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the participating patients, and the staff of the department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine in Beaumont hospital, Dublin.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O’Shea. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D, O., Ebrahim, M., Egli, A. et al. Late presentation of HIV despite earlier opportunities for detection, experience from an Irish Tertiary Referral Institution. Ir J Med Sci 182, 389–394 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-012-0898-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-012-0898-2

Keywords

Navigation