Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Audit of a ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia service in Ireland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control was introduced at our institution in 2006. We audited the efficacy and safety of ward-based PCEA from January 2006 to December 2008.

Method

Data were collected from 928 patients who received PCEA in general surgical wards for postoperative analgesia using bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL.

Results

On the first postoperative day, the median visual analogue pain score was 2 at rest and 4 on activity. Hypotension occurred in 21 (2.2%) patients, excessive motor blockade in 16 (1.7%), high block in 5 (0.5%), nausea in 5 (0.5%) and pruritus in only 1 patient. Excessive sedation occurred in two (0.2%) patients but no intervention was required. There were no serious complications such as epidural abscess, infection or haematoma.

Conclusion

Effective and safe postoperative analgesia can be provided with PCEA in a general surgical ward without recourse to high-dependency supervision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Werawatganon T, Charuluxanun S (2005) Patient-controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004088

  2. Wu CL, Cohen SR, Richman JM et al (2005) Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 103:1079–1088 quiz 109-10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, DeFerranti S et al (1998) The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 86:598–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Modig J (1989) Influence of regional anesthesia, local anesthetics, and sympathicomimetics on the pathophysiology of deep vein thrombosis. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 550:119–124 discussion 24-7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S, Dahl JB (2000) Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001893

  6. Barratt SM, Smith RC, Kee AJ, Mather LE, Cousins MJ (2002) Multimodal analgesia and intravenous nutrition preserves total body protein following major upper gastrointestinal surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:15–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi P (2001) Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 93:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Vyver M, Halpern S, Joseph G (2002) Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 89:459–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu SS, Allen HW, Olsson GL (1998) Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl on hospital wards: prospective experience with 1,030 surgical patients. Anesthesiology 88:688–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott DA, Beilby DS, McClymont C (1995) Postoperative analgesia using epidural infusions of fentanyl with bupivacaine. A prospective analysis of 1,014 patients. Anesthesiology 83:727–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Broekema AA, Gielen MJ, Hennis PJ (1996) Postoperative analgesia with continuous epidural sufentanil and bupivacaine: a prospective study in 614 patients. Anesth Analg 82:754–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wigfull J, Welchew E (2001) Survey of 1,057 patients receiving postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Anaesthesia 56:70–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Motamed C, Farhat F, Remerand F et al (2006) An analysis of postoperative epidural analgesia failure by computed tomography epidurography. Anesth Analg 103:1026–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor Harald Breivik for his expert advice on the project. There was no grant or funding provided for this project.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest for all of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Tan.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Preset infusion protocols in the PCEA pumps

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, T., Wilson, D., Walsh, A. et al. Audit of a ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia service in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 180, 417–421 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0645-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0645-5

Keywords

Navigation