Skip to main content
Log in

Improving venous thromboembolic disease prophylaxis in medical inpatients: a role for education and audit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) prophylaxis is a key strategy in reducing preventable deaths in medical inpatients. We assessed compliance with internationally published guidelines for VTED prophylaxis in at-risk medical patients before and 1 month after an educational intervention to enhance compliance with such guidelines.

Results

One hundred and fifty patients were assessed on each occasion. Pre-intervention, VTED prophylaxis was prescribed in only 48% of at-risk cases. Compliance was best among patients under stroke services and worst for those under acute medical teams. Patients within specialist units were more likely to be prescribed prophylaxis than those in general wards (75 vs. 53%; p = 0.0019). Post-intervention, overall compliance improved to 63% (p = 0.041 for comparison). There was a significant improvement among general medical teams (48 vs. 75%; p = 0.001), and in general wards (52 vs. 74%; p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Thromboprophylaxis is under-prescribed in medical inpatients, but compliance with international guidelines can be significantly enhanced with targeted educational intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Francis CW (2007) Clinical practice. Prophylaxis for thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. N Engl J Med 356(14):1438–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY et al (1999) A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med 341(11):793–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther MA (2007) Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 146(4):278–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Avorn J, Winkelmayer WC (2004) Comparing the costs, risks, and benefits of competing strategies for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 110(24 Suppl 1):IV25–IV32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133(6 Suppl):381S–453S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF et al (2008) Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 371(9610):387–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tooher R, Middleton P, Pham C et al (2005) A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals. Ann Surg 241(3):397–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly J, Rudd A, Lewis R, Hunt BJ (2001) Venous thromboembolism after acute stroke. Stroke 32(1):262–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sherman DG, Albers GW, Bladin C et al (2007) The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after acute ischaemic stroke (PREVAIL Study): an open-label randomised comparison. Lancet 369(9570):1347–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis M, Sandercock PA, Reid J et al (2009) Effectiveness of thigh-length graduated compression stockings to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis after stroke (CLOTS trial 1): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373(9679):1958–1965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen AT, Alikhan R, Arcelus JI et al (2005) Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk and the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. Thromb Haemost 94(4):750–759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahn SR, Panju A, Geerts W et al (2007) Multicenter evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients in Canada. Thromb Res 119(2):145–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rashid ST, Thursz MR, Razvi NA et al (2005) Venous thromboprophylaxis in UK medical inpatients. J R Soc Med 98(11):507–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R et al (2005) Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 352(10):969–977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Timmons S, O’Callaghan C, O’Connor M, O’Mahony D, Twomey C (2005) Audit-guided action can improve the compliance with thromboembolic prophylaxis prescribing to hospitalized, acutely ill older adults. J Thromb Haemost 3(9):2112–2113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. D. Kent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kent, B.D., Nadarajan, P., Akasheh, N.B. et al. Improving venous thromboembolic disease prophylaxis in medical inpatients: a role for education and audit. Ir J Med Sci 180, 163–166 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0619-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0619-7

Keywords

Navigation